Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/056,529

GATE DRIVING CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING THE SAME

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Feb 18, 2025
Priority
Feb 19, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0023186
Examiner
TZENG, FRED
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
673 granted / 776 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§102
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to the amendment filed on 04/23/2026. Claims 1-17 remain pending with claim 12 has been amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 12-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. RE claim 12, the limitation of that “a plurality of pixel units including a first pixel and a second pixel that emits a same color as the first pixel” in lines 2-3 is vague and rendering claim 12 indefinite. Are first pixel and second pixel among the plurality of pixel units? Or simply, is one pixel unit of the plurality of pixel units including first pixel and second pixel? Correction is required. Claims 13-17 are depending on claim 12 and therefore are rejected on the same basis as claim 12. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11 are allowable over the prior art of record because none of the prior art of record teaches or fairly suggests the limitation of that, an output unit configured to output a first scan signal and a second scan signal based on a first selection scan signal, a first clock signal, and a control signal, wherein the output unit includes: a second controller configured to control a voltage of the first output node and a voltage of the second output node, output the voltage of the first output node as the first scan signal, and output the voltage of the second output node as the second scan signal, based on the first clock signal, a first voltage, and a second voltage being lower than the first voltage, in the environment of claim 1. The closest prior art of record is Lee (US 2022/0366836). Lee (US 2022/0366836) teaches that a scan driver including a plurality of stages, wherein a n-th stage among the plurality of stages comprising a first input unit controlling a voltage of a first node in response to a previous carry signal, a scan output unit outputting a current scan signal corresponding to a scan clock signal in response to the voltage of the first node, a first switching unit controlling a voltage of a second node in response to the previous carry signal, a sensing output unit outputting a current sensing signal corresponding to a sensing clock signal in response to the voltage of the second node, a carry output unit outputting a current carry signal corresponding to a carry clock signal in response to the voltage of the second node, and a second switching unit controlling the voltage of the second node in response to the sensing clock signal or the carry clock signal. Claims 14-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 14-17 are allowable because none of the prior art of record teaches or fairly suggests the limitation of that, a second driving transistor connected between the first power line and a sixth node and configured to generate a second driving current flowing from the first power line to the second power line via the second light emitting diode, in the environment of claim 14. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection (112 rejection) presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication from the examiner should be directed to FRED TZENG whose telephone number is 571-272-7565. The examiner can normally be reached on weekdays from 2:0 pm to 10:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Boddie can be reached on 571-272-0666. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned are 571-273-8300 for regular communications and 571-273-7565 for After Final communications. Informal regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docs for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000 (IN USA). /FRED TZENG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2625 FFT June 26, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 18, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 23, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706035
ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY HAVING PHOTODIODES
1y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700356
SENSING TIME FOR IMAGE RETENTION COMPENSATION IN OLED DISPLAYS
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12688871
USE OF COMMON HEAD SLIDER FOR DIFFERENT RPM HARD DISK DRIVES
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12687747
DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12682861
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.9%)
2y 6m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month