Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/064,339

VEHICLE HAVING ADJUSTABLE COMPRESSION AND REBOUND DAMPING

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 26, 2025
Examiner
TO, TOAN C
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Polaris Industries Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
903 granted / 986 resolved
+39.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
998
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§102
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 986 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1-7, recitation “determine, based on the one or more of acceleration information, pitch information, or position information, to adjust damping of at least one of the plurality of adjustable shock absorbers” in claim 1 renders the claim indefinite for being unclear because it is not known the controller is configured to determine what parameter of the vehicle in order to adjust damping of the shock absorber. Regarding claims 8-14, recitation “determining, based on the acceleration information and pitch information, to adjust damping of at least one of the one or more adjustable shock absorbers” in claim 8 renders the claim indefinite for being unclear because it is not known the step of determining what parameter of the vehicle in order to adjust damping of the shock absorber. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, as best understood by the examiner, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Oshita (U.S. 2014/0232082). Oshita discloses a recreational vehicle, comprising: a plurality of ground engaging members; a frame (vehicle chassis) supported by the plurality of ground engaging members (2); a plurality of suspensions (see fig. 1), wherein each of the plurality of suspensions couples a ground engaging member (2), from the plurality of ground engaging members, to the frame, wherein the plurality of suspensions includes a plurality of adjustable shock absorbers (10); at least one sensor (30) positioned on the recreational vehicle and configured to provide acceleration information to a controller (see paragraph 0091); and the controller operatively coupled to the at least one sensor (30) and the plurality of adjustable shock absorbers (10), wherein the controller is configured to: receive, from the at least one sensor (30), the acceleration information; determine vehicle parameter, based on the one or more of acceleration information, to adjust damping (see fig. 7) of at least one of the plurality of adjustable shock absorbers (10); and provide, to the at least one of the plurality of adjustable shock absorbers (10), one or more commands (see paragraph 0095 and fig. 7) to result in an adjustment of a damping characteristic of the at least one of the plurality of adjustable shock absorbers (10); a stabilizer bar (352) coupled between a rear suspension of the plurality of suspensions and the frame. Claims 8-10, as best understood by the examiner, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Oakden-Graus (U.S. 2018/0354336). Oakden-Graus discloses a method of adjusting one or more adjustable shock absorbers (110) of a vehicle, the method comprising: receiving, from at least one sensor (152, 158) of the vehicle, acceleration information; determining, based on the acceleration information and pitch information, to adjust damping of at least one of the one or more adjustable shock absorbers (110); and providing, to the at least one of the one or more adjustable shock absorbers (110), one or more commands to cause an adjustment of a damping characteristic of the at least one of the one or more adjustable shock absorbers (110), wherein the at least one sensor (152) comprises at least one of: an accelerometer; wherein the damping characteristic comprises at least one of: a compression damping or a rebound damping (see paragraph 0053). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oshita (U.S. 2014/0232082) in view of Bedard (U.S. 2013/0285339). Oshita discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that the recreational vehicle is a snowmobile, and wherein the plurality of ground engaging members include skis. Bedard teaches the vehicle is a snowmobile, and wherein the plurality of ground engaging members include skis (12, 30). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to modify the vehicle of Oshita by using teaching of Bedard in order to improve riding safety and comfort for an operator. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-7 and 11-14 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 15-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claims 4-5, the closest prior art as to Oshita (U.S. 2014/0232082) and Oakden-Graus (U.S. 2018/0354336) discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that the controller is further configured to: determine, based on the one or more of acceleration information, pitch information, and position information, that a rear loading event is occurring, wherein the one or more commands comprise a command to increase a compression damping characteristic of the at least one of the plurality of adjustable shock absorbers. Regarding claims 6-7, the closest prior art as to Oshita (U.S. 2014/0232082) and Oakden-Graus (U.S. 2018/0354336) discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that the controller is further configured to: determine, based on the one or more of acceleration information, pitch information, and position information that a rear unloading event is occurring, wherein the one or more commands comprise a command to increase a rebound damping characteristic of the at least one of the plurality of adjustable shock absorbers. Regarding claims 11-12, the closest prior art as to Oshita (U.S. 2014/0232082) and Oakden-Graus (U.S. 2018/0354336) discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that determining, based on the acceleration information and pitch information, that a rear loading event is occurring, by: calculating a rear loading event score based on the acceleration information and pitch information; and comparing the rear loading event score to one or more thresholds, wherein the one or more commands comprise a command to increase a compression damping characteristic of the at least one of the one or more adjustable shock absorbers. Regarding claims 13-14, the closest prior art as to Oshita (U.S. 2014/0232082) and Oakden-Graus (U.S. 2018/0354336) discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that determining, based on the acceleration information and pitch information, that a rear unloading event is occurring, wherein the one or more commands comprise a command to increase a rebound damping characteristic of the at least one of the one or more adjustable shock absorbers. Regarding claims 15-20, the closest prior art as to Oshita (U.S. 2014/0232082) and Oakden-Graus (U.S. 2018/0354336) discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that the controller operatively coupled to the at least one sensor and the plurality of adjustable shock absorbers, wherein the controller is configured to: receive, from the at least one sensor, the acceleration information and the pitch information; calculate an event score based on the acceleration information and the pitch information; compare the calculated event score to a threshold; and control at least one adjustable shock absorber of the plurality of adjustable shock absorbers to adjust a damping characteristic of the at least one adjustable shock absorber based on the comparison. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOAN C TO whose telephone number is (571)272-6677. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JASON D SHANSKE can be reached at (571)270-5985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOAN C TO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3614 March 31, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600189
CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VEHICLE SUSPENSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589624
PITCH AND ROLL CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589625
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583279
CONTROL VALVE DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING DAMPING CHARACTERISTICS, AND HYDRAULIC FLOW-THROUGH SOLENOID VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583277
DAMPER CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (-3.8%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 986 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month