Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/059,977

2T DRAM CELL WITH ASYMMETRIC PARASITIC CAPACITOR AND 2T DRAM CELL ARRAY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 21, 2025
Priority
Feb 23, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0026247 +1 more
Examiner
YANG, HAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
POSTECH Research and Business Development Foundation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
844 granted / 917 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
931
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§102
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 917 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 2. Claim(s) 1-2, 5, 11-13, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over TOMISHIMA et al (Pub. No.: US 2021/0151437) in view of AAPA (Applicant Admitted Prior Art). 3. Regarding independent claim 1, TOMISHIMA et al teaches a 2T DRAM cell (Fig. 4, #400) with an parasitic capacitor (Fig. 4, between #444 to #443, paragraph [0021], lines 19-20), comprising: a write transistor (Fig. 4, #430) having one terminal connected to a write bit line (Fig. 4, BL_W 412) , the other terminal connected to a storage node (Fig. 4, SN 460), and a gate terminal (Fig.4, #434) connected to a write word line (Fig. 4, WL_W 424); a read transistor (Fig. 4, #440) having one terminal connected to a read bit line (Fig. 4, BL_R 414), the other terminal connected to a read word line (Fig. 4, WL_R 422), and a gate terminal (Fig. 4, #444) connected to the storage node (Fig. 4, SN 460); and a parasitic capacitor (Fig. 4, between #444 to #443, paragraph [0021], lines 19-20) formed between the gate terminal of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440) and the other terminal of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440) connected to the read word line (Fig. 4, WL_R 422). TOMISHIMA et al is silent with respect to an asymmetric parasitic capacitor AAPA teaches an asymmetric parasitic capacitor (see AAPA, paragraph [0004], lines 5-8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to apply the teachings of AAPA to the teaching of TOMISHIMA et al such that asymmetric parasitic capacitor has data retention time of at least several hours (see AAPA paragraph [0004], lines 12-13). 4. Regarding claim 2, TOMISHIMA et al teaches the parasitic capacitor (Fig. 4, between #444 to #443, paragraph [0021], lines 19-20) corresponds to an overlapping portion between the gate terminal (Fig. 4, #444) of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440) and an active region of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440) connected to the read word line (Fig. 4, WL_R 422). TOMISHIMA et al is silent with respect to an asymmetric parasitic capacitor AAPA teaches an asymmetric parasitic capacitor (see AAPA, paragraph [0004], lines 5-8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to apply the teachings of AAPA to the teaching of TOMISHIMA et al such that asymmetric parasitic capacitor has data retention time of at least several hours (see AAPA paragraph [0004], lines 12-13). 5. Regarding claim 5, TOMISHIMA et al teaches each of which is connected to a write word line (Fig. 4, WL_W 424), a write bit line (Fig. 4, BL_W 412), a read word line (Fig. 4, WL_R 422), and a read bit line (Fig. 4, BL_R 414),wherein when a read operation is performed on information stored in a selected 2T DRAM cell (Fig. 4, #400) among the plurality of 2T DRAM cells (Fig. 4, #400),a read transistor (Fig. 4, #440) of an unselected 2T DRAM cell (Fig. 4, #400) among the plurality of 2T DRAM cells (Fig. 4, #400) is always turned off by the parasitic capacitor (Fig. 4, between #444 to #443, paragraph [0021], lines 19-20) included in the 2T DRAM cell (Fig. 4, #400). TOMISHIMA et al is silent with respect to an asymmetric parasitic capacitor AAPA teaches an asymmetric parasitic capacitor (see AAPA, paragraph [0004], lines 5-8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to apply the teachings of AAPA to the teaching of TOMISHIMA et al such that asymmetric parasitic capacitor has data retention time of at least several hours (see AAPA paragraph [0004], lines 12-13). 6. Regarding claim 11, TOISHIMA et al teaches a parasitic capacitor (Fig. 4, between #444 to #443, paragraph [0021], lines 19-20) formed by the storage node (Fig. 4, SN 460) and the active region of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440), which are formed in separate layers (see Fig. 4). TOMISHIMA et al is silent with respect to an asymmetric parasitic capacitor AAPA teaches an asymmetric parasitic capacitor (see AAPA, paragraph [0004], lines 5-8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to apply the teachings of AAPA to the teaching of TOMISHIMA et al such that asymmetric parasitic capacitor has data retention time of at least several hours (see AAPA paragraph [0004], lines 12-13). 