Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/059,630

SYSTEMS AND METHODS HAVING A HEAT SINK FOR INDUCTION WELDING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 21, 2025
Priority
Jan 29, 2021 — provisional 63/143,218 +2 more
Examiner
MCNALLY, DANIEL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
The Boeing Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
699 granted / 1028 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1058
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1028 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Heller et al. [US3574031] in view of Van Ingen et al. [US2020/0276769]. Heller discloses a method comprising applying a magnetic flux to a weld interface between a first thermoplastic component and a second thermoplastic component (column 6, lines 16-53); heating the weld interface between the first thermoplastic component and the second thermoplastic component using the applied magnetic flux (induction heating; column 6, lines 16-53). Heller does not disclose drawing off, by a heatsink, heat off a contoured surface of the first thermoplastic component. Van Ingen discloses a method of comprising welding composite laminates together (paragraph 0006-8). Van Ingen discloses applying a heat sink next to the welded area to pull heat out of the laminate and helps to avoid delamination and void zones (paragraph 0010). Van Ingen discloses the heat sink is flexible and defects into a curve to follow the contour of a surface (paragraph 0020-21; Figure 9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to modify the method of Heller by including a heat sink conformed to a contoured surface as taught by Van Ingen in order to prevent delamination and voids in the weld area. With respect to claims 17-18, Van Ingen discloses the first and second thermoplastic components can be a skin and rib (paragraph 0135, 0138). With respect to claim 19, Heller discloses an induction heating coil and Van Ingen discloses the induction welding coil (15) can be located above a portion of the heat sink (5) (paragraph 0032). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 20 is allowed. Claims 2-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL MCNALLY whose telephone number is (571)272-2685. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Orlando can be reached at 571-270-5038. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL MCNALLY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1746 DPM September 3, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 17, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 17, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734075
Split Formation of Unitary Substrates
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738525
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721757
METHOD FOR PROCESSING NONWOVEN SHEETS BY COMBINED ACTIVATION AND BONDING
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722345
METHOD FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC WELDING OF MOLDED PARTS AND A HEAT SINK FOR USE IN SUCH METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12703809
METHOD FOR PRODUCING PRODUCT, ADHESIVE COMPOSITION AND FOAMING ADHESIVE SHEET
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+13.6%)
3y 0m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1028 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month