Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/062,475

USER TERMINAL DEVICE AND DISPLAYING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Feb 25, 2025
Examiner
SADIO, INSA
Art Unit
2628
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
660 granted / 817 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+5.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
828
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 817 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. The patent claims include all of the limitations of the instant application claims, respectively. The patent claims also include additional limitations. Hence, the instant application claims are generic to the species of invention covered by the respective patent claims. As such, the instant application claims are anticipated by the patent claims and are therefore not patentably distinct therefrom. (See Eli Lilly and Co. v. Barr Laboratories Inc., 58 USPQ2D 1869, "a later genus claim limitation is anticipated by, and therefore not patentably distinct from, an earlier species claim", In re Goodman, 29 USPQ2d 2010, "Thus, the generic invention is 'anticipated' by the species of the patented invention" and the instant “application claims are generic to species of invention covered by the patent claim, and since without terminal disclaimer, extant species claims preclude issuance of generic application claims”). Claims 1-18 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-18 of U.S. Patent No. 12,248,662. The present application claims the same subject matter of user terminal device and displaying method thereof, which is same as the US patent 12,248,662. For example: 19/062,475 12,248,662 1. An electronic apparatus comprising: a display including a first area and a second area divided with reference to a folding line; a memory storing instructions; and a processor configured to execute the instructions to: control the display to display a first screen on the first area and the second area while the display is in an unfolded state, wherein the first screen includes a plurality of user interface (UI) elements, and based on a folding of the display with reference to the folding line being detected while the first screen is displayed, control the display to display a part of the first screen on the second area and display a second screen on the first area, wherein at least one UI element of the plurality of UI elements displayed on the first screen is moved toward the second screen. 1. An electronic apparatus comprising: a display divided into a first area and a second area with reference to a folding line; a memory storing instructions; and a processor configured to execute the instructions to: control the display to display a first screen on the first area and the second area, based on a folding of the display being detected while the first screen is displayed, control the display to display a part of the first screen on the second area and display a second screen on the first area. 2. The electronic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second screen comprises a user interface (UI) for controlling an application displayed on the second area. 2. The electronic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second screen comprises an UT for controlling an application displayed on the second area, and wherein the first screen is larger than the second screen. 3. The electronic apparatus of claim 2, wherein the UI comprises at least one icon for controlling an operation of the application. 3. The electronic apparatus of claim 2, wherein the application is a camera application, and the UI comprises an UI element for controlling an operation of the camera application. 3. The electronic apparatus of claim 2, wherein the UI comprises at least one icon for controlling an operation of the application. 4. The electronic apparatus of claim 2, wherein the UT comprises an UI element for checking a state of the electronic apparatus. 4. The electronic apparatus of claim 2, wherein the UI comprises at least one icon for checking a current state of the electronic apparatus. 5. The electronic apparatus of claim 2, wherein the processor is further configured to control an operation of the electronic apparatus through the UT. 5. The electronic apparatus of claim 2, wherein the processor is further configured to: control an operation of the electronic apparatus through the UI. 6. The electronic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to, based on the folding of the display with reference to the folding line being detected, remove the at least one UT element from the first screen. 6. The electronic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first screen comprises a plurality of icons, and wherein the processor is further configured to, based on a folding of the display being detected, remove the plurality of icons from the first screen. 7. The electronic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first screen comprises a first image, and the part of the first screen comprises a reduced first image. 7. The electronic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first screen comprises a first image, and the part of the first screen comprises a reduced first image. 8. The electronic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to, while the display is folded with reference to the folding line, control the display to provide a visual effect of changing at least one UI element of the first screen. 8. The electronic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to: while the display is folded, control the display to provide a visual effect of changing at least one object of the first screen. 9. The electronic apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a hinge for folding or unfolding the display. 9. The electronic apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a hinge for folding or unfolding the display. 10. A method of controlling an electronic apparatus including a display including a first area and a second area divided with reference to a folding line, the method comprising: displaying a first screen on the first area and the second area while the display is in an unfolded state, wherein the first screen comprises a plurality of user interface (UI) elements, and,2 based on a folding of the display with reference to the folding line being detected while the first screen is displayed, displaying a part of the first screen on the second area and displaying a second screen on the first area, wherein at least one UI element of the plurality of UI elements displayed on the first screen is moved toward the second screen. I1. The method of claim 10, wherein the second screen comprises an UT for controlling an application displayed on the second area, and wherein the first screen is larger than the second screen. 10. A method of controlling an electronic apparatus including a display divided into a first area and a second area with reference to a folding line, the method comprising: displaying a first screen on the first area and the second area, based on a folding of the display being detected while the first screen is displayed, displaying a part of the first screen on the second area and display a second screen on the first area. 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the second screen comprises an UI for controlling an application displayed on the second area, and wherein the first screen is larger than the second screen. 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the second screen includes a user interface (UI) for controlling an application displayed on the second area. 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the application is a camera application, and the UI includes an UI element for controlling an operation of the camera application. 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the UI includes at least one icon for controlling an operation of the application. 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the UI includes an UI element for checking a current state of the electronic apparatus. 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the UI includes at least one icon for checking a current state of the electronic apparatus. 14. The method of claim 11, wherein an operation of the electronic apparatus is controlled through the UI. 14. The method of claim 11, wherein an operation of the electronic apparatus is controlled through the UI. 15. The method of claim 10, further comprising, based on the folding of the display with reference to the folding line being detected, removing the at least one UI element from the first screen. 15. The method of claim 10, wherein the first screen includes a plurality of icons, and wherein the method further comprises, based on a folding of the display being detected, removing the plurality of icons from the first screen. 16. The method of claim 10, wherein the first screen includes a first image, and the part of the first screen includes a reduced first image. 16. The method of claim 10, wherein the first screen includes a first image, and the part of the first screen includes a reduced first image. 17. The method of claim 10, further comprising, while the display is folded with reference to the folding line, displaying a visual effect of changing at least one UI element of the first screen. 17. The method of claim 10, further comprising, while the display is folded, displaying a visual effect of changing at least one object of the first screen. 18. The method of claim 10, wherein the electronic apparatus further includes a hinge for folding or unfolding the display. 18. The method of claim 10, wherein the electronic apparatus further includes a hinge for folding or unfolding the display. Claims 1-18 are allowable over the prior art of record. The rejection(s) under the obvious double patenting rejection, set forth in this Office action, would need to be overcome. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to INSA SADIO whose telephone number is (571)270-5580. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am-6:00 am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NITIN K PATEL can be reached at 571-272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. INSA . SADIO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2628 /INSA SADIO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 25, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585149
Liquid Crystal On Silicon Display Device Having Stacked Integrated Circuit Substrates
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587630
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR DISPLAYING 3D IMAGE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579937
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS, DRIVING APPARATUS AND MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578598
LIGHT CONTROL SHEETS AND METHODS OF PRODUCING LIGHT CONTROL SHEETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12579939
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+5.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 817 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month