7. Regarding claim 12, TOMISHIMA et al teaches the insulating layer between the storage node (Fig. 4, SN 460) and the active region of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440) formed on the same layer as the insulating layer (Fig. 7L, #742) between the gate of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440) and the channel of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440). 8. Regarding claim 13, TOMISHIMA et al teaches the insulating layer (Fig. 7L, #742) between the storage node (Fig. 4, SN 460) and the active region (Fig. 7L, between #724-#726) of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440) formed of the same material as the insulating layer (Fig. 7L, #742) between the gate of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440) and the channel of the read transistor (Fig. 4, #440). Allowable Subject Matter 9. Claims 3-4, 6-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 10. With respect to claim 3, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to an overlapping area between the gate terminal of the read transistor constituting the asymmetric parasitic capacitor and an active region of the read transistor connected to the read word line is wider than an overlapping area between the gate terminal of the read transistor and the active region of the read transistor connected to the read bit line. 11. With respect to claim 4, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to a capacitance of the asymmetric parasitic capacitor is greater than a sum of a capacitance of a first parasitic capacitor formed between the gate terminal of the write transistor and the storage node and a capacitance of a second parasitic capacitor formed between the gate terminal of the read transistor and the storage node. 12. With respect to claim 6, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to the selected 2T DRAM cell, a capacitance of the asymmetric parasitic capacitor is set to a value such that a voltage fluctuation rate of the storage node and a voltage fluctuation rate of the read word line have the same value. 13. With respect to claim 7, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to a magnitude of a capacitance of the asymmetric parasitic capacitor is at least 1000 times larger than a sum of a capacitance of a first parasitic capacitor formed between the gate terminal of the write transistor and the storage node and a capacitance of a second parasitic capacitor formed between the gate terminal of the read transistor and the storage node. 14. With respect to claim 8, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to in the unselected 2T DRAM cell, a voltage value fluctuation rate of the storage node is 0(zero). 15. With respect to claim 9, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to a threshold voltage VTH of the read transistor, a voltage VSN(H) corresponding to a logic high stored in the storage node, a voltage VSH(L) corresponding to a logic low stored in the storage node, and a voltage VDD applied to a read word line connected to a selected 2T DRAM cell, when performing a read operation on information stored in the selected 2T DRAM cell satisfy the following Mathematical Formulas: VSN(L) <VTH- VDD < VSN(H) <VTH,and[VTH-VSN(H)]/VDDC<[VTH-VSN(L)]/VDD. 16. With respect to claim 10, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to the asymmetric parasitic capacitor having a capacitance value proportional to the area of the overlapping portion between the storage node and the active region of the read transistor. Conclusion 17. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure, CHUNG (Pub. No: US 2025/0273261). CHUNG (Pub. No: US 2025/0273261) shows 2T0C DRAM cells. 18. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Han Yang whose telephone is (571) 270-3048. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8am-5pm with alternate Friday off. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Richard Elms can be reached on (571) 272-1869. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HY 08/21/2026 /HAN YANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2824
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749542
OPERATION METHOD OF MEMORY, AND MEMORY, MEMORY SYSTEM, AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748895
BLOCKCHAIN-BASED DATA PROCESSING METHOD, DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744070
PLATE LINE DRIVERS WITH A SHARED BIAS DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744067
CONTROL SIGNAL TRAINING
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744062
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEMORY ARRAY AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 917 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month