Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 19/062,779

PNEUMATIC TUBE SYSTEM WITH SECURE CARRIER STORAGE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 25, 2025
Priority
Jan 19, 2021 — provisional 63/199,709 +1 more
Examiner
DILLON JR, JOSEPH A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Pevco Systems International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
806 granted / 993 resolved
+21.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
999
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§102
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§112
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 993 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Drawings The subject matter of this application admits of illustration by a new drawing to facilitate understanding of the invention. Applicant is required to furnish a drawing under 37 CFR 1.81(c). No new matter may be introduced in the required drawing. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). The arrangement of claim(s) 15 & 17 have not been depicted. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 13-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Valerino (9,540,187). Valerino (9,540,187) disclose(s): pneumatic tube(s) system, figure(s) 1; workstation 105; carriers, 155; vault 145 comprising a multi-port diverter, 135, 140 and the tube(s) in between; at least one carrier port 135; at least one servicing port 140; blower 130. Note Valerino (9,540,187) disclose(s) at least one servicing port 140 that directly services the workstation 105. Conclusion Claims 16-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Holmes (11,908,265) disclose(s) separated workstation and vault but lack(s) sufficient vault structure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH A DILLON JR whose telephone number is (571)272-6913. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday; 8AM-6:30PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mike McCullough can be reached on (571)272-7805. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned are (703)305-7687 for regular communications and (703)308-0552 for After Final communications. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the receptionist whose telephone number is (703)308-1134. /JOSEPH A DILLON JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 25, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734564
SCALABLE CABIN SYSTEM FOR SPOT PROCESSING OF A SURFACE, MOBILE CABIN, AND METHOD HERETO
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735276
RECEIVER, ASSEMBLIES, AND METHODS FOR LOADING AND EXTRACTING PRODUCT IN ELEVATED TOWER
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729076
APPARATUS FOR CONVEYING POLYOLEFIN PARTICLES
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729077
DECOMPRESSING UNIT FOR AN APPARATUS FOR CONVEYING POLYMER PARTICLES
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721427
ACCESS TABLE SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 2m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 993 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month