Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 19/063,758

AUTONOMOUS TRAVELING ROBOT OPERATION SYSTEM, AUTONOMOUS TRAVELING ROBOT OPERATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Feb 26, 2025
Priority
Mar 06, 2024 — JP 2024-034184
Examiner
YANG, WENYUAN
Art Unit
3667
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
98 granted / 146 resolved
+15.1% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
179
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§103
53.8%
+13.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 146 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to Applicant's Amendment and Remarks filed on 6/22/2026. This Action is made FINAL. Claims 1-5, 7-9 are pending for examination. Response to Arguments (A) Applicant’s arguments, see page 5, filed “As discussed during the interview, absent specific and unambiguous identification of claim language that is allegedly indefinite, Applicant respectfully submits that the claims satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112(b). Nevertheless, a portion of the claims have been amended herein for which Applicant submits that the amendments satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §112(b).Withdrawal of the rejection is respectfully requested” on 6/22/2026, with respect to Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 have been fully considered and are persuasive. As to point (A), the Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 of 1-9 has been withdrawn. (B) Applicant's arguments filed “Applicant respectfully submits that Yamamoto fails to disclose the features of amended independent claim 1. In particular, Yamamoto fails to disclose the features of amended independent claim 1 regarding an adverbial operation of a motion of the autonomous traveling robot is input by using the handwritten input interface or the voice input interface, and as similarly recited in independent claims 8 and 9. A portion of these features is recited in dependent claim 6, which has been incorporated into independent claims 1, 8, and 9, and subsequently cancelled without prejudice or disclaimer.” on 6/22/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. As to point (B), the examiner respectfully disagrees. The examiner further notes Yamamoto fully disclosed the claimed limitation in Para 73-79. In particular, Yamamoto disclosed a process of receiving input and controlling the robot to performing the operation which would fully encompass the amended limitation of “an adverbial operation of a motion of the autonomous traveling robot is input by using the handwritten input interface or the voice input interface” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yamamoto (US20210178581A1). Regarding claim 1, Yamamoto teaches An autonomous traveling robot operation system comprising: an autonomous traveling robot configured to shoot an environment near the autonomous traveling robot and operates an object(Yamamoto: Fig. 1; Para 36 “The robot 100 shoots the first environment in which the robot 100 is located by a stereo camera 131 (an imaging unit), and transmits the shot image to the remote terminal 300 via the Internet 600”; Para 31 “The robot 100 performs a grasping motion or the like by a hand 124 in accordance with an operation of the remote terminal 300 by the user”); a handwritten input interface configured to display an image shot by the autonomous traveling robot and receive a handwritten input to the displayed image(Yamamoto: Fig. 1; Para 37 “The remote terminal 300 is, for example, a tablet terminal, and includes a display panel 341 on which a touch panel is superimposed. The shot image received from the robot 100 is displayed on the display panel 341, and thus a user can indirectly view the first environment in which the robot 100 is located. Further, a user can input handwritten input information by handwriting to the shot image displayed on the display panel 341. The handwritten input information is, for example, information indicating an object to be grasped which has been requested to be grasped by the hand 124, a way of performing a grasping motion with regard to the object to be grasped, and the like.”); and a voice input interface configured to receive a voice input related to the object (Yamamoto: Para 110: Para “a user may utter in a microphone or the like of the remote terminal 300, and the remote terminal 300 may recognize the content of this user's utterance by using a common voice recognition technique, convert it into text information, and use the converted text information as text information of a user's utterance”), wherein the autonomous traveling robot operation system operates the autonomous traveling robot in such a way that the autonomous traveling robot operates the object in accordance with instructions of the handwritten input and the voice input(Yamamoto: Fig. 1, 10, and 12; Para 97: “Upon receiving the handwritten input information which a user has input to the shot imager from the remote terminal 300, the estimation unit 152 of the robot 100, based on this handwritten input information and a conversation history of the text chat, estimates an object to be grasped which has been requested to be grasped by the hand 124 and estimates a way of performing a grasping motion by the hand 124, the grasping motion having been requested to be performed with regard to the estimated object to be grasped (Step S13). At this time, the estimation unit 152 acquires from the recognition unit 151 the