Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/062,293

DEVELOPER CONTAINER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 25, 2025
Examiner
ELEY, JESSICA L
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
637 granted / 765 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
795
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§112
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 765 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the last limitation should probably be “the developer housing and the developing chamber come to communicate with each other.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kusano et al. US 2019/0302651 A1 (Kusano) and Matsuzaki et al. US 2019/0113865 (Matsuzaki). Regarding claim 1, Kusano teaches a developer container comprising: a developing roller (22) configured to supply developer to a photosensitive drum; a supplying roller (20) configured to be rotatable and to supply the developer to the developing roller; a developing chamber (18b) provided with the developing roller and the supplying roller; a developer housing (18a) configured to store the developer and having an opening (18c) that communicably connects the developer housing and the developing chamber; and a stirring member (23) provided inside the developer housing and configured to stir the developer, and moreover configured to be rotatable in a same direction as a direction in which the supplying roller rotates (20 rotates “in contact with the developing roller 22” thus it is in the opposite direction of D and thus the same as F, FIG. 3), wherein the developer housing is enabled to be provided with a sealing member (24) for sealing the opening (18c), from a side of the developer housing, in a state where the opening is sealed by the sealing member (24), the sealing member is bonded at an upstream bonded portion (fold-back portion 24c) that is on an upstream side of the opening and also at a downstream bonded portion (24b) that is on a downstream side of the opening, in a rotating direction of the stirring member (¶0056-¶0057), and the developer housing and the developing chamber come to communicate each other as a result of the sealing member peeling off, starting from the upstream bonded portion and then the downstream bonded portion (¶0056-¶0057). Kusano differs from the instant claimed invention by not explicitly disclosing: a height of a rotation shaft of the stirring member is equal to or higher than a height of a rotation shaft of the supplying roller, in a gravitational direction. However this is a known configuration. Matsuzaki teaches a height of a rotation shaft (20) of the stirring member (21b) is equal to or higher than a height of a rotation shaft of the supplying roller (23), in a gravitational direction (FIG. 3). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the developer container taught by Kusano as taught by Matsuzaki in order for the developer container taught by Kusano to be compatible with the type of image forming apparatus taught by Matsuzaki (FIG. 1). Regarding claim 2, Kusano and Matsuzaki teach the developer container according to claim 1. Furthermore Kusano teaches a one-end side of the sealing member is attached to a rotation shaft of the stirring member (24a), an another-end side of the sealing member is bonded at the upstream bonded portion and at the downstream bonded portion in a state where the opening is kept sealed with the sealing member (FIG. 3), the upstream bonded portion (24c) of the sealing member is positioned nearer to the one-end side than the downstream bonded portion (FIG. 3), and the sealing member (24) is configured to peel off starting from the upstream bonded portion, and then the downstream bonded portion in conjunction with rotation of the stirring member (¶0056-¶0057). Regarding claim 3, Kusano teaches a developer container comprising: a developing roller (22) configured to supply developer to a photosensitive drum; a supplying roller (20) configured to be rotatable and to supply the developer to the developing roller; a developing chamber (18b) provided with the developing roller and the supplying roller; a developer housing (18a) configured to store the developer and having an opening (18c) that communicably connects the developer housing and the developing chamber; and a stirring member (23) provided inside the developer housing and configured to stir the developer, and moreover configured to be rotatable in a same direction as a direction in which the supplying roller rotates (20 rotates “in contact with the developing roller 22” thus it is in the opposite direction of D and thus the same as F, FIG. 3), wherein the developer housing is enabled to be provided with a sealing member (24) for sealing the opening (18c), from a side of the developer housing, in a state where the opening is sealed by the sealing member (24), the sealing member is bonded at an upstream bonded portion (fold-back portion 24c) that is on an upstream side of the opening and also at a downstream bonded portion (24b) that is on a downstream side of the opening, in a rotating direction of the stirring member (¶0056-¶0057), and the sealing member (24) includes a part that is attached to a rotation shaft of the stirring member (24a), a part that is bonded at the upstream bonded portion (24b), and a part bonded at the downstream bonded portion (24c), in this order, along a direction from a one-end side toward an another-end side (FIG. 3). Kusano differs from the instant claimed invention by not explicitly disclosing: a height of a rotation shaft of the stirring member is equal to or higher than a height of a rotation shaft of the supplying roller, in a gravitational direction. However this is a known configuration. Matsuzaki teaches a height of a rotation shaft (20) of the stirring member (21b) is equal to or higher than a height of a rotation shaft of the supplying roller (23), in a gravitational direction (FIG. 3). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the developer container taught by Kusano as taught by Matsuzaki in order for the developer container taught by Kusano to be compatible with the type of image forming apparatus taught by Matsuzaki (FIG. 1). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSICA L ELEY whose telephone number is (571)272-9793. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM CST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Jr. Lindsay can be reached on (571)272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSICA L ELEY/ Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 25, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12591200
DRIVING FORCE RECEIVING MEMBER AND PROCESS CARTRIDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585216
IMAGE HEATING DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12572094
FIXING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566391
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566392
BELT CONVEYANCE DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 765 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month