Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 19/064,139

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ROUTING A SERIAL DIGITAL INTERFACE (SDI) SIGNAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 26, 2025
Priority
Mar 23, 2021 — provisional 63/164,856 +1 more
Examiner
CADORNA, CHRISTOPHER PALACA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Evertz Microsystems Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
158 granted / 238 resolved
+6.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
273
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 238 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 1. Claims 18-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bak et al. (US 20170104974 A1) in view of Ra et al. (US 20120163165 A1). Claim 18 Bak teaches a system for routing an input serial digital interface (SDI) signal, the system comprising: a midplane; (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0116, IP switching/routing apparatus 100) and a controller coupled to the midplane, (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0145, synchronization control module 140) the controller transmitting control signals to control the operation of the midplane; (Bak, ¶0065, providing synchronization signals, i.e. midplane control signals) the midplane comprising an address inserting module (Examiner interprets “an address inserting module” as merely the midplane as configured as described) configured to: receive a packetized media stream having a plurality of packets and an associated source address; (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0052, receiving video signals, i.e. packetized media, associated with sources, sources inherently have addresses) reproduce the packetized media stream to generate one or more separate packetized media streams, each of the one or more separate packetized media streams to be routed to a plurality of destinations; (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0052, convert the video signals into IP packets, ¶0062, each to be transmitted to destinations 300) for each of the separate packetized media streams: determine a destination address for the separate packetized media stream based on control signals transmitted by the controller; (Bak, ¶0086, ¶0086, wherein the synchronization information provides destination 300 information for packets) and the midplane further comprising a routing switch coupled to the address inserting module, the routing switch being configured to: receive the processed packet; (Bak, FIG. 1, IP switching/routing module 120, ¶0081, receiving the preprocessed IP packets) and route the processed packet to an output port based on the destination address and the control signals from the controller. (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0081-¶0083, routing the processed ports to an output port based on the control signals and address) However, Bak does not explicitly teach for each packet in a separate packetized media stream, update the corresponding packet header with the destination address to generate a corresponding processed packet. From a related technology, Ra teaches for each packet in a separate packetized media stream, update the corresponding packet header with the destination address to generate a corresponding processed packet. (FIG. 5, ¶0085, header processor 534 removes the internal header and updates the destination mac address) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed inventions to modify the teachings of Bak to incorporate the teachings of Ra to more effective updates destination addresses and streamline communication efficiency. Claim 19 Bak in view of Ra teaches Claim 18, and further teaches determine addressing rules, the addressing rules corresponding to the plurality of destinations for the packetized media stream; (Bak, ¶0065, providing synchronization signals, i.e. midplane control signals, wherein the synchronization signals are the addressing rules) generate the control signals corresponding to the addressing rules; (Bak, ¶0065, generating the control signals from the synchronization signals) and transmit the control signals to the midplane. (Bak, ¶0065, transmitting control signals) Claim 20 Bak in view of Ra teaches Claim 19, and further teaches wherein the controller is configured to determine the addressing rules based on traffic load information received from the routing switch. (Bak, ¶0065, providing synchronization signals based on traffic information received) Claim 21 Bak in view of Ra teaches Claim 19, and further teaches wherein the controller is configured to determine the addressing rules based on content requirements of downstream devices. (Bak, ¶0065, providing synchronization signals, i.e. midplane control signals based on device requirements) Claim 22 Bak in view of Ra teaches Claim 18, and further teaches identify the source address corresponding to the packetized media stream. (Ra, FIG. 4, ¶0060, acquires source address for the packet stream) Claim 23 Bak in view of Ra teaches Claim 22, and further teaches wherein the address inserting module is configured to append the destination address to the source address of the packet header. (Ra, FIG. 5, ¶0085, header processor 534 removes the internal header and updates the destination mac address) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed inventions to modify the teachings of Bak to incorporate the teachings of Ra to more effective updates destination addresses and streamline communication efficiency. Claim 24 Bak in view of Ra teaches Claim 22, and further teaches wherein the address inserting module is configured to replace the source address of the packet header with the