Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/060,159

MULTILINE RISER BIG BORE CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 21, 2025
Priority
Oct 21, 2022 — provisional 63/418,353 +1 more
Examiner
WOOD, DOUGLAS S
Art Unit
3672
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hydril Company
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
383 granted / 490 resolved
+26.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
537
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§102
43.8%
+3.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 490 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Acknowledgements In the reply filed August 19, 2026, the applicant amended claims 1 and 14. Currently claims 1-20 are under examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lochte (U.S. Patent No. 4,350,371). Regarding Claim 1, Lochte discloses a system for connecting one or more flow lines, the system comprising: A connector housing (Lochte: 16) comprising: At least one inner guide ledge (Lochte: inner surface of 28) formed on a connector housing (Lochte: 16) inner side surface, the at least one inner guide ledge (Lochte: inner surface of 28) comprising a slot (Lochte: 33); and A first connection passage (Lochte: 32) formed through a wall of the connector housing (Lochte: 16); A connector (Lochte: 41, 77) comprising a connector protrusion (Lochte: 89) provided on an outer side surface of the connector (Lochte: 41, 77), wherein the connector protrusion (Lochte: 89) is axially slidable (before 118 is fully engaged) along the at least one inner guide ledge (Lochte: inner surface of 28) and fitted within the slot (Lochte: 33) to rotationally fix the connector (Lochte: 41, 77) within the connector housing (Lochte: 16); and A first annular flow path connection (Lochte: 29) extending annularly between the connector housing (Lochte: 16) and the connector (Lochte: 41, 77), wherein the first annular flow path connection (Lochte: 29) is formed by a first housing annular flow path connection groove formed in an inner surface of the connector housing (Lochte: 16), a first connector (Lochte: 41, 77) annular flow path connection groove formed in an outer side surface of the connector (Lochte: 41, 77), or a combination of the first housing annular flow path connection groove axially aligned with the first connector (Lochte: 41, 77) annular flow path connection groove, wherein the first connection passage (Lochte: 32) through the connector housing (Lochte: 16) intersects with the first annular flow path connection (Lochte: 29). Regarding Claim 2, Lochte discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the connector (Lochte: 41, 77) comprises a connector plate (Lochte: 28) mounted to a top surface of the connector housing (Lochte: 16), where the connector plate (Lochte: 28) comprises a cut-out (Lochte: 34) aligned with an umbilical connection (Lochte: 24). Regarding Claim 3, Lochte discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the connector housing (Lochte: 16) includes a seal (Lochte: 63, 64) extending about a circumference of the inner surface of the connector housing (Lochte: 16) to seal (Lochte: 63, 64) the first annular flow path connection (Lochte: 29). Regarding Claim 4, Lochte discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the connector housing (Lochte: 16) is attached to an end of a frame of a BOP stack (Lochte: 17a, 17b). Regarding Claim 5, Lochte discloses the system of claim 1, wherein: the connector (Lochte: 41, 77) has a body comprising a first bore (Lochte: 69); The first bore (Lochte: 69) being formed through the body of the connector (Lochte: 41, 77). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-20 are allowable Claims 6-13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The use of language directed toward a second housing annular flow path connection groove, and its relationship with the second annular flow path connection, the second bore, the connector (Lochte: 41, 77) and the connector housing (Lochte: 16), when combined with the other limitations of claim 6, would not be obvious to include in the applicant’s invention and is therefore sufficient to distinguish the applicant’s invention from prior art. The use of language directed toward a piston actuated stab and its relationship with the connector, connector housing and first bore, when combined with the other limitations of claim 9 is sufficient to distinguish the applicant’s invention from prior art. The use of language directed toward comprises a sloped guide ledge, wherein the sloped guide ledge extends from a top of the connector housing in an axially downward direction and terminates at the slot, when combined with the other limitations of claim 10 is sufficient to distinguish the applicant’s invention from prior art. The use of language directed toward the placement of a winch-receiving cavity that extends from a bottom surface of the connector and into the body of the connector (and its associated latch, when combined with the other limitations of claim 11, is sufficient to distinguish the applicant’s invention from prior art. The use of language combining the method of providing the connection in a BOP stack, combined with language directed toward the protrusion and slot facilitated rotational alignment (rather than simply rotational fixing) of the connector, specifically: “wherein the connector comprises: a connector protrusion provided on an outer side surface of the connector; and a first bore formed through a body of the connector; inserting the connector into the connector housing, comprising: contacting the connector protrusion to the at least one inner guide ledge; and guiding the connector protrusion along the at least one inner guide ledge to rotationally align the connector within the connector housing as the connector is inserted into the connector housing” when further combined with the other limitations of claim 14, is sufficient to distinguish the applicant’s invention from prior art and obvious variations thereof. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed January 30, 2026, have been fully considered and are not persuasive, however upon further consideration, claims 1-3 and 5 are anticipated by the invention of Lochte as detailed above. Regarding the non-statutory double patenting rejection over Peralez (US 12241315) in view of Watkins (US 4403658), due to the addition of language directed toward the form of the connector protrusion, specifically, that the connector protrusion is “axially slidable along the at least one inner guide ledge” to distinguish the applicant’s invention from these pieces of prior art, the applicant’s arguments are persuasive and the double patenting rejection is withdrawn. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS S WOOD whose telephone number is (571)270-5954. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday 8:30 AM - 7:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole A Coy can be reached at (571) - 272 - 5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DOUGLAS S. WOOD Examiner Art Unit 3672 /DOUGLAS S WOOD/Examiner, Art Unit 3672 /Nicole Coy/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3672
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
May 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 05, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12723488
ARRANGEMENT FOR PREVENTING COLLECTION OF DEBRIS AND CUTTINGS ON THE TOP OF A RISER CLOSURE DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12680423
GUIDE ROD
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680424
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUBSEA FLUID HANDLING
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680411
WELLHEAD FLOW BLOCK AND FLOW CONTROL MECHANISMS
1y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662891
DOWNHOLE TOOL INCLUDING A LOCKING DOG
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 490 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month