Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/055,568

PRE-CONSOLIDATED FINES LAYER FOR IMPROVED ENGINEERED WOOD PRODUCTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 18, 2025
Priority
Jun 24, 2021 — provisional 63/214,299 +1 more
Examiner
GROSS, CARSON
Art Unit
1746
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
550 granted / 754 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
781
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
72.1%
+32.1% vs TC avg
§102
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 754 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 15-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 05/03/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 14 recites the limitation “wherein the preconsolidated fines layer is extruded onto the top surface of the strand matrix.” This step is mutually exclusive with the method of claim 1 because claim 1 requires that the preconsolidated fines layer comprises a plurality of fines which are consolidated on a medium prior to application to the strand matrix. If the preconsolidated layer is formed and consolidated on a medium before application to the strand matrix, then the same layer cannot be extruded directly onto the strand matrix, as this direct extrusion would mean that the fines layer is not preconsolidated on a medium as required in claim 1, instead being applied directly to the strand matrix. Since the limitations of claim 14 are distinct and mutually exclusive with those recited in claim 1, one of ordinary skill in the art cannot be reasonably apprised of the metes and bounds of the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-13 are allowed. The closest prior art references are Calve (US 5,951,795) and Dubelsten (US 6,821,614). Calvé teaches a method of manufacturing surfaced panels, the method comprising: forming an oriented strandboard (OSB) mat (13), compressing a fines mat (10) between two rollers (11a,11b), applying the compressed fines mat to a top surface of the OSB mat, and laminating the OSB mat and the compressed fines mat together under heat and pressure (See Figures; col. 2, lines 24-59; col. 5, lines 40-63). In the method of Calve, a surface of the compressed fines mat which contacts the OSB mat is left uncured such that it may bond to the OSB mat during consolidation. Therefore one of ordinary skill would not form the fines mat of Calve on a medium (i.e. backer) in the manner claimed because to do so would prevent the uncured portion of the fines mat from interacting with the OSB mat. Dubelsten teaches a method of making a multi-layer cellulosic product, the method comprising pre-forming face layers which include wood fines and thermoplastic polymeric materials (See col. 17, line 49 to col. 18, line 55). The method of Dubelsten utilizes only thermoplastic and wood fines only in forming the face layers, and there is no motivation or teaching in the prior art which would have led one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the method of Dubelsten to form the face layers on an additional medium (i.e. backer) in the manner claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARSON GROSS whose telephone number is (571)270-7657. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm Eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Orlando can be reached at (571)270-5038. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARSON GROSS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 18, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683470
Method to Improve Adhesion of Rotor Magnets Being Embedded in an Interior Permanent Magnet Motor
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676252
TAPING HEAD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673797
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING A LABEL FOR THE AUTOMATED PRODUCTION OF E-VAPOR DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668049
METHODS AND FORMULATIONS FOR BONDING DISSIMILAR MATERIALS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654417
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING OF MULTILAYERED STRUCTURES
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+21.4%)
2y 5m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 754 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month