Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/065,177

GILBERT MIXER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Priority
Apr 26, 2024 — EU 24172817.9
Examiner
ALGAHAIM, HELAL A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
NXP Semiconductors N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
261 granted / 341 resolved
+16.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
346
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 341 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 16, 17, 24 and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §112(b) as indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 31 recite “first and second multi-finger field effect transistor, FET, devices.” However, claim 1 further recites that alternating adjacent pairs of gate fingers of each FET device are connected to respective upper and lower voltage rails, which are connected to different input terminals. Thus, each claimed FET device appears to include gate fingers driven by different gate potentials. It is unclear whether each recited “FET device” is intended to be a single multi-finger FET, multiple FETs merged into one physical structure, or a pair of FET devices corresponding to different Gilbert mixer transistors. Because the claim does not clearly define the structure encompassed by the term “FET device,” the metes and bounds of claim 1 are unclear. The added limitation that “the second FET device is offset in a direction orthogonal to the longitudinal axis relative to the first FET device” clarifies the relative physical placement of the first and second structures but does not cure the ambiguity regarding whether each claimed “FET device” is a single FET or multiple FETs having gate fingers connected to different gate potentials. Claim 24 is also indefinite because the recitation that the first and second gate interconnects are “symmetrical” is ambiguous. It is unclear whether the claim requires each of the first and second gate interconnects to be individually symmetrical, or whether the claim requires the first and second gate interconnects to be symmetrical with respect to each other. The claim also does not clearly identify the axis, plane, or reference feature about which the alleged symmetry is measured. Accordingly, the scope of the symmetry limitation is unclear. The dependent claims are also rejected under 35 U.S.C. §112(b) because they depend on and incorporate the indefinite limitations of claim 1 and/or claim 9, and do not cure the deficiencies identified above. Therefore, claims 16, 17, 24 and 31, and any claims depending therefrom, are indefinite under 35 U.S.C. §112(b). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HELAL A ALGAHAIM whose telephone number is (571)270-5227. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Thomas. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HELAL A ALGAHAIM/SPE , Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743907
DETECTING AND COLLECTING ACCIDENT RELATED DRIVING EXPERIENCE EVENT DATA
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741675
PARKING ASSISTANCE APPARATUS AND PARKING ASSISTANCE METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736339
ROAD SURFACE ABNORMALITY DETECTION APPARATUS, ROAD SURFACE ABNORMALITY DETECTION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12654844
VEHICLE BASED OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREFOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644723
Generating a Customized Digital Map Via a Generative Machine-Learned Model
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+15.0%)
3y 4m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 341 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month