Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/057,045

MACULAR HOLE MEASUREMENT FOR HANDHELD INSTRUMENTS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 19, 2025
Priority
Mar 20, 2024 — provisional 63/567,656
Examiner
ADAM, MOHAMMED SOHAIL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Alcon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
139 granted / 210 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +59% interview lift
Without
With
+58.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
253
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 210 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I (Figures 1-2, claims 1-4 and 11-12) in the reply filed on 09/03/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 5-10 and 13-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 09/03/2026. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 11 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 line 8 “or end effector” is suggested to read “or the end effector” for better antecedent basis. Claim 11 line 1 “An surgical instrument” is suggested to read “A surgical instrument” for better grammar. Claim 11 line 7 “or handle” is suggested to read “or the handle” for better antecedent basis. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 11-12, and 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mustafa et al. (US PGPub 2023/0346402), hereinafter known as “Mustafa.” With regards to claim 1, Mustafa discloses (Figures 1A-2E and 6A-6B) a surgical instrument 10, comprising: a handle 23, comprising a distal end and a proximal end (paragraph 87; figure 1B); an instrument portion 16 extending from the distal end of the handle 23, the instrument portion 16 comprising a distal end 31 (figures 1A-1C); and an outer tube 12 located around the instrument portion 16 (paragraphs 74 and 76; figures 2A-2C), wherein: the distal end 31 of the instrument portion 16 comprises an end effector 16, a degree of movement of the outer tube 12 or end effector 16 of the surgical instrument 10 corresponds to a scale (paragraph 87 – indent or marking) on the handle 23 of the surgical instrument 10 that facilitates measurement of a tissue during ophthalmic procedures (paragraph 87 – functional limitation - “trigger 26 can be a slider that is movable to an indent or marking... Trigger 26 is a slider button that can be moved proximally-distally along housing 27. Such movement pulls outer tube 12 proximally to partially and then fully uncover and deploy funnel-like sleeve 16. Indents in housing 27 stop the slider button at preset positions corresponding to a first partial deployment (cone-like shape), second and optionally third partial deployments and full deployment” – therefore the measurement of the tissue during ophthalmic procedures is capable with the slider 26 controlling the deployment stages of the sleeve 16), and movement of the outer tube 12 or the end effector 16 facilitates measurement of the tissue (paragraphs 82 and 87 – functional limitation - “trigger 26 can be a slider that is movable to an indent or marking... Trigger 26 is a slider button that can be moved proximally-distally along housing 27. Such movement pulls outer tube 12 proximally to partially and then fully uncover and deploy funnel-like sleeve 16. Indents in housing 27 stop the slider button at preset positions corresponding to a first partial deployment (cone-like shape), second and optionally third partial deployments and full deployment” – therefore the measurement of the tissue is capable with the slider 26 controlling the deployment stages of the sleeve 16). With regards to claim 2, Mustafa discloses wherein the outer tube 12 is configured to translate toward the distal end of the instrument portion 16 upon translation of a slider 26 (paragraph 87 – functional limitation – “Trigger 26 is a slider button that can be moved proximally-distally along housing 27. Such movement pulls outer tube 12 proximally to partially and then fully uncover and deploy funnel-like sleeve 16” – therefore the trigger 26 is also capable of sliding distally towards the distal end 31 of the instrument portion 16). With regards to claim 3, Mustafa discloses wherein the end effector 16 of the instrument portion 16 is a loop 16 (paragraph 92 – entirety of the funnel-sleeve 16 is interpreted as a plurality of loops) coupled to a slider 26 on the handle 23 (paragraphs 74, 76, 82 and 87 - inner tube 14 is attached to the end effector 16, inner tube 14 may be controlled by the slider 26 to deploy the end effector 16). With regards to claim 4, Mustafa discloses wherein the slider 26 moves relative to markings on the surgical instrument 10 corresponding to a diameter of the loop 16 at the distal end 31 of the instrument portion 16 extended from the outer tube 