information of the objects that can be grasped shown in the shot image to which the handwritten input information is input, and estimates the object to be grasped from among the objects that can be grasped based on the handwritten input information and the conversation history of the text chat. Further, the estimation unit 152 analyzes the content of the handwritten input information and the content of the conversation history of the text chat, and performs the above-described estimation while at the same time confirming the analyzed contents with the remote terminal 300 using the text information of the text chat”; Para 98 “After that, the control unit 150 of the robot 100 generates a trajectory of the hand 124 for enabling the grasping motion that has been requested to be performed with regard to the object to be grasped (Step S14). When the control unit 150 has generated a trajectory of the hand 124, the control unit 150 controls the upper-body drive unit 146 in accordance with the generated trajectory, whereby the grasping motion is performed by the hand 124 with regard to the object to be grasped (Step S15)”), and an adverbial operation of a motion of the autonomous traveling robot is input by using the handwritten input interface or the voice input interface(Yamamoto: Para 73 “the estimation unit 152 analyzes (i.e., determines) that a way of performing a grasping motion is to hold and lift the object to be grasped based on the text information of “Get this”. Further, the estimation unit 152 analyzes (i.e., determines) that the object to be grasped among the objects that can be grasped which the recognition unit 151 has recognized is the smartphone 403 located at the input position of the handwritten input information 931 based on the handwritten input information 931. Note that the estimation unit 152 can recognize the input position of the handwritten input information 931 on the shot image 311 by any method. For example, if the remote terminal 300 includes, in the handwritten input information 931, position information indicating the input position of the handwritten input information 931 on the shot image 311 and transmits this handwritten input information 931, the estimation unit 152 can recognize the input position of the handwritten input information 931 based on this position information. Alternatively, if the remote terminal 300 transmits the shot image 311 processed into a state in which the handwritten input information 931 has been input, the estimation unit 152 can recognize the input position of the handwritten input information 931 based on this shot image 311”; Para 74 “in order to confirm with a user that the object to be grasped is the smartphone 403, the estimation unit 152 generates text information (the text box 921) of a response utterance “Okay. Is it a smartphone?” and transmits the generated text information to the remote terminal 300”; Para 75 “the robot 100 receives text information (the text box 912) of a user's utterance “Yes. Bring it to me” from the remote terminal 300. Thus, the estimation unit 152 estimates that the object to be grasped which has been requested to be grasped by the hand 124 is the smartphone 403, and that a way of performing a grasping motion is to hold and lift the smartphone 403”; Para 77 “the estimation unit 152 analyzes (i.e., determines), based on the text information of “Bring it to me”, that an additionally requested motion of the robot 100 is to convey the smartphone 403 held by the grasping motion to “me”; Para 78 “in order to confirm where “me” is, the estimation unit 152 generates text information (the text box 923) of a response utterance “Are you in the living room?” and transmits the generated text information to the remote terminal 300”; Para 79 “the robot 100 receives text information (the text box 913) of a user's utterance “Yes, thank you” from the remote terminal 300. Thus, the estimation unit 152 estimates that the robot 100 has been additionally requested to convey the smartphone 403 to the living room. Consequently, the estimation unit 152 estimates that the overall motion which the robot 100 has been requested to perform is to hold the smartphone 403 and convey it to the living room”) Regarding claim 2, Yamamoto teaches The autonomous traveling robot operation system according to claim 1, wherein the voice input interface enables a user to have a conversation with the autonomous traveling robot using a voice recognition unit that receives a voice(Yamamoto: Para 110: Para “a user may utter in a microphone or the like of the remote terminal 300, and the remote terminal 300 may recognize the content of this user's utterance by using a common voice recognition technique, convert it into text information, and use the converted text information as text information of a user's utterance”), recognizes the voice, and outputs the motion, the voice recognition unit being configured by performing machine learning, and inputs the motion of the autonomous traveling robot(Yamamoto: Para 110: Para “a user may utter in a microphone or the like of the remote terminal 300, and the remote terminal 300 may recognize the content of this user's utterance by using a common voice recognition technique, convert it into text information, and use the converted text information as text information of a user's utterance”; Para 68 “The learned model 181 is a neural network learned from teaching data which is a combination of an image showing objects that can be grasped by the hand 124 