Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/057,996

PACKAGED OBJECT AND PACKAGE MEMBER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 20, 2025
Examiner
ACKUN, JACOB K
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
58%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
717 granted / 1272 resolved
-13.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1308
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
70.0%
+30.0% vs TC avg
§102
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1272 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP 2014-048509 cited herein, hereinafter JP509. Regarding claim 1, JP509 discloses most of the features of the claims. See, for example, paragraphs [0018] and [0028]. What the reference may not expressly disclose are the claim limitations in the second paragraph of claim 1, that is C2 is aligned with C1 as disclosed, for example, in Fig 5. On the other hand, given the above noted reference disclosure, it would have been obvious to provide JP509 with the feature in question, for the purpose of adequately protecting the photosensitive member (photosensitive drum 1) without placing the protective sheet 2 too close to any one edge of the photosensitive member, so as to help in accurately positioning the ends of the drum as described in the reference. Regarding claim 3, it would have been obvious to space the edges of the protective sheet as claimed, for the purpose of adequately protecting the photosensitive surfaces of the drum whilst making it even easier to accurately position the ends of the drum as described in the reference. Regarding claim 4, see the materials described in [0017]. Claim(s) 5-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP509 in view of Light et al. (5,209,352). JP509 does not disclose that a plurality of the electrophotographic photosensitive members disclosed therein can be placed in an accommodation container that supports the ends of the members as required in claim 5. On the other hand, Light is applied to show that it is conventional in the packaging arts, to store a plurality of rolls, such as rolls of photosensitive material in an accommodation container (container 12 in Light) that supports the ends of the roll. Therefore, it would have been obvious to store a plurality of the JP509 members in an accommodation container as claimed, for the purpose of providing better protection to the members during storage or transportation, while also advantageously allowing for the members to be stored and/or transported more than one at a time. Light discloses the resins required in claim 6 in column 3 thereof. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB K ACKUN whose telephone number is (571)272-4418. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 11am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E. Aviles can be reached at (571) 270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JACOB K ACKUN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 20, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600521
RETAIL PACKAGING FOR ANGULAR BRUSH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600552
EXPANDABLE FOAM CORNER PROTECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582764
PEN NEEDLE MAGAZINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585472
CONFIGURATION OF UNPOWERED DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570873
GLASSINE PAPER MATERIAL FOR WRAPPING SELF-ADHESIVE NOTE PADS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
58%
With Interview (+2.0%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1272 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month