12 (paragraph 87 – “trigger 26 can be a slider that is movable to an indent or marking... Trigger 26 is a slider button that can be moved proximally-distally along housing 27. Such movement pulls outer tube 12 proximally to partially and then fully uncover and deploy funnel-like sleeve 16. Indents in housing 27 stop the slider button at preset positions corresponding to a first partial deployment (cone-like shape), second and optionally third partial deployments and full deployment” – the diameter of the loop 16 is controlled by the relative deployment stages marked by the indents in the housing in which the slider 26 slides to). With regards to claim 11, Mustafa discloses an surgical instrument 10, comprising: a handle 23, comprising a distal end and a proximal end (figure 1B; paragraph 87); and an instrument portion 16 extending from the distal end of the handle 23, the instrument portion 16 comprising a distal end 31 (figures 1A-1C), wherein: the distal end 31 of the instrument portion 16 comprises an end effector 16, and the end effector 16 or handle 23 has a measurement scale (paragraph 87 – indent or marking) thereon corresponding to a sizing scale for facilitating measurement of a tissue by the end effector 16 during ophthalmic procedures (paragraph 87 – functional limitation - “trigger 26 can be a slider that is movable to an indent or marking... Trigger 26 is a slider button that can be moved proximally-distally along housing 27. Such movement pulls outer tube 12 proximally to partially and then fully uncover and deploy funnel-like sleeve 16. Indents in housing 27 stop the slider button at preset positions corresponding to a first partial deployment (cone-like shape), second and optionally third partial deployments and full deployment” – therefore the measurement of the tissue during ophthalmic procedures is capable with the slider 26 controlling the deployment stages of the sleeve 16). With regards to claim 12, Mustafa discloses wherein the surgical instrument 10 further comprises an outer tube 12 located around the instrument portion 16, wherein movement of the outer tube 12 activates the end effector 16 (paragraphs 74, 76 and 87; figures 2A-2C). With regards to claim 16, Mustafa discloses wherein the loop 16 is configured to peel an internal limiting membrane (ILM) (functional limitation – paragraph 2 – “The present invention relates to a system for retrieving material or objects from a biological vessel” – therefore is capable of peeling/retrieving an ILM). With regards to claim 17, Mustafa discloses wherein the loop 16 is configured to expand as the loop 16 is pushed out of the outer tube 12 and configured to elastically deform to fit within the outer tube 12 as the loop 16 is retracted into the outer tube 12 (figures 2A-2C; functional limitation – paragraph 63 – “the funnel-like sleeve can be fabricated from metallic (e.g. stainless steel or NITINOL)” – Nitinol has elastic properties that can deform to fit within the outer tube 12). With regards to claim 18, Mustafa discloses wherein the end effector 16 of the instrument portion 16 is a loop 16 (paragraph 92 – entirety of the funnel-sleeve 16 is interpreted as a plurality of loops) coupled to a slider 26 on the handle 23 (paragraphs 74, 76, 82 and 87 - inner tube 14 is attached to the end effector 16, inner tube 14 may be controlled by the slider 26 to deploy the end effector 16). With regards to claim 19, Mustafa discloses wherein the loop 16 is configured to peel an internal limiting membrane (ILM) (functional limitation – paragraph 2 – “The present invention relates to a system for retrieving material or objects from a biological vessel” – therefore is capable of peeling/retrieving an ILM). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMED S ADAM whose telephone number is (571)272-8981. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jackie Ho can be reached at 571-272-4696. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMED S ADAM/Examiner, Art Unit 3771 09/16/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746006
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device and Method
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746026
Apparatus and Method of Connection of Attachments to a Holder
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12690960
HYBRID PROSTHESIS AND DELIVERY SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12672926
DRILL GUIDE FIXTURES, CRANIAL INSERTION FIXTURES, AND RELATED METHODS AND ROBOTIC SYSTEMS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12636099
Multi-Port Surgical Robotic System Architecture
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+58.6%)
3y 0m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 210 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month