Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/059,668

INTERLOCK FASTENER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 21, 2025
Examiner
CHANG, OLIVIA C
Art Unit
3775
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Xander Medical
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
612 granted / 726 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 726 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on February 27, 2026 has been entered. As directed by the amendment, claims 1 has been amended and claims 16-20 have been cancelled. Claim 15 was previously withdrawn and claims 21-22 have been added. As such, claims 1-14 and 21-22 remain under consideration in the instant application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Abbasi et al. (US 2020/0375750), hereinafter “Abbasi”. Regarding claim 1, Abbasi discloses a fastener device (FIGS. 87-88), comprising: a proximal head (410); a shaft (414) extending from the proximal head and having external threads (415) on at least a portion of the shaft; and a chamber (1176) extending internally from the proximal head into the shaft, at least a portion of the chamber having internal threads (1147) along a substantial entirety of a length of the chamber (FIG. 88); wherein the external threads have a first handedness, and the internal threads have a second handedness different from the first handedness (¶283); wherein features of the first handedness of the external threads and the second handedness of the internal threads are governed by a relative torque relationship and wherein the relative torque relationship is determined based on one or more thread geometry parameters of one or both of the external threads and the internal threads (a relative torque relationship inherently exists between thread geometry parameters of the first handedness and the second handedness). Regarding claim 3, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the fastener device is configured to be coupled or mated to an interlock driver tool including distal external threads cooperating with the internal threads of the chamber (FIGS. 101-105). Regarding claim 4, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 3, wherein the fastener device and the interlock driver tool are configured to unscrew from each other while the fastener device is being screwed at least partially into a subject (¶283). Regarding claim 5, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 3, wherein the fastener device and the interlock driver tool are configured to be seated together via the internal threads while the fastener device is being rotated for removal from a subject (FIGS. 101-105). Regarding claim 6, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the fastener device is configured to be coupled or mated to a tool cooperating with the proximal head (FIGS. 101-105). Regarding claim 7, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 6, wherein the proximal head includes a drive recess (416) and the tool cooperates with the proximal head via the drive recess (FIGS. 101-105). Regarding claim 8, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the proximal head includes a drive recess that is one or more of the following shapes/types: slotted, cruciform, square, pentalobular, hexalobular, triangular, or tamper-resistant (FIG. 95). Regarding claim 9, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the fastener device is made of non-ferrous material (¶212). Regarding claim 10, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the fastener device includes a self-tapping tip or a self-drilling tip (419). Regarding claim 11, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the external threads are of a cortical or cancellous thread type (FIG. 92). Regarding claim 12, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the fastener device can be a part of a pedicle screw (intended use statement – there is no reason this fastener device cannot be a part of a pedicle screw). Regarding claim 13, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the fastener device is a cannulated screw with a (partially) hollow core (FIG. 94). Regarding claim 14, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the chamber is at least partly filled or covered with a hydrogel or soluble material (¶303). Regarding claim 21, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the one or more thread geometry parameters include thread pitch, and/or thread profile dimensions (the threads inherently comprise thread pitch and thread profile dimensions). Regarding claim 22, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the one or more thread geometry parameters include a plurality of thread geometry parameters, and wherein the plurality of thread geometry parameters includes thread pitch and thread profile dimensions (the threads inherently comprise thread pitch and thread profile dimensions). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Abbasi. Regarding claim 2, Abbasi discloses the device of claim 1, except does not specify wherein the first handedness is right-handed and the second handedness is left-handed. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to form the threads this way, since right-handed external threads are standard and then it follows that the internal threads would be left-handed due to the “reverse threaded” (¶283) disclosure. In this case, the first handedness is right-handed and the second handedness is left-handed. Response to Arguments Regarding Applicant’s argument that Abbasi fails to disclose “wherein features of the first handedness of the external threads and the second handedness of the internal threads are governed by a relative torque relationship and wherein the relative torque relationship is determined based on one or more thread geometry parameters of one or both of the external threads and the internal threads,” Examiner respectfully disagrees. A relative torque relationship inherently exists between thread geometry parameters of the internal and external threads. Depending on the geometry of the internal thread relative to the external thread, a specific torque relationship occurs. The claim does not specify what the relative torque relationship is, therefore Abbasi meets the claim Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLIVIA C CHANG whose telephone number is (571) 270-5017. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:30AM-5:00PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, KEVIN TRUONG, at (571) 272-4705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLIVIA C CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2025
Application Filed
May 23, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
May 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 15, 2025
Interview Requested
Aug 28, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582419
TIBIAL SUPRAPATELLAR ENTRY PORTAL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12558135
OSSEOUS ANCHORING IMPLANT WITH CORTICAL STABILIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12514623
ORTHOPEDIC PLATE FOR TREATMENT OF TIBIAL FRACTURES AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12514624
BONE FIXATION DEVICE AND METHOD OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12491014
OSTEOSYNTHESIS PLATE SUITABLE AS A REPLACEMENT OF A SYNARTHROSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.3%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 726 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month