Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/057,272

ENFORCEMENT OF A MAXIMUM RESULT SET SIZE RULE FOR QUERIES REQUESTED FOR EXECUTION AGAINST A DATABASE SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 19, 2025
Examiner
BULLOCK, JOSHUA
Art Unit
2153
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Ocient Holdings LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
522 granted / 634 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
662
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§103
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§102
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 634 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-8, & 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable over Svoboda et al. (US Pub. No. 2015/0310067 A1). In respect to Claim 1, Svoboda teaches: a query processing system comprises: at least one processor, and at least one memory that stores operational instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the query processing system to: determine a set of query rules that includes a maximum result set size rule; (Svoboda teaches [0006] determination of query rules.) receive a query from a requesting entity; (Svoboda teaches [0054] reception of a query.) determine a size of a result set of the query; (Svoboda [0034, 0039]) generate compliance data based on determining whether the size of the result set complies with the maximum result set size rule; (Svoboda teaches [0057] generation of compliance data, wherein a request to determine whether a query complies is a component of the rules database.) when the compliance data indicates the size of the result set complies with the maximum result set size rule: generate a query result for the query based on the result set, wherein the result set is generated based on executing at least one query function indicated in the query against a database system; and transmit the query result to the requesting entity; (Svoboda teaches [0062] generation of results for a query.) and when the compliance data indicates the size of the result set does not comply with the maximum result set size rule: forego transmission of the query result to the requesting entity (Svoboda [0064]) As per Claim 3, Svoboda teaches: wherein the result set is generated prior to generating the compliance data, and wherein determining the size of the result set is based on generating the result set (Svoboda teaches [0057] generation of compliance data, wherein a request to determine whether a query complies is a component of the rules database.) As per Claim 4, Svoboda teaches: wherein the result set is generated after generating the compliance data, further comprising: generating estimated result set size data based on the query indicating an estimate for the size of the result set, wherein determining the size of the result set is based on applying the estimate for the size of the result set (Svoboda teaches [0062] generation of results for a query.) As per Claim 5, Svoboda teaches: wherein the set of query rules further includes at least one additional rule, wherein compliance data indicates the query complies with the set of query rules when the query being determined to further comply with the at least one additional rule, and wherein the query result is transmitted when the compliance data indicates the query complies with the set of query rules (Svoboda [0062]) As per Claim 6, Svoboda teaches: wherein the compliance data indicates the query does not comply with the set of query rules when the query is determined to not comply with the at least one additional rule, further comprising: foregoing transmission of the query result to the requesting entity when the compliance data indicates the size of the result set complies with the maximum result set size rule and when compliance data indicates the query does not comply with the at least one additional rule (Svoboda [0057]) As per Claim 7, Svoboda teaches: wherein generating the result set includes accessing a set of records included in a database table stored by the database system, and wherein the result set includes a subset of the set of records included in the database table based on identifying ones of the set of records comparing favorably to filtering parameters indicated in the query (Svoboda teaches [0062] generation of results for a query.) As per Claim 8, Svoboda teaches: wherein determining whether the size of the result set complies with the maximum result set size rule is based on: determining a number of records included in the result set; and comparing the number of records included in the result set to a threshold maximum number of records indicated by the maximum result set size rule (Svoboda teaches [0057] generation of compliance data, wherein a request to determine whether a query complies is a component of the rules database.) Claim 19 is the method claim corresponding to system claim 1, therefore is rejected for the same reasons noted previously. Claim 20 is the media claim corresponding to system claim 1, therefore is rejected for the same reasons noted previously. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 & 9-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA BULLOCK whose telephone number is (571)270-1395. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kavita Stanley can be reached at 571-272-8352. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA BULLOCK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2153 January 8, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602401
NON-DISRUPTIVE TRANSITION TO SYNCHRONOUS REPLICATION STATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585987
REMOTE STATISTICAL GENERATION OF GRAPHS FOR GRAPH MACHINE LEARNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12561289
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND USING SHARED NATURAL LANGUAGE LIBRARIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561294
SOFTWARE QUALITY TICKET ENRICHMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561291
METHOD OF CLOUD STORAGE FILE SYNCHRONIZATION PRIORITIZATION FOR SELECTED USERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.5%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 634 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month