destination address. (Ra, FIG. 5, ¶0085, header processor 534 removes the internal header and updates the destination mac address) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed inventions to modify the teachings of Bak to incorporate the teachings of Ra to more effective updates destination addresses and streamline communication efficiency. Claim 25 Bak in view of Ra teaches Claim 18, and further teaches wherein the midplane is coupled to at least one input card and at least one output card. (Bak, FIG. 3, ¶0067, a midplane coupled to input card 110 and output card 130) Claim 26 Bak in view of Ra teaches Claim 25, and further teaches wherein the at least one input card is configured to: receive the input serial digital interface (SDI) signal at an input SDI port of the at least one input card; (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0052, receive SDI input) process the input SDI signal to generate the packetized media stream; (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0052, convert the video signals into IP packets) and transmit the packetized media stream to the midplane. (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0055, received by the midplane) Claim 27 Bak in view of Ra teaches Claim 25, and further teaches wherein the at least one output card is configured to: receive the processed packet at an input IP port of the at least one output card; (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0063, received packets by the output card) process the processed packet to generate a corresponding output SDI signal; (Bak, ¶0063, convert to SDI signal) and provide the output SDI signal at an output SDI port. (Bak, ¶0063, output SDI signal) Claim 28 Bak teaches a system for routing an input serial digital interface (SDI) signal, the system comprising: a midplane; (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0116, IP switching/routing apparatus 100) and a controller coupled to the midplane, (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0145, synchronization control module 140) the controller transmitting control signals to control the operation of the midplane; (Bak, ¶0065, providing synchronization signals, i.e. midplane control signals) the midplane comprising an address inserting module (Examiner interprets “an address inserting module” as merely the midplane as configured as described) configured to: receive a packetized media stream having a plurality of packets and an associated source address; (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0052, receiving video signals, i.e. packetized media, associated with sources, sources inherently have addresses) determine a destination address for the separate packetized media stream based on control signals transmitted by the controller; (Bak, ¶0086, ¶0086, wherein the synchronization information provides destination 300 information for packets) and the midplane further comprising a routing switch coupled to the address inserting module, the routing switch being configured to: receive the processed packet; (Bak, FIG. 1, IP switching/routing module 120, ¶0081, receiving the preprocessed IP packets) and route the processed packet to an output port based on the destination address and the control signals from the controller. (Bak, FIG. 1, ¶0081-¶0083, routing the processed ports to an output port based on the control signals and address) However, Bak does not explicitly teach for each packet in a separate packetized media stream, update the corresponding packet header with the destination address to generate a corresponding processed packet. From a related technology, Ra teaches for each packet in a separate packetized media stream, update the corresponding packet header with the destination address to generate a corresponding processed packet. (FIG. 5, ¶0085, header processor 534 removes the internal header and updates the destination mac address) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed inventions to modify the teachings of Bak to incorporate the teachings of Ra to more effective updates destination addresses and streamline communication efficiency. Claim 29-31 are taught by Bak in view of Ra as described for Claims 19-21. Claim 32-36 are taught by Bak in view of Ra as described for Claims 23-27. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER PALACA CADORNA whose telephone number is (571)270-0584. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:00-7:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Follansbee can be reached at (571) 272-3964. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P CADORNA/Examiner, Art Unit 2444 /JOHN A FOLLANSBEE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2444
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739293
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SMART TRANSCRIPTION PROXY SERVICE FOR LIMITING AUDIO PROCESSING
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726534
MOVING IMAGE RECEPTION DEVICE, MOVING IMAGE TRANSMISSION DEVICE, MOVING IMAGE TRANSMISSION/RECEPTION SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726327
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HANDLING NON-SYNCHRONOUS INTERRUPTS IN A TIME SYNCHRONOUS NETWORK
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719937
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A SCALABLE NETWORK ARCHITECTURE FOR DIVERSE NETWORK ELEMENT MANAGEMENT
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12706846
Network Device, System and Method For Cycle-Based Load Balancing
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+19.1%)
3y 3m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 238 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month