Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/062,030

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 25, 2025
Examiner
SITTA, GRANT
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Innolux Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
664 granted / 924 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
956
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 924 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yeh (2022/0254305) hereinafter, Yeh in view of Jeon et al (2010/0225637) hereinafter, Jeon. In regards to claim 1, Yeh teaches an electronic device, comprising (abstract): A LED driving apparatus with clock embedded cascaded LED drivers is introduced, including: a plurality of LED drivers, wherein the first stage LED driver receives an original data signal and outputs a first data signal, the Nth stage LED driver receives a (N−1)th data signal and outputs a Nth data signal. The Nth stage LED driver includes a clock data recovery circuit generating a recovery clock signal and a recovery data signal according to the (N−1)th data signal; and a first transmitter outputting the Nth data signal according to the recovery clock signal and the recovery data signal.(Abstract) a first electronic panel (fig. 1 (103)), comprising a plurality of signal lines, wherein the plurality of signal lines are divided into a plurality of signal line groups (fig. 1 OUTR, OURG and OUTB); PNG media_image1.png 434 780 media_image1.png Greyscale a plurality of first signal drivers (fig. 1 (101s)), electrically connected to the plurality of signal line groups respectively, wherein two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other (fig. 1 connection carrying data between 101s)); and [0019] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a LED driving apparatus 100 according to an embodiment of the disclosure. The LED driving apparatus 100 includes a plurality of LED drivers 101, a controller 102, and a plurality of LEDs 103. The plurality of LED drivers 101 include cascaded N stages LED drivers from LED driver 1 to LED driver N, and N is a positive number. The controller 102 outputs an original data signal to the first stage LED driver 1, the first stage LED driver 1 receives the original data signal and outputs a first data signal data_1 to the second stage LED driver 2, and the (N−1)th stage LED driver (N−1) receives a (N−2)th data signal data_(N−2) and outputs the (N−1)th data signal data_(N−1) to the Nth stage LED driver N. a controller (fig. 1 (102)), electrically connected to a first-level signal driver in the plurality of first signal drivers (fig. 1 101 and 102 [0019-0022]), and configured to transmit a clock embedded digital signal to the first-level signal driver, [006-0010,0020-0025,0031] [0006] A LED driving apparatus with clock embedded cascaded LED drivers that are capable of performing data transmission without the common clock signal line and therefore avoiding the limitation of the speed of the data transmission due to the large parasitic capacitance from the common clock signal line and the skew between the common clock signal and the data signal in each of the cascaded LED drivers is introduced. wherein the plurality of first signal drivers use to sequentially transmit the clock embedded digital signal from the first-level signal driver to an N.sup.th-level signal driver in the plurality of first signal drivers in a cascade manner, wherein N is greater than 1 (fig. 1 and fig. 4 (101s, SDIN SDOUT, etc) [0020-0031]. Yeh fails to expressly teach point-to-point connection. However, Jeon teaches point-to-point connection (fig. 1 (200)[0017]). PNG media_image2.png 472 640 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of Yeh to further include point-to-point connection as taught by Jeon in order to help reduce impedance mismatches. In regards to claim 2, Yeh and Jeon to teach the electronic device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the clock embedded digital signal is a differential signal.[0024] Jeon. Claim(s) 3-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yeh and Jeon in view of Kwon et al (2021/0241700) hereinafter, Kwon. In regards to claim 3, Yeh and Jeon fail to expressly teach the electronic device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first electronic panel further comprises: a gate driver, wherein the controller further transmits a gate control signal to the gate driver. Examiner notes scan lines of fig. 1. However, Kwon teaches wherein the first electronic panel further comprises: a gate driver, wherein the controller further transmits a gate control signal to the gate driver. (fig. 1 (130) and GL1). PNG media_image3.png 514 600 media_image3.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of Yeh and Jeon to further include wherein the first electronic panel further comprises: a gate driver, wherein the controller further transmits a gate control signal to the gate driver as taught by Kwon in order to apply the scan signal which applies the data to the pixel. In regards to claim 4, Yeh and Jeon in view of Kwon teaches the electronic device as claimed in claim 3, wherein the controller is disposed on a circuit board, and the controller is electrically connected to the gate driver and the first-level signal driver through a flat cable structure and traces on the circuit board [0031] Yeh in view of (fig. 2 and 3 (110) (205/210) Kwon). In regards to claim 5, Yeh and Jeon in view of Kwon, see rational of claim 3, teaches the electronic device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the controller is disposed on a circuit board, the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to the circuit board through chip-on-film packaging, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through traces on the circuit board. [0031] Yeh in view of (fig. 2 and 3 (110) (205/210) OC7/TD7 [0047] Kwon). Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yeh and Jeon in view of Chen et al (2018/0336828) hereinafter, Chen. In regards to claim 7, Yeh and Jeon fails to teach the electronic device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the controller is disposed on a circuit board, the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to the circuit board through chip-on-film packaging, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through traces on the first electronic panel. However, Chen teaches wherein the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to the circuit board through chip-on-film packaging, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through traces on the first electronic panel.(fig. 2a and 2b 23)[0010, 0048] Chen PNG media_image4.png 814 592 media_image4.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of Yeh and Jeon to further include wherein the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to the circuit board through chip-on-film packaging, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through traces on the first electronic panel reduce cost and increase the life span [0048] Therefore, Yeh and Jeon in view of Chen teaches wherein the controller is disposed on a circuit board, the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to the circuit board through chip-on-film packaging, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through traces on the first electronic panel.(fig. 1 (102, 101s traces) [0031-0035] Yeh in view .(fig. 2a and 2b 23)[0010, 0048] Chen Claim(s) 8 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yeh and Jeon in view of Chen et al (20060202938) hereinafter, Chen2. In regards 8, Yeh fails to teach the electronic device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the plurality of first signal drivers are disposed on the first electronic panel, the controller is disposed on a circuit board, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through a flat cable structure and traces on the circuit board. However, Chen2 teaches wherein the plurality of first signal drivers are disposed on the first electronic panel, the controller is disposed on a circuit board, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through a flat cable structure and traces on the circuit board [007-008] (fig. 1 120 and controller and (130 to 112s)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of Yeh and Jeon to further include wherein the plurality of first signal drivers are disposed on the first electronic panel, the controller is disposed on a circuit board, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through a flat cable structure and traces on the circuit board as taught by Chen2 in order to simplify manufacturing [0007]. In regards to claim 9, Yeh and Jeon fails to teach the electronic device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the plurality of first signal drivers are disposed on the first electronic panel, the controller is disposed on a circuit board, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through traces on the first electronic panel. However, Chen2 teaches wherein the plurality of first signal drivers are disposed on the first electronic panel, the controller is disposed on a circuit board, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through traces on the first electronic panel.[009-0017] (fig. 2a (225 232 and C2/D2 and S/D). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of Yeh and Jeon to further include wherein the plurality of first signal drivers are disposed on the first electronic panel, the controller is disposed on a circuit board, and the two adjacent ones of the plurality of first signal drivers are electrically connected to each other through traces on the first electronic panel as taught by Chen2 in order to decrease the possibility of electrical contact failure.[0008]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 10-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GRANT SITTA whose telephone number is (571)270-1542. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at 571-272-6084. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRANT SITTA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 25, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586548
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING IMAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583323
NON-CONTACT INTERFACE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585341
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO INTERACTIVELY CONTROL DELIVERY OF SERIAL CONTENT USING A HANDHELD DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573165
SHARED 3D PERSPECTIVE VIEWING OF AN ASSET IN AN EXTENDED REALITY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560817
COLOR IMAGERY IN EXTREMELY LOW LIGHT CONDITIONS FOR A HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+11.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 924 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month