Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/056,713

CONTAINMENT UNIT, CONTAINMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTAINING FLUID LEAKS

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Feb 18, 2025
Priority
Jul 21, 2020 — provisional 63/054,645 +3 more
Examiner
OQUENDO, CARIB A
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Marquix Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
665 granted / 854 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
870
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
47.4%
+7.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 854 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-19 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,228,017. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art does not teach nor fairly suggest the curtain unit comprising a helical spring, and an upper thrust roller bearing mounted on the flotation unit and a lower thrust roller bearing mounted on the weighted base, wherein the upper and lower thrust roller bearings facilitate rotation of the curtain unit with respect to the flotation unit and the weighted base. The invention provides a containment unit for containing and recovering leaks, quickly and efficiently. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARIB A OQUENDO whose telephone number is (571)270-7411. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Anderson can be reached at 571-270-5281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARIB A OQUENDO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3678
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 18, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746586
METHOD FOR IN-SITU REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL THROUGH MULTI-TECHNOLOGY COUPLING
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12728452
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMEDIATING SOIL
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729500
SPIDER-WEB INSPIRED GEOGRIDS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12709854
VESSEL AND A METHOD OF INSERTING A MONOPILE INTO A GUIDE
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12704045
CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION IN ENCAPSULATED SALT MINIBASINS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+12.4%)
1y 11m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 854 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month