Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/062,840

ADJUSTABLE HEEL SUPPORT MEMBER FOR ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 25, 2025
Priority
Feb 09, 2011 — continuation of 9095188 +5 more
Examiner
PRANGE, SHARON M
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nike Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
483 granted / 895 resolved
-16.0% vs TC avg
Strong +47% interview lift
Without
With
+46.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
949
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
85.4%
+45.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§112
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 895 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. This is in response to Applicant’s amendment in which claims 1, 5, 7-14, and 16 have been amended, claims 3, 4, and 6 have been canceled, and claims 1-2, 5, and 7-20 remain pending. Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 03/30/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of US Patent Numbers 9,095,188; 9,795,187; 10,568,386; 11,253,027; 11,918,075; and 12,262,789 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 14, 16, 17, 19, and 20 is/are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Keen et al. (US 7,631,440), herein Keen. Regarding claim 14, Keen discloses an article of footwear (600), comprising: an upper (608); a sole structure (602) coupled to the upper; and a heel cup (heel portion of 604) comprising: a base portion (104b) disposed between the upper and the sole structure such that the base portion is sandwiched between the upper and the sole structure; a side lobe (medial rearmost finger 112) extending from the base portion, wherein the side lobe is at a heel portion of the article of footwear (Fig. 1C, 9A); and a fastener receiving portion (124) extending from the side lobe and configured to capture a fastener (118); wherein the fastener receiving portion includes an engaging portion (inner surface of 124) spaced apart from a surface (surface of receptacle 130) of the side lobe and configured to prevent the fastener from sliding off the fastener receiving portion (column 9, lines 42-45, 59-63); wherein the fastener fits between the engaging portion and the surface of the side lobe; wherein the fastener receiving portion is a medial fastener receiving portion (column 12, lines 59-61), the side lobe is a medial lobe, the heel cup further comprises a central lobe (114) and central fastener receiving portion (116) disposed at a distal end of the central lobe, and the central fastener receiving portion defines at least one guide channel sized to receive the fastener (column 7, line 62-column 8, line 6); and wherein a medial portion of the fastener extends outwardly from the at least one guide channel and toward the medial lobe (Fig. 1A); wherein the heel cup further comprises a lateral lobe (lateral rearmost finger 112) extending from the base portion, and a lateral fastener receiving portion (116) coupled to the lateral lobe that captures the fastener; and wherein, when the fastener is captured by the medial fastener receiving portion and the lateral fastener receiving portion and tightened, the fastener pulls the medial lobe back towards the central lobe and the lateral lobe back towards the central lobe (column 7, line 6-column 8, line 6; column 9, lines 21-66; column 12, lines 59-61; column 15, lines 1-17; Fig. 1A-1G, 9A-9C). Regarding claim 16, Keen discloses that the medial fastener receiving portion and the lateral fastener receiving portion are mirror images of each other (wherein the medial and lateral fastener receiving portions are located symmetrically on either side of the footwear). Regarding claim 17, Keen discloses that the medial lobe is spaced apart from the central lobe by a medial gap, the central fastener receiving portion includes a central fastener receiving body, the central fastener receiving body defines the at least one guide channel extending through the central fastener receiving body from a medial side of the central fastener receiving portion to a lateral side of the central fastener receiving portion, and the at least one guide channel receives the fastener (Fig. 1A, 1C, 1G). Regarding claims 19 and 20, Keen discloses that the heel cup is a distinct and separate component from the upper and the sole structure (column 15, lines 16-17; Fig. 1B, 9A). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 5, 7-13 are allowed. Claims 15 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHARON M PRANGE whose telephone number is (571)270-5280. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khoa Huynh can be reached at (571) 272-4888. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHARON M PRANGE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 25, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672696
SOLE AND ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR HAVING A POD ASSEMBLY
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667166
LOCKING DEVICE FOR A SPORTS SHOE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12653263
Footwear Having Sensor System
5y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12635759
PLANTAR ORTHOSIS
4y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635761
RAPID-ENTRY FOOTWEAR HAVING A COMPRESSIBLE LATTICE STRUCTURE
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+46.9%)
3y 4m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 895 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month