Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/058,071

SUPPORT STRUCTURE OF BATTERY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 20, 2025
Priority
Apr 30, 2024 — JP 2024-073927
Examiner
SHELTON, IAN BRYCE
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
ISUZU MOTORS Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
216 granted / 277 resolved
+26.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
314
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 277 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ragot (US 20250206122 A1). Regarding claim 1, Ragot discloses a battery support structure (frame supports 70) by which the battery (energy storage system 100) is supported on a vehicle (vehicle 10) in a state of the battery being drawn in one direction along a horizontal plane (y-axis 24, fig.2), the battery support structure comprising: a first elastic body (second portion 404 having first abutment surface 420, figs.4A-C) including a first elastic surface (first abutment surface 420, figs.4A-C) that is inclined (normal vector 440 shows incline of abutment surface 420, figs.4A-C) toward one side in a direction orthogonal to the one direction and along the horizontal plane (normal vector 440 of abutment surface 420 has X-component 442, Y-component 444, and Z-component 446, figs.4A-C), the first elastic surface, when the battery is drawn, being sandwiched between a side of the battery and a side of the vehicle and generating a restoring force against compression deformation of the first elastic surface (first abutment surface 420 is between the battery 100 and the frame 50 of vehicle 10, figs.2-4C); and a second elastic body (second portion 404 having second abutment surface 422, figs.4A-C) including a second elastic surface (second abutment surface 422, figs.4A-C) that is inclined (normal vector 450 shows incline of abutment surface 422, figs.4A-C) toward another side opposite to the one side (normal vector 450 of abutment surface 422 has X-component 450, Y-component 454, and Z-component 456, figs.4A-C), the second elastic surface, when the battery is drawn, being sandwiched between the side of the battery and the side of the vehicle and generating a restoring force against compression deformation of the second elastic surface (second abutment surface 422 is between the battery 100 and the frame 50 of vehicle 10, figs.2-4C). Regarding claim 2, Ragot discloses wherein the first elastic surface and the second elastic surface are disposed to be separated from each other in the direction orthogonal to the one direction and along the horizontal plane (first abutment surface 420 is separated from second abutment surface 422 along x-axis 22, figs.4A-C). Regarding claim 3, Ragot discloses wherein: the first elastic body includes a plate surface (first abutment surface 420, figs.4A-C) and is disposed on the side of the vehicle via a first bracket (second portion 404 has sides separated by recess portion 416 forming mounting brackets with first bracket being on the left in figures 4A-B supporting the abutment surface 420) so that the plate surface of the first elastic body constitutes the first elastic surface; and the second elastic body includes a plate surface (second abutment surface 422, figs.4A-C) and is disposed on the side of the vehicle via a second bracket (second portion 404 has sides separated by recess portion 416 forming mounting brackets with second bracket being on the right in figures 4A-B supporting the abutment surface 422) so that the plate surface of the second elastic body constitutes the second elastic surface. Regarding claim 4, Ragot discloses further comprising: a restraint member (support brackets 80 and bars 90, figs.2-3) that restrains the battery on the side of the vehicle, wherein the restraint member restrains the battery in a state where the battery is drawn toward the side of the vehicle so that (paragraphs [0042-0043]), when the battery is drawn with a predetermined force, the restraint member receives a reaction force against the predetermined force from the battery (figs.2-3, paragraphs [0042-0043]). Regarding claim 5, Ragot discloses wherein: the first elastic surface is inclined toward a front side in a vehicle front-rear direction (first abutment surface 420 is inclined toward a front side of vehicle 10 in positive x-axis 22, figs.1-4C); and the second elastic surface is inclined toward a rear side in the vehicle front-rear direction (second abutment surface 422 is inclined toward a rear side of vehicle 10 in negative x-axis 22, figs.1-4C) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art not relied upon but considered pertinent to the applicant’s disclosure is included in the 892 form. The art included has features related to claim limitations, the general structural of the invention, teachings, and other analogous art to the invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IAN BRYCE SHELTON whose telephone number is (571)272-6501. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Shriver can be reached at (303)-297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /IAN BRYCE SHELTON/Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 20, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767204
CHILD TRANSPORT DEVICE SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759639
ELECTRIC WORK VEHICLE
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752865
Multipurpose Vehicle
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746996
VEHICLE
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746811
AIR COOLING MEANS FOR COOLING MOTOR VEHICLE COMPONENTS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 277 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month