Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/066,104

SHEET FEEDING DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Examiner
GONZALEZ, LUIS A
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
885 granted / 1044 resolved
+32.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1078
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.1%
+0.1% vs TC avg
§102
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1044 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aoki et al. JP 2021-067780 A (hereinafter “Aoki”) in view of Aoki US 2020/0033800 A1 (hereinafter “Aoki ‘800”). Regarding claims 1 and 9 (image forming apparatus-FIG.1), Aoki, with reference to FIG. 5, teaches a sheet feeding device, comprising: a sheet housing unit (506) that is mounted on a body of an apparatus (250) such that the sheet housing unit can be pulled out of the body of the apparatus; a blowing unit (611a, 611b) that blows air toward a sheet housed in the sheet housing unit; a heating unit (613) that heats the air blown by the blowing unit; and a control unit (301) that controls the blowing unit and the heating unit, the control unit being configured to drive the blowing unit and the heating unit, and continuously drive the blowing unit (”sheet loosening fans 611a and 611b operate for a predetermined time (for example, 15 seconds) as initial loosening when the power of the image forming device is turned on, when the feeding deck 250 is opened and closed”) and stop the heating unit when the sheet housing unit is pulled out of the body of the apparatus during the sheet feeding operation (“When the storage open / close detection sensor 608 detects that the storage 506 has been opened in step S7, the heater for heating the handling air is stopped”). Aoki is silent in teaching wherein the blowing unit and the heating unit are driven during a sheet feeding operation of feeding the sheet from the sheet housing unit, however, Aoki ‘800 teaches it’s well-known in the art to use side blowers (611a, 611b) also during sheet feeding operation ([0108]) for loosening of sheet during sheet feeding in addition to a pre-loosening operation to facilitate separation of sheets during sheet feeding. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Aoki’s device using blowing unit and heating unit to operate during a sheet feeding operation as taught by Aoki ‘800 for providing air and heat assistance for separating sheets during the sheet feeding operation. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUIS A GONZALEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-3094. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at 571-272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUIS A GONZALEZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600592
MEDIUM EJECTION APPARATUS INCLUDING EJECTION TRAY FORMED WITH RECESSED PART AND BEAM PART
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600587
MEDIUM FEED APPARATUS TO ADVANCE SUCCEEDING SHEET OF MEDIUM WHEN PRECEDING SHEET OF MEDIUM PASSES PICK ROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583143
SHEET PROCESSING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577002
GRASPING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INSERTING SEPARATION SHEETS IN A RECEPTACLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577077
SHEET REMOVER, CONVEYING DEVICE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.3%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1044 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month