Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/058,977

INTELLIGENT FIREWALL POLICY PROCESSOR

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Feb 20, 2025
Priority
Nov 30, 2022 — IN 202241069004 +1 more
Examiner
ZONG, RUOLEI
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Juniper Networks Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
825 granted / 950 resolved
+26.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
958
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
77.2%
+37.2% vs TC avg
§102
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§112
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 950 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION The non-final office action is responsive to the filing of U.S. Patent Application 19/058,977 on 02/20/2025. Claims 1-20 are pending; claims 1-20 are rejected. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/27/2025, 06/27/2025, 10/01/2025, 01/08/2026, and 06/03/2026 were filed before the mailing date of the non-final office action. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,267,300 B2 (hereinafter P300). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Claim 1 of the Instant Application Claim 1 of P300 A network system comprising: A network system comprising: processing circuitry; processing circuitry; one or more memories coupled to the processing circuitry and configured to store instructions which, when executed by the processing circuitry, cause the network system to: one or more memories coupled to the processing circuitry and configured to store instructions which, when executed by the processing circuitry, cause the network system to: obtain telemetry data, the telemetry data being associated with a plurality of applications running on a plurality of hosts; obtain telemetry data, the telemetry data being associated with a plurality of applications running on a plurality of hosts; predict, based on the telemetry data, a subset of applications of the plurality of applications to run on a first host of the plurality of hosts; based on the telemetry data, determine which applications of the plurality of applications run on a first host of the plurality of hosts, the determined applications comprising a subset of applications of the plurality of applications; determine a subset of firewall policies of a plurality of firewall polices, each of the subset of firewall policies applying to at least one respective application of the subset of applications; determine which firewall policies of a plurality of firewall polices apply to the subset of applications, the determined firewall policies comprising a subset of firewall policies of the plurality of firewall policies, each of the subset of firewall policies applying to at least one respective application of the subset of applications; generate an indication of the subset of firewall policies; and generate an indication identifying the subset of firewall policies; and send the indication to a management plane of a distributed firewall. send the indication to a management plane of a distributed firewall. Claims 1 of the instant application is obviously disclosed by patent claim 1 in that claim 1 of the patent contains all the limitations of claim 1 of the instant application. Claim 1 of the instant application therefore is not patently distinct from the earlier patent claim and as such is unpatentable for obvious-type double patenting. As to claims 2-20, claims 1-20 of P300 obviously disclose all limitations of claims 2-20 of the instant application. Accordingly, claims 2-20 of the instant application are not patently distinct from the earlier patent claims and as such are unpatentable for obvious-type double patenting. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 allowable over prior art references on record. Note: the ODP rejection needs to be overcome in order to allow the case. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art references on record do not disclose “predict, based on the telemetry data, a subset of applications of the plurality of applications to run on a first host of the plurality of hosts; determine a subset of firewall policies of a plurality of firewall polices, each of the subset of firewall policies applying to at least one respective application of the subset of applications; generate an indication of the subset of firewall policies; and send the indication to a management plane of a distributed firewall.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RUOLEI ZONG whose telephone number is (571)270-7522. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-4:30PM IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wing F Chan can be reached at (571)272-7493. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RUOLEI ZONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2449 6/11/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 20, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676797
METHODS AND APPARATUS TO DYNAMICALLY MANAGE AUDIBLY PROXIMATE DEVICES DURING USER ACTIVITIES
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676825
RECOMMENDING CONTENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676830
CONCURRENT SUPPORT OF MULTIPLE DOWNSTREAM PHYSICAL TETHERING LINKS VIA A VIRTUAL TUNNEL LINK
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12659224
PARAMETER CONFIGURATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, CONTROLLER, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652254
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING NETWORK DEVICES
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 3m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 950 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month