Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/059,891

GTLD DOMAIN NAME REGISTRIES RDAP ARCHITECTURE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 21, 2025
Priority
Sep 19, 2016 — CIP of 10/523,632 +2 more
Examiner
RASHID, HARUNUR
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Verisign Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
475 granted / 625 resolved
+16.0% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
653
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
92.9%
+52.9% vs TC avg
§102
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 625 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION 1. Claim 1 is pending in this examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 2. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 3. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 3.1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 3.2. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor regards as the invention. 3.3. The phrase “substantially as shown and described” renders the scope of the claim unclear because the boundaries of the claimed invention cannot be determined with reasonable certainty. 3.4. Claim recites of “method, machine, manufacture, and/or system” improperly mixed statutory classes. Claim is indefinite in that the claims impermissibly mixed multiples distinct classes of patentable subject matter. Conclusion 4.1. a). US Patent Application No. 20160179822 to Gupta et al., discloses a system and method for domain name system (DNS) templates are presented. A DNS template database stores DNS templates. A DNS record database stores a plurality of DNS records for a plurality of domain names. A host computer server receives an electronic signal encoding a request to create a DNS template from a user. The request identifies a domain name. The host computer server is configured to access the DNS record database to retrieve a DNS record for the domain name identified in the request, parse the DNS record into a plurality of DNS settings, display the plurality of DNS settings on a user interface for the user, receive, via the user interface, a selection of at least one of the DNS settings by the user, construct a DNS template using the selection of the at least one of the DNS settings, and store the DNS template in the DNS template database. b). US Patent Application No. 20140006642 to Kothapalli et al., discloses methods and systems are disclosed for quickly providing Whois services to a new top level domain after it is provisioned in a registry. In one embodiment, domain data is received at a first system regarding a top level domain (TLD). The domain data is assigned an authoritative port of a Whois server and is provisioned in a registry database. In certain embodiments, the Whois server provides information relating to domain name registrations of the TLD in the database, according to the authoritative port. The Whois server determines that a Whois query is received at the authoritative port for the queried TLD and responds with the queried information. To the requester, the responses appear as if they are sent from a unique Whois server for each TLD, but the Whois server is actually shared among the TLDs. 4.3. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARUNUR RASHID whose telephone number is (571)270-7195. The examiner can normally be reached 9 AM to 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eleni A. Shiferaw can be reached at (571) 272-3867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HARUNUR . RASHID Primary Examiner Art Unit 2497 /HARUNUR RASHID/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2497
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671466
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12632567
MICRO CONTROLLER UNIT AND SECURITY DIAGNOSIS METHOD THEREOF
1y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625985
METHOD FOR DOCUMENTING INFORMATION
4y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625943
USB PERIPHERAL AUTHENTICATION METHOD, EMBEDDED SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12603869
PRIVACY SOLUTION FOR IMAGES LOCALLY GENERATED AND STORED IN EDGE SERVERS
2y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.3%)
3y 4m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 625 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month