Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 17, 2026
Application No. 19/056,557

PROCESSING APPARATUS, PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 18, 2025
Priority
Feb 22, 2024 — JP 2024-025192
Examiner
BAKER, CHARLOTTE M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
1018 granted / 1098 resolved
+32.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1116
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§103
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1098 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 3-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Naruse (JP-2018151595-A). Regarding claim 1: Naruse discloses at least one memory storing instructions (Each of the image forming unit 120 and the control unit 100 includes, as its main components, a CPU (Central Processing Unit) for executing a program in a predetermined order and a RAM (Random Access Memory) for providing a working area necessary for executing the program ), A ROM (Read Only Memory) that provides a program, and the like. Further, all or part of the image forming unit 120 and / or the control unit 100 may be mounted using a hard wired circuit such as an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) or FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array)., par. 43); and at least one processor that, upon execution of the stored instructions (control unit 100 includes a processor, par. 76), is configured to operate as: an identification unit (When the fed sheet S reaches the detection range of the sheet type detection sensor, the image forming apparatus 1 detects the sheet type of the fed sheet S based on the detection result from the sheet type detection sensor (step S 204) ., par. 132) configured to identify a characteristic of a sheet (In the present specification, characteristics (size, weight (grammage), paper thickness, presence or absence of surface processing, etc.) of the paper S to be actually processed are also referred to as "paper type". That is, "paper type" is a term encompassing the attribute value of the target paper S., par. 46), based on a result of detection performed by a detection unit (When the fed sheet S reaches the detection range of the sheet type detection sensor, the image forming apparatus 1 detects the sheet type of the fed sheet S based on the detection result from the sheet type detection sensor (step S 204) ., par. 132) configured to detect a physical quantity having a value (As a non-contact type sensor, for example, an optical sensor using a laser light source or the like can be used. More specifically, the laser beam is irradiated from the light projecting unit while being disposed on one side of the arriving sheet S, and the intensity of light detected by the light receiving unit disposed on the opposite side (translucency The amount of light or the light transmittance). Alternatively, distance sensors using laser light or the like are disposed on both sides of the paper S, and based on the difference between the sum of the distances measured by the respective distance sensors and the arrangement interval between the distance sensors, The thickness can be measured. As described above, it is possible to measure the sheet thickness of the sheet S in a non-contact manner by using a laser beam or the like., pars. 71-73) corresponding to the characteristic of the sheet while the sheet is being conveyed (When the automatic setting mode is selected, until the paper type of the first sheet S is detected, the conveyance speed with respect to the sheet S is the lowest among the conveyance speeds set as the selectable sheet types Value may be adopted. That is, when the automatic setting mode is selected, the conveying speed from the sheet holding unit 20 to the paper type detection sensor may be conveyed at the lowest conveyance speed set for each paper type. That is, the conveyance speed when conveying the paper S to the detection range of the paper type detection sensor may be switched to the lowest speed among the conveyance speeds set for each paper type., par. 125); and a creation unit configured to create sheet type information including information indicating the characteristic of the sheet (With reference to FIG. 9, it is assumed that after the automatic setting mode is selected, the paper type of the supplied paper S is detected, and the paper setting is updated according to the detected paper type. Subsequently inputted jobs are processed according to the updated paper setting. The updated paper setting may be continued until there is a possibility that the paper type of the supplied paper S is changed., par. 128), and a print adjustment parameter corresponding to the characteristic (The image forming apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment has the technical concept of the following aspects. According to the first aspect, in an image forming apparatus that makes image forming conditions such as process setting, conveying speed, fixing setting and the like different depending on the type of paper, the paper type detection sensor disposed on the downstream side of the paper feed roller detects the paper type If it is not an image forming condition different from the selected sheet type, the sheet is passed. If the sheet can not be guaranteed, the sheet is temporarily stopped, the sheet type is set again, and the image formation is performed again. The paper type is detected by the paper type detection sensor disposed on the downstream side of the paper feed roller, and if it is not the image forming condition different from the selected paper type, the paper is passed, and in the case of the paper incapable of image security, It is possible to prevent jamming, image defects, and fixing defects by temporarily stopping the sheet type, re-setting the sheet type and redoing the image formation again, thereby printing on an improperly set sheet. Since the reconfiguration is