Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/061,419

ELECTRONIC DEVICES, METHOD OF TRANSMITTING DATA BLOCK, METHOD OF DETERMINING CONTENTS OF TRANSMISSION SIGNAL, AND TRANSMISSION/RECEPTION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Feb 24, 2025
Priority
Jan 11, 2013 — JP 2013-003346 +5 more
Examiner
SALVUCCI, MATTHEW D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
360 granted / 497 resolved
+12.4% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
529
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
62.2%
+22.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 497 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 9, and 17 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 9, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 12,236,918. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they are generic to all that is recited in Patent 12,236,918 claims 1, 9, and 18 as seen in the table below. The remaining claims are rejected for their dependence to one of the independent claims. Instant Application 19/061419 Patent 12,236,918 Claim 1:A display device, comprising: circuitry configured to: transmit specific Enhanced Extended Display Identification Data (E-EDID) to a repeater device via a Display Data Channel (DDC) of a High Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) cable, wherein the specific E-EDID includes a first Vendor Specific Data Block (VSDB) and a second VSDB, the second VSDB includes a specific field that includes a value changeable from a first value to a second value by the repeater device based on support of at least one extended function, the first VSDB includes four fields that correspond to a physical address of the repeater device, and the specific field is different from each of the four fields; receive an output from the repeater device via at least one Transition Minimized Differential Signaling (TMDS) channel of the HDMI cable, wherein the output corresponds to an output of a transmission device based on the value of the specific field; and output the received output via a display screen. Claim 1:A display device, comprising: circuitry configured to: transmit first Enhanced Extended Display Identification Data (E-EDID) to a repeater device via a Display Data Channel (DDC) of a High Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) cable, wherein the first E-EDID includes a first Vendor Specific Data Block (VSDB) and a second VSDB, the first VSDB includes four fields that correspond to a physical address of the repeater device, and the second VSDB includes a specific field that includes a value changeable from a first value to a second value by the repeater device based on support of at least one extended function, the specific field being different from each of the four fields; receive an output from the repeater device via at least one Transition Minimized Differential Signaling (TMDS) channel of the HDMI cable, the output from the repeater device corresponding to an output of a transmission device, wherein a value of the specific field in E-EDID based on the first E-EDID is for notifying the transmission device of compatibility status to output the output of the transmission device based on compatibility information associated with the at least one extended function; and output the received output via a display screen. Claim 9: A first repeater device, comprising: circuitry configured to: receive first Enhanced Extended Display Identification Data (E-EDID) from a display device via a Display Data Channel (DDC) of a first High Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) cable; transmit a second E-EDID to one of a second repeater device or a transmission device via a DDC of a second HDMI cable, wherein the first E-EDID includes a first Vendor Specific Data Block (VSDB) and a second VSDB, the second VSDB includes a specific field that includes a value changeable from a first value to a second value by the first repeater device based on support of at least one extended function, the first VSDB includes four fields that correspond to a physical address of the first repeater device, and the specific field is different from each of the four fields; receive an output of the transmission device, based on the value of the specific field, from one of the second repeater device or the transmission device via at least one Transition Minimized Differential Signaling (TMDS) channel of the second HDMI cable; and transmit an output corresponding to the received output of the transmission device via at least one TMDS channel of the first HDMI cable. Claim 9: A first repeater device, comprising: circuitry configured to: receive first Enhanced Extended Display Identification Data (E-EDID) from a display device via a Display Data Channel (DDC) of a first High Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) cable; transmit second E-EDID to one of a second repeater device or a transmission device via a DDC of a second HDMI cable, wherein the first E-EDID includes a first Vendor Specific Data Block (VSDB) and a second VSDB, the first VSDB includes four fields that correspond to a physical address of the repeater device, and the second VSDB includes a specific field that includes a value changeable from a first value to a second value by the first repeater device based on support of at least one extended function, the specific field being different from each of the four fields; receive an output of the transmission device from one of the second repeater device or the transmission device via at least one Transition Minimized Differential Signaling (TMDS) channel of the second HDMI cable, wherein a value of the specific field in E-EDID based on the second E-EDID is for notifying the transmission device of compatibility status to output an output based on compatibility information associated with the at least one extended function; and transmit an output corresponding to the received output of the transmission device via at least one TMDS channel of the first HDMI cable Claim 17: A system, comprising: a display device; and a first repeater device that includes first circuitry configured to: receive first Enhanced Extended Display Identification Data (E-EDID) from the display device via a Display Data Channel (DDC) of a first High Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) cable; transmit a second E-EDID to one of a second repeater device or a transmission device via a DDC of a second HDMI cable, wherein the first E-EDID includes a first Vendor Specific Data Block (VSDB) and a second VSDB, the second VSDB includes a specific field having a value changeable from a first value to a second value by the first repeater device based on support of at least one extended function, the first VSDB includes four fields that correspond to a physical address of the first repeater device, and the specific field is different from each of the four fields; receive an output of the transmission device, based on the value of the specific field, from one of the second repeater device or the transmission device via at least one Transition Minimized Differential Signaling (TMDS) channel of the second HDMI cable; and transmit an output based on the received output of the transmission device via at least one TMDS channel of the first HDMI cable, wherein the display device includes second circuitry configured to: transmit the first E-EDID to the first repeater device via the DDC of the first HDMI cable; receive the output corresponding to the output of the transmission device from the first repeater device via the at least one TMDS channel of the first HDMI cable; and output the received output through a display screen. Claim 18: A system, comprising: a first repeater device that includes first circuitry configured to: receive first Enhanced Extended Display Identification Data (E-EDID) from a display device via a Display Data Channel (DDC) of a first High Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) cable; transmit second E-EDID to one of a second repeater device or a transmission device via a DDC of a second HDMI cable, wherein the first E-EDID includes a first Vendor Specific Data Block (VSDB) and a second VSDB, the first VSDB includes four fields that correspond to a physical address of the repeater device, and the second VSDB includes a specific field having a value changeable from a first value to a second value by the first repeater device based on support of at least one extended function, the specific field being different from each of the four fields; receive an output of the transmission device from one of the second repeater device or the transmission device via at least one Transition Minimized Differential Signaling (TMDS) channel of the second HDMI cable, wherein a value of the specific field in E-EDID based on the second E-EDID is for notifying the transmission device of compatibility status to output an output based on compatibility information associated with the at least one extended function; and transmit an output based on the received output of the transmission device via at least one TMDS channel of the first HDMI cable; and the display device including second circuitry configured to: transmit the first E-EDID to the first repeater device via the DDC of the first HDMI cable; receive the output corresponding to the output of the transmission device from the first repeater device via the at least one TMDS channel of the first HDMI cable; and output the received output through a display screen. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW D SALVUCCI whose telephone number is (571)270-5748. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:30-4:00PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, XIAO WU can be reached at (571) 272-7761. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW SALVUCCI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 24, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770366
DATA PROCESSING METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762640
METHOD AND DEVICE OF DYNAMICALLY ADJUSTING RESOLUTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12751793
SELECTING TOOL HEADS FOR A TOOTH PREPARATION
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12755458
SYSTEM AND METHOD TO MAINTAINING GENERATED AI VIDEO
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12737976
METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING STRUCTURAL SEMANTIC MAP UNDER UNDERGROUND WEAK-LIGHT AND LOW-TEXTURE ENVIRONMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.1%)
2y 11m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 497 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month