Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/066,856

Article Transport Facility

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 28, 2025
Priority
Mar 07, 2024 — JP 2024-035164
Examiner
LANG, MICHAEL DEAN
Art Unit
3667
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Daifuku Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
664 granted / 763 resolved
+35.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
3 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§102
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 763 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Oda et al. (WO2024157341). Regarding claim 1: Oda discloses an article transport facility (Paragraph 0012), comprising: at least one transport vehicle configured to move along a travelable path to transport an article; and a control system configured to control the at least one transport vehicle (Paragraph 0033-0038), and wherein: the at least one transport vehicle comprises a power storage and a drive drivable by electric power stored in the power storage, the control system is configured to perform (Paragraph 0018): a power amount obtaining process of obtaining information indicating a battery level of the power storage ,a pathfinding process of finding a candidate path that is a candidate for a travel path of the at least one transport vehicle and setting the found candidate path as the travel path, a usable power determination process of determining, based on the battery level obtained in the power amount obtaining process, a usable power amount that is an upper limit of electric power usable by the at least one transport vehicle (Paragraph 0033-0038), and an estimated power consumption deriving process of deriving estimated power consumption that is an estimated power amount to be used by the at least one transport vehicle for a target operation (Paragraph 0033-0038), and the control system is configured to determine, in the pathfinding process for setting a first travel path that is the travel path from a specified travel origin to a specified travel destination, whether first estimated power consumption that is the estimated power consumption derived using, as the target operation, an operation for moving along the candidate path for the first travel path exceeds the usable power amount, and exclude, from candidates for the first travel path, a path for which the first estimated power consumption is determined to exceed the usable power amount during search for the candidate path to continue to search for the candidate path at least partially different from the excluded path (Paragraph 0033-0038). Regarding claim 2: Oda discloses in response to a transport command to