and a correct answer to which area of the image is the object that can be grasped. At this time, by preparing the teaching data so as to further indicate the names of the objects that can be grasped, the distances to the objects that can be grasped, and the directions in which the objects that can be grasped are located shown in the image, the learned model 181, which uses the shot image as an input image, can output not only the objects that can be grasped but also the names of the objects that can be grasped, the distances to the objects that can be grasped, and the directions in which the objects that can be grasped are located”; Para 97: “Upon receiving the handwritten input information which a user has input to the shot imager from the remote terminal 300, the estimation unit 152 of the robot 100, based on this handwritten input information and a conversation history of the text chat, estimates an object to be grasped which has been requested to be grasped by the hand 124 and estimates a way of performing a grasping motion by the hand 124, the grasping motion having been requested to be performed with regard to the estimated object to be grasped (Step S13). At this time, the estimation unit 152 acquires from the recognition unit 151 the information of the objects that can be grasped shown in the shot image to which the handwritten input information is input, and estimates the object to be grasped from among the objects that can be grasped based on the handwritten input information and the conversation history of the text chat. Further, the estimation unit 152 analyzes the content of the handwritten input information and the content of the conversation history of the text chat, and performs the above-described estimation while at the same time confirming the analyzed contents with the remote terminal 300 using the text information of the text chat”; Para 98 “After that, the control unit 150 of the robot 100 generates a trajectory of the hand 124 for enabling the grasping motion that has been requested to be performed with regard to the object to be grasped (Step S14). When the control unit 150 has generated a trajectory of the hand 124, the control unit 150 controls the upper-body drive unit 146 in accordance with the generated trajectory, whereby the grasping motion is performed by the hand 124 with regard to the object to be grasped (Step S15)”). Regarding claim 3, Yamamoto teaches The autonomous traveling robot operation system according to claim 1, wherein an instruction is sent to the object that is not displayed on the image using the voice input interface(Yamamoto: Fig. 12; Para 110: Para “a user may utter in a microphone or the like of the remote terminal 300, and the remote terminal 300 may recognize the content of this user's utterance by using a common voice recognition technique, convert it into text information, and use the converted text information as text information of a user's utterance”; Para 77 “the estimation unit 152 analyzes (i.e., determines), based on the text information of “Bring it to me”, that an additionally requested motion of the robot 100 is to convey the smartphone 403 held by the grasping motion to “me”; Para “Then, in order to confirm where “me” is, the estimation unit 152 generates text information (the text box 923) of a response utterance “Are you in the living room?” and transmits the generated text information to the remote terminal 300”; Para 79 “the robot 100 receives text information (the text box 913) of a user's utterance “Yes, thank you” from the remote terminal 300. Thus, the estimation unit 152 estimates that the robot 100 has been additionally requested to convey the smartphone 403 to the living room. Consequently, the estimation unit 152 estimates that the overall motion which the robot 100 has been requested to perform is to hold the smartphone 403 and convey it to the living room”; i.e. perform is to hold the smartphone and convey it to the living room is not displayed in the image). Regarding claim 4, Yamamoto teaches The autonomous traveling robot operation system according to claim 1, wherein the handwritten input interface inputs the object using an object estimation unit configured to perform machine learning so as to receive the image as an input, estimate an object in the image, and output a result of the estimation robot(Yamamoto: Para: 60 “The learned model 181 is a learned model that uses a shot image as an input image and outputs objects that can be grasped shown in the shot image”; Para 68 “The learned model 181 is a neural network learned from teaching data which is a combination of an image showing objects that can be grasped by the hand 124 and a correct answer to which area of the image is the object that can be grasped. At this time, by preparing the teaching data so as to further indicate the names of the objects that can be grasped, the distances to the objects that can be grasped, and the directions in which the objects that can be grasped are located shown in the image, the learned model 181, which uses the shot image as an input image, can output not only the objects that can be grasped but also the names of the objects that can be grasped, the distances to the objects that can be grasped, and the directions in which the objects that can be grasped are located”). Regarding claim 5, Yamamoto teaches The autonomous traveling robot operation system according to claim 1, wherein a trajectory of the autonomous traveling robot is input by using the handwritten