Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/066,331

SLATE CONNECTOR AND POOL TABLE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 28, 2025
Priority
Sep 02, 2022 — CN 202211069268.1 +1 more
Examiner
PAIK, STEVEN SANGYUL
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
None recorded (individual inventor: Yuanxu QIAO)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
21%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 21% of cases
21%
Career Allowance Rate
9 granted / 43 resolved
-47.1% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
2 currently pending
Career history
49
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
58.9%
+18.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 43 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: The reference number for cushion “7” described in paragraphs [0013] and [0019] is not shown in Figures 1-4. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The word, “poor” in paragraph [0019] on page 3 of the Specification should be - - pool - -. The reference number of “via hole 11” in paragraph [0074] should be - - via hole 21 - -. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claims 6-8 are objected to because of the following informalities: “…oblong nut a width direction…” in line 2 of claim 6 appears to be - - oblong nut in a width direction… - -. Dependent claims 7 and 8 are objected due to their dependency from an objected claim 6. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The word, “fittedly” in line 9 of claim 1 does not appear to be properly reciting the claimed invention. The examiner respectfully suggests using a different word to describe how the oblong nut is embedded in the arc-shaped groove, and “an interference-fit manner” in 14 of claim 9 appears to be indefinite. It is unclear what is considered as an interference-fit manner from the Specification. Further clarification would make the claims more accurate and definite. Dependent claim 2-10 are rejected due to its dependency from claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Li (CN 113663315) Frasca (US 5161797) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN S PAIK whose telephone number is (571)272-2404. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thur: 6AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allana L Bidder can be reached at 571-272-5560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEVEN S. PAIK Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 2876 /STEVEN S PAIK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744132
TRANSFER SYSTEM FOR A SEALED ENCLOSURE HAVING A SEALED CONNECTION DEVICE FOR CONNECTING TO AN ENCLOSED VOLUME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730999
SYSTEM FOR ADAPTIVE DECODER MANAGEMENT IN SECURE DATA PROCESSING
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12704606
SCANNING MODULE, DISTANCE MEASURING DEVICE, AND MOVABLE PLATFORM
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12705446
System and Method for Multi-Level Security in High-Capacity Optical Codes
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12682196
System and Method for Dynamic Multi-Level Security in High-Capacity Optical Codes
1y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
21%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (+25.0%)
3y 4m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 43 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month