Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/063,156

BLOWER PROTECTION STRUCTURE OF A SEATBACK, AND VEHICLE SEAT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 25, 2025
Priority
Mar 04, 2024 — JP 2024-032466
Examiner
WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
SUBARU Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1819 granted / 2204 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
2224
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2204 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
August 5, 2026 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukuda (U.S. Patent No. 10,625,565 B2) in view of GRÜNEWALD et al (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2018/0162244 A1). PNG media_image1.png 170 266 media_image1.png Greyscale Fukuda teaches the structure substantially as claimed including a blower protection structure of a seatback, comprising: a pair of left and right lumbar wires 13,14 spanning between an upper portion and a lower portion of a seatback frame of a vehicle seat; a mounting bracket 12 mounted directly or indirectly to the left and right lumbar wires 13,14; a blower 12 disposed at a seatback rear side with respect to the mounting bracket but is silent as to whether or not it includes an urging portion urging the blower toward a mounting bracket side. However, GRÜNEWALD et al. teach the concept of an urging portion that can be used to secure the blower to a mounting bracket and urging toward a mounting bracket side (see paragraph [0022] where it reads “The seat ventilation device 5 can also be suspended in the foam using rubber bands for acoustic decoupling.”). It would have been obvious and well within the level of ordinary skill in the art to modify the blower protection cover, as taught by Fukuda, to include an urging portion urging the blower toward a mounting bracket side, as taught by GRÜNEWALD et al., since it would allow the blower to be removably coupled to the mounting bracket of the vehicle seat. As for claim 2, Fukuda teaches that the blower is mounted to a seatback rear side surface of the mounting bracket. As for Claim 8, both Fukada teaches a vehicle seat, comprising: a seat cushion on which an occupant sits; and a seatback supporting a back of the occupant, wherein the seatback has the blower protection structure of a seatback. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Rodney B. White whose telephone number is (571)272-6863. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David R. Dunn can be reached at (571) 272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Rodney B White/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 25, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740646
ADAPTABLE SEAT
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741742
LATCH ASSEMBLY WITH SLIDING LATCH AND ROTATING CATCH
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741573
VEHICLE SEAT
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733739
EXTENDABLE POSTURAL SUPPORT CUSHION
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735133
TRAVEL ADJUST FEATURES FOR A DROPPER SEATPOST ASSEMBLY
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.8%)
1y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2204 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month