performed automatically, there is no inconvenience of redoing the image formation after viewing the printed paper by the user, and inconvenience of having the user reconfigure can be prevented., par. 144), wherein the creation unit creates new sheet type information, based on the characteristic of the sheet identified by the identification unit (With reference to FIG. 9, it is assumed that after the automatic setting mode is selected, the paper type of the supplied paper S is detected, and the paper setting is updated according to the detected paper type. Subsequently inputted jobs are processed according to the updated paper setting. The updated paper setting may be continued until there is a possibility that the paper type of the supplied paper S is changed. As an example of such possibility that the type of paper of the supplied paper S is changed, for example, detection of attachment / detachment of the paper feed cassette 22 may be considered. That is, when a new sheet S withdrawn from the sheet feed cassette 22 is replenished, a sheet S of a different sheet type from the sheet type of the sheet S supplied in the previous process is supplied Since there is a possibility, in such a case, the paper type may be newly detected after resetting the paper setting., par. 128), and the print adjustment parameter (The image forming apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment has the technical concept of the following aspects. According to the first aspect, in an image forming apparatus that makes image forming conditions such as process setting, conveying speed, fixing setting and the like different depending on the type of paper, the paper type detection sensor disposed on the downstream side of the paper feed roller detects the paper type If it is not an image forming condition different from the selected sheet type, the sheet is passed. If the sheet can not be guaranteed, the sheet is temporarily stopped, the sheet type is set again, and the image formation is performed again. The paper type is detected by the paper type detection sensor disposed on the downstream side of the paper feed roller, and if it is not the image forming condition different from the selected paper type, the paper is passed, and in the case of the paper incapable of image security, It is possible to prevent jamming, image defects, and fixing defects by temporarily stopping the sheet type, re-setting the sheet type and redoing the image formation again, thereby printing on an improperly set sheet. Since the reconfiguration is performed automatically, there is no inconvenience of redoing the image formation after viewing the printed paper by the user, and inconvenience of having the user reconfigure can be prevented., par. 144) included in sheet type information including a characteristic similar to the characteristic identified by the identification unit, from already-existing sheet type information (In this manner, in the state in which the automatic setting mode is selected, the paper setting according to the detected paper type is maintained from the time when the paper type is detected until the paper feeding cassette is detached. That is, when the automatic setting mode is selected, the control unit 100 of the image forming apparatus 1 maintains the image forming conditions according to the detected paper type until the attachment and detachment of the paper feed cassette is performed , The subsequent job may be processed. While maintaining the paper setting according to the detected paper type while assuming that the paper type has not been changed until the paper feeding cassette is detached from the paper that detected the paper type , It is possible to form an image in accordance with the previously determined paper setting, and the first copy time can be shortened., par. 129). Regarding claim 3: Naruse satisfies all the elements of claim 1. Naruse further discloses wherein the creation unit duplicates a value of the print adjustment parameter included in the sheet type information including the characteristic similar to the characteristic of the sheet identified by the identification unit as a value of a print adjustment parameter to be included in the new sheet type information (When the current paper setting and the detected paper type of the paper S do not coincide (NO in step S 108), the image forming apparatus 1 determines whether or not the paper type of the detected paper S Whether or not printing is possible under the image forming conditions corresponding to the paper setting of step S110. If printing is possible under the image forming conditions corresponding to the current paper setting (YES in step S110), the processing in step S112 and the following steps are executed. In steps S108 and S110, the current paper setting is compared with the detected paper type, and if it is not wrong, the image forming processing is continued as it is, and even if the image forming condition is incorrect, if the image forming condition is If there is no problem even if the image forming process is continued as it is, the image forming process is continued. That is, even in the case where the paper type of the supplied paper S does not coincide with the paper type included in the current paper setting, when it is possible to form an image in accordance with the image forming condition according to the current paper setting, the toner The transfer of the toner image is continued without re-forming the image., pars. 110-111). Regarding claim 4: Naruse satisfies all the elements of claim 1. Naruse further discloses wherein the creation unit includes the characteristic of the sheet identified by the identification unit in the new sheet type information (FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining a state of paper setting in the automatic setting mode of the image forming apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment. With reference to FIG. 