Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/063,887

WORK LIGHT

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 26, 2025
Examiner
DUNAY, CHRISTOPHER E
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
539 granted / 715 resolved
+7.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 715 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment The applicant’s amendment filed 2/4/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sharrah et al (US 2012/0033415 A1). In regard to claim 1, Sharrah et al disclose a work light comprising: a base (100) including a bottom surface1; a light fixture (200) supported by the base; a magnet (340) adjacent to the bottom surface, the magnet configured to create a magnetic connection between the bottom surface of the base and a work surface to selectively secure the base to the work surface; and a boot (360) coupled to the base and extending over the bottom surface, the boot configured to reduce a strength of the magnetic connection between the base and the work surface. (Figure 15A/15B; see at least [0031] onward) In regard to claim 2, Sharrah et al disclose the boot inhibits the base from being magnetically secured to the work surface. In regard to claim 3, Sharrah et al disclose the base is securable to the work surface via the magnetic connection while the boot is attached to the base. In regard to claim 4, Sharrah et al disclose the magnet is exposed on a surface of the base, and wherein the boot covers the magnet. In regard to claim 5, Sharrah et al disclose the boot is formed of a rubber material. (See [0075]) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sharrah et al (US 2012/0033415 A1). In regard to claim 9 and 10, Sharrah et al fail to disclose a toe and tab portion. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to provide a toe and tab portion to the rubber cover of Sharrah et al in order to simplify removal of the cover. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13, 15-18, and 20 are allowed. Claims 6-8 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The closest prior art, Sharrah et al (US 2012/0033415 A1), does not include the base includes an aperture, and wherein the boot includes a protrusion that is configured to be inserted into the aperture to couple the boot to the base as required by the claim and there is no motivation absent the applicant’s own disclosure, to modify the Sharrah et al reference in the manner required by the claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 2/4/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues that prior art fails to teach the magnetic feature of the bottom of the lamp. The Examiner’s problem is that the bottom is poorly defined. What is the top of the lamp? This isn’t claimed. If the applicant wishes to clearly define all the required geometry, then the Examiner would consider such a claim. However, as it stands, the Examiner can interpret the placement of the magnet as the bottom of the lamp. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E DUNAY whose telephone number is (571)270-1222. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 am - 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James (Jong-Suk) Lee can be reached at 571-272-7044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER E DUNAY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875 1 See Arguments
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602568
BORN-AGAIN TSK FUZZY CLASSIFIER BASED ON KNOWLEDGE DISTILLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601468
Flexible Trim Device for Enhancing LED Strip Lights
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601472
Connection element for an LED light module
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601458
LIGHT FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595895
MULTI-REGION OPTICS FOR FLAT ILLUMINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+14.8%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 715 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month