Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/055,648

INTEGRATED CONTROLLER FOR COOLING MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 18, 2025
Priority
Feb 19, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0023475
Examiner
BUKOWSKI, KENNETH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Coavis
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
549 granted / 809 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
832
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
78.3%
+38.3% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 809 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Min (US 2013.0058059) in view of Park (US 2023.0299514). Regarding claim 1, Min disclose: a case having a connector; a control board accommodated in the case coupled and electrically connected to electronic connections (see Fig. 1; case 20, connector 47, control board 40 within case; [0032] connector to connect circuit board to electronics or power source (e.g., see Park’s terminals)). While Min discloses shielding plate 10, it is not explicit as to, but Park disclose: a plurality of terminals coupled to the case and having one end protruding into the case and the other end protruding into the connector; plurality of terminals for electrical connection; a shielding plate shielding electromagnetic waves by surrounding the plurality of terminals and coupled to the case (see Fig. 1, 2; [0003]; plurality of terminals 15 coupled to case 11 having one end protruding in 11 and the other end protruding out of connector (open end); electromagnetic shield 12 surrounding plurality of electrical connection terminals). Therefore, it would have been obvious on one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of applicant’s invention, to combine the known techniques of Park to that of Kim to predictably provide terminals to electrically connect to the control board of Min, while also providing electromagnetic shielding of said terminals. Regarding claim 2, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Park further disclose: the plurality of terminals includes a motor output unit terminal (while Park discloses at [0003] the connector terminals can enable electrical/physical connection between electrical components, the specific “a motor output unit terminal” amounts to intended use of the connector and does not further limit the structure of the claimed apparatus. As such, Min as modified by Park readily provides the plurality of terminals for electrical connections). Regarding claim 3, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Park further disclose: an end of the shielding plate protrudes into the case (see Fig. 2) Regarding claim 4, the rejection of claim 3 is incorporated herein. Park further disclose: a connection tab extending upward is formed on a side of the shielding plate and protrudes into the case, and the connection tab is coupled and electrically connected to the control board (see Fig. 2; connection tab at 121, where it would have been obvious to try by one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s filing, since there are a finite number of identified, predictable potential solutions (e.g., placement of connection tabs to securely connect two parts) to be pursued by one of ordinary skill in the art with a reasonable expectation of success). Regarding claim 5, the rejection of claim 4 is incorporated herein. Park further disclose: a ground layer is formed on the control board and the connection tab is electrically connected with the ground layer (see [0041]; ground layer 12) Regarding claim 6, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Park further disclose: another end of the shielding plate protrudes into the connector (see Fig. 2, 4, 5; 121 protrudes into connector) Regarding claim 7, the rejection of claim 6 is incorporated herein. Park further disclose: fixing tabs extending toward an open side of the connector are formed on another side of the shielding plate and protrude into the connector (see Fig. 2, 4, 5; fixing tabs 1211/1222) Regarding claim 8, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Park further disclose: the shielding plate includes: a bottom plate covering the lower side of the plurality of terminals; and a pair of first side plates covering both width-directional sides of the plurality of terminals and extending upward from the bottom plate (see Fig. 2; 12 has sides protruding and covering terminals 15 from bottom plate) Regarding claim 9, the rejection of claim 8 is incorporated herein. Park further disclose: the shielding plate further includes a second side plate covering a longitudinal-side of the plurality of terminals and extending upward from the bottom plate (see Fig. 2; 12 has sides protruding and covering terminals 15 from bottom plate) Regarding claim 10, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. Min further disclose: the plurality of terminals and the shielding plate are integrally formed with the case by insert injection molding (see [0041]; injection molding of shield plate 10) Regarding claim 11, the rejection of claim 10 is incorporated herein. Min further disclose: the plurality of terminals and the shielding plate are integrally formed with fixing portions by insert injection molding, thereby forming a terminal-shielding plate assembly; and the terminal-shielding plate assembly is integrally formed with the case by over molding (in light of [0041]; it would have been obvious to try by one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s filing, since there are a finite number of identified, predictable potential solutions (e.g., injection molding to integrally form and fix components of the device) to be pursued by one of ordinary skill in the art with a reasonable expectation of success. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KENNETH BUKOWSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-7913. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday // 0730-1530. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amr Awad can be reached at 571.272.7764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /kenneth bukowski/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 18, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676095
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROJECTING IMAGE AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12658125
CONTROL DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651549
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF DRIVING DISPLAY PANEL USING THE SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646450
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND DISPLAY DRIVING METHOD
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12638686
HARDWARE AND HOUSING SETUP FOR WEARABLE AUGMENTED REALITY APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 11m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 809 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month