input interface(Yamamoto: Fig. 1; Para 37 “The remote terminal 300 is, for example, a tablet terminal, and includes a display panel 341 on which a touch panel is superimposed. The shot image received from the robot 100 is displayed on the display panel 341, and thus a user can indirectly view the first environment in which the robot 100 is located. Further, a user can input handwritten input information by handwriting to the shot image displayed on the display panel 341. The handwritten input information is, for example, information indicating an object to be grasped which has been requested to be grasped by the hand 124, a way of performing a grasping motion with regard to the object to be grasped, and the like”). Regarding claim 7, Yamamoto teaches The autonomous traveling robot operation system according to claim 1, wherein the autonomous traveling robot is operated to perform grasping, cutting, moving, screw fixing, or welding(Yamamoto: Fig. 1, 10, and 12; Para 97 “Upon receiving the handwritten input information which a user has input to the shot imager from the remote terminal 300, the estimation unit 152 of the robot 100, based on this handwritten input information and a conversation history of the text chat, estimates an object to be grasped which has been requested to be grasped by the hand 124 and estimates a way of performing a grasping motion by the hand 124, the grasping motion having been requested to be performed with regard to the estimated object to be grasped (Step S13). At this time, the estimation unit 152 acquires from the recognition unit 151 the information of the objects that can be grasped shown in the shot image to which the handwritten input information is input, and estimates the object to be grasped from among the objects that can be grasped based on the handwritten input information and the conversation history of the text chat. Further, the estimation unit 152 analyzes the content of the handwritten input information and the content of the conversation history of the text chat, and performs the above-described estimation while at the same time confirming the analyzed contents with the remote terminal 300 using the text information of the text chat”; Para 98 “After that, the control unit 150 of the robot 100 generates a trajectory of the hand 124 for enabling the grasping motion that has been requested to be performed with regard to the object to be grasped (Step S14). When the control unit 150 has generated a trajectory of the hand 124, the control unit 150 controls the upper-body drive unit 146 in accordance with the generated trajectory, whereby the grasping motion is performed by the hand 124 with regard to the object to be grasped (Step S15)”). As per claim 8, it recites An autonomous traveling robot operation method having limitations similar to those of claim 1 and therefore is rejected on the same basis. As per claim 9, it recites A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a program for causing an information processing apparatus to operate an autonomous traveling robot having limitations similar to those of claim 1 and therefore is rejected on the same basis. Yamamoto further teaches non-transitory computer readable medium(Yamamoto: Para 59 “A memory 180 is a nonvolatile storage medium. For example, a solid-state drive is used for the memory 180. The memory 180 stores, in addition to a control program for controlling the robot 100, various parameter values, functions, lookup tables, and the like used for the control and the calculation. In particular, the memory 180 stores a learned model 181, an utterance DB 182, and a map DB 183”). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. ROH (US20200130197A1) disclosed a voice input unit configured to receive a voice input of a user; a first display capable of receiving a touch input; a second display larger than the first display; and a controller configured to perform control such that a screen to be displayed in response to the voice input or the touch input is displayed on at least one of the first display or the second display based on a type and an amount of information included in the screen, and accordingly, it is possible to provide information and services more effectively using two displays. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WENYUAN YANG whose telephone number is (571)272-5455. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 9:00AM-5:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hitesh Patel can be reached at (571) 270-5442. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /W.Y./Examiner, Art Unit 3667 /Hitesh Patel/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3667 7/13/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jun 11, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703467
MOBILE OBJECT CONTROL SYSTEM, MOBILE OBJECT CONTROL DEVICE, AND MOBILE OBJECT CONTROL METHOD
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12680277
METHOD OF AUTOMATIC DELAY COMPENSATION FOR IMPLEMENT CONTROL WITH WORK MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12643460
BARRIER TRANSFER MACHINE TELEMATIC DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637092
PARKING ASSISTANCE METHOD AND PARKING ASSISTANCE DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631736
MULTI-SENSOR NAVIGATION
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+17.8%)
2y 11m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 146 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month