9, it is assumed that after the automatic setting mode is selected, the paper type of the supplied paper S is detected, and the paper setting is updated according to the detected paper type. Subsequently inputted jobs are processed according to the updated paper setting. The updated paper setting may be continued until there is a possibility that the paper type of the supplied paper S is changed. , par. 128). Regarding claim 5: Naruse satisfies all the elements of claim 1. Naruse further discloses wherein the creation unit selects, from the already-existing sheet type information, a piece of the sheet type information including the characteristic similar to the characteristic of the sheet identified by the identification unit, and automatically creates the new sheet type information (By adopting such an automatic setting mode, it is possible to start image formation after performing paper setting according to the paper type of paper S actually supplied. That is, when the automatic setting mode for determining the image forming condition is selected according to the detection result of the supplied paper type of the paper S, the control unit 100 of the image forming apparatus 1 performs detection by the paper type detection sensor After the result is obtained, the formation of the toner image in the image processing section 2 is started. As described above, if it is found out that image formation is started in accordance with preset paper setting, that the paper type of paper S actually supplied is not compatible with the paper setting, the formed toner It is necessary to clean the image from the image carrier. However, in the automatic setting mode, such processing is unnecessary so that it is possible to start the image forming process according to the appropriate paper setting by detecting the paper kind at an early stage., par. 124), based on the characteristic of the sheet identified by the identification unit (With reference to FIG. 9, it is assumed that after the automatic setting mode is selected, the paper type of the supplied paper S is detected, and the paper setting is updated according to the detected paper type. Subsequently inputted jobs are processed according to the updated paper setting. The updated paper setting may be continued until there is a possibility that the paper type of the supplied paper S is changed. As an example of such possibility that the type of paper of the supplied paper S is changed, for example, detection of attachment / detachment of the paper feed cassette 22 may be considered. That is, when a new sheet S withdrawn from the sheet feed cassette 22 is replenished, a sheet S of a different sheet type from the sheet type of the sheet S supplied in the previous process is supplied Since there is a possibility, in such a case, the paper type may be newly detected after resetting the paper setting., par. 128) and the value of the print adjustment parameter included in the sheet type information (The image forming apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment has the technical concept of the following aspects. According to the first aspect, in an image forming apparatus that makes image forming conditions such as process setting, conveying speed, fixing setting and the like different depending on the type of paper, the paper type detection sensor disposed on the downstream side of the paper feed roller detects the paper type If it is not an image forming condition different from the selected sheet type, the sheet is passed. If the sheet can not be guaranteed, the sheet is temporarily stopped, the sheet type is set again, and the image formation is performed again. The paper type is detected by the paper type detection sensor disposed on the downstream side of the paper feed roller, and if it is not the image forming condition different from the selected paper type, the paper is passed, and in the case of the paper incapable of image security, It is possible to prevent jamming, image defects, and fixing defects by temporarily stopping the sheet type, re-setting the sheet type and redoing the image formation again, thereby printing on an improperly set sheet. Since the reconfiguration is performed automatically, there is no inconvenience of redoing the image formation after viewing the printed paper by the user, and inconvenience of having the user reconfigure can be prevented., par. 144). Regarding claim 6: Naruse satisfies all the elements of claim 5. Naruse further discloses wherein the at least one processor is, upon execution of the stored instructions (control unit 100 includes a processor, par. 76), further configured to operate as a display control unit configured to display, on a display device (The input unit 110 is realized as a user interface provided on the front side of the image forming apparatus 1 and typically includes an operation panel including a display, a touch panel, various input buttons, a display indicator, and the like. The user can also input settings related to the paper via the input unit 110., par. 41), information indicating the sheet type information including the characteristic similar to the characteristic of the sheet identified by the identification unit from the already-existing sheet type information, as information indicating a candidate for the sheet type information to be used for creating the new sheet type information (On the user interface screen 210 shown in FIG. 5 (B), in order to notify that the current paper setting and the paper type of the actually supplied paper S are not compatible and prompt the user to change the paper setting Message 212 is presented. Furthermore, on the user interface screen 210, in addition to the icon 214 indicating the current paper setting, an icon group 216 indicating each paper setting as a candidate after the change is displayed. In accordance with the detection result of the actually supplied paper S among the icons included in