Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/065,648

ARRANGEMENT OF A TIPPING-OVER-PREVENTION OF A CHEST OF DRAWERS, AND A CHEST OF DRAWERS USING SUCH ARRANGEMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Priority
Feb 28, 2024 — SE 2450237-9
Examiner
ROHRHOFF, DANIEL J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Inter IKEA Systems B.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1057 granted / 1356 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1377
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.4%
+21.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1356 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 & 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Chen et al. (US patent application publication 2024/0245213) (hereinafter Chen). Regarding claim 1, Chen discloses an arrangement for tipping-over-prevention of a chest of drawers that includes a partition wall (38) separating two columns of drawers (24a, 24b), the arrangement comprising: a first drawer locking arrangement having a first guiding rail (76) configured to be movably mounted to a first side of the partition wall; a second drawer locking arrangement having a second guiding rail (74) configured to be movably mounted to a second side of the partition wall, opposite the first side; a plurality of locking members (80, 90); wherein each of the first and the second guiding rails supports at least two of the locking members, each locking member being configured to selectively engage an associated drawer, and selectively allow only one drawer in a column to be opened at a time; and a connector arrangement (64) configured to interconnect the first and the second guiding rails via a through-going opening (H1) in the partition wall, such that the first and the second guiding rails are configured to be moved as one common unit relative to the partition wall ([0039-0044]). Regarding claim 19, Chen discloses a chest of drawers comprising a partition wall separating two columns of drawers, and an arrangement for tipping-over-prevention according to claim 1 (Fig. 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-18 are allowed. Claims 2-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure because it gives a general state of the art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL J ROHRHOFF whose telephone number is (571)270-7624. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dan Troy can be reached at 571-270-3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL J ROHRHOFF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677943
BATHROOM WARDROBE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677944
CABINET DRAWER MECHANISM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677938
Band Brake Mechanism
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680751
REFRIGERATOR
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674617
REFRIGERATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+14.4%)
1y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1356 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month