Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/066,383

SECURITY ENCLOSURE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 28, 2025
Priority
Nov 27, 2019 — provisional 62/941,298 +4 more
Examiner
GEHMAN, BRYON P
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
AOB Products Company
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
1468 granted / 1990 resolved
+3.8% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
2029
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1990 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 15-18 and 20 are finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hoofe IV (11,908,307). Claims are finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hoofe IV (2019/0378399). Each discloses a security monitor (300) for an enclosure (301), a portable housing (objects 311-316B) mountable in the enclosure, the security monitor comprising a plurality of data sensors (321-326B) for monitoring data associated with the enclosure, the plurality of data sensors being supported by the housing, the plurality of data sensors comprising motion, temperature and humidity (see column 11, line 60 through column 12, line 3), a wireless communication port (see column 5, lines 40-53 and column 6, lines 15-41) configured to connect to a wireless network and supported by the housing, a security monitor controller (401) supported by the housing, and a security monitor tangible storage medium (65) supported by the housing. As to claims 16 and 17, an accelerometer (see column 5, lines 3-13) as a motion sensor is inherently configured to sense vibrations. As to claim 18, a magnet for magnetic mounting (see column 20, lines 27-47) is disclosed. As to claim 20, the security monitor tangible storage medium (65) processes and transmits data as part of the security monitor. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hoofe IV in view of DiPoala (2016/0323118). Hoofe IV does not disclose a hook-and-loop mounting fabric. However, DiPoala discloses it was known to employ a hook-and-loop mounting structure to support a sensor (see paragraph 63). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the security monitor of Hoofe IV with hook-and-loop mounting structure in the manner of DiPoala as claimed, as such a modification would predictably provide an adjustable mounting means for the monitor housing. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 15-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Hoofe IV primarily shows the subject matter as now claimed. Claims 1-14 are allowed. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Prior Art not relied upon: Please refer to the additional references listed on the attached PTO-892, which, while not relied upon for the claim rejection, these references are deemed relevant to the claimed invention as a whole. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRYON P GEHMAN whose telephone number is (571) 272-4555. The examiner can normally be reached on Tuesday through Thursday from 7:30 am to 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Orlando Aviles-Bosques, can be reached on (571) 270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRYON P GEHMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736 Bryon P. Gehman Primary Examiner Art Unit 3736 BPG
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 07, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747079
ARTICLE CARRIER AND BLANK THEREFOR
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751243
MODULE TRAY FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741364
TOOL SUPPLY DEVICE
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735246
ARRAYS OF SANITARY TISSUE PRODUCTS COMPRISING NON-WOOD(S)
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735229
PACKAGING FOR A PRODUCT, IN PARTICULAR FOR A FOOD PRODUCT
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.6%)
1y 11m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1990 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month