the icon group 216, the paper setting icon 218 which is preferably selected is presented in a different display manner. As different display modes, the coloring or the presence or absence of blinking may be different, or some additional message may be displayed., pars. 87-88), and wherein the creation unit creates the new sheet type information, based on the characteristic of the sheet identified by the identification unit, and the value of the print adjustment parameter included in the sheet type information selected from among a plurality of the candidates (As described above, in this embodiment, when the paper setting in advance and the paper type of the actually supplied paper S are different, when prompting the user to reset paper setting, detection of the paper S The paper setting corresponding to the type of paper to be made may be recommended to the user. That is, the control unit 100 of the image forming apparatus 1 recommends changing to the paper setting corresponding to the paper type of the supplied paper S. In this way, in the case where it is necessary to re-set the paper setting due to an incorrect paper setting in advance, by recommending the detected type of paper to the user, in the next paper setting or the like , It is possible to prevent the user from erroneously setting paper., par. 89). Regarding claim 7: Naruse satisfies all the elements of claim 6. Naruse further discloses wherein the at least one processor is, upon execution of the stored instructions (control unit 100 includes a processor, par. 76), further configured to operate as a selection unit configured to select sheet type information to serve as the candidate from among sheet type information in which the characteristic similar to the characteristic of the sheet identified by the identification unit is set, and wherein the display control unit displays on the display device the information indicating the candidate selected by the selection unit (On the user interface screen 210 shown in FIG. 5 (B), in order to notify that the current paper setting and the paper type of the actually supplied paper S are not compatible and prompt the user to change the paper setting Message 212 is presented. Furthermore, on the user interface screen 210, in addition to the icon 214 indicating the current paper setting, an icon group 216 indicating each paper setting as a candidate after the change is displayed., par. 87). Regarding claim 8: Naruse satisfies all the elements of claim 7. Naruse further discloses wherein a condition for the sheet type information (As described above, the control unit 100 of the image forming apparatus 1 causes the image processing unit 2 to form a toner image in accordance with the image forming condition according to the current sheet setting, and also controls the conveyance mechanism (a pair of sheet feed rollers 24 and a pair The timing roller 26 or the like) to start supplying the sheet S. The control unit 100 of the image forming apparatus 1 determines whether or not the paper type of the supplied paper S matches the current paper setting based on the detection result from the paper type detection sensor, If the paper type of the paper S matches the current paper setting, the transfer of the formed toner image to the supplied paper S is continued. On the other hand, when the paper type of the supplied paper S does not match the current paper setting, the control unit 100 of the image forming apparatus 1 performs image formation corresponding to the paper type of the paper S supplied to the image processing unit 2 Reforms the toner image according to the condition, and transfers the re-formed toner image to the supplied sheet S. , par. 61) to serve as the candidate includes a condition using the information stored in association with the sheet type information at least at one of a time when the sheet type information is created, and a time when the sheet type information is updated ( On the user interface screen 210 shown in FIG. 5 (B), in order to notify that the current paper setting and the paper type of the actually supplied paper S are not compatible and prompt the user to change the paper setting Message 212 is presented. Furthermore, on the user interface screen 210, in addition to the icon 214 indicating the current paper setting, an icon group 216 indicating each paper setting as a candidate after the change is displayed., par. 87). Regarding claim 9: The structural elements of apparatus claim 1 perform all of the steps of method claim 9. Thus, claim 9 is rejected for the same reasons discussed in the rejection of claim 1. Regarding claim 10: Arguments analogous to those stated in the rejection of claim 1 are applicable. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium is inherently taught as evidenced by control unit 100 and various memories stored therein. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLOTTE M BAKER whose telephone number is (571)272-7459. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JENNIFER MEHMOOD can be reached at (571)272-2976. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLOTTE M BAKER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2664 06 October 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 18, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764246
Selection System, Method, And Computer Program For Selecting Ink Amount Set
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761843
RELAY DEVICE HAVING PROXY SERVER FUNCTION, CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764239
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12744856
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738045
USE OF A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TO UPDATE ANOTHER MACHINE LEARNING MODEL
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+0.3%)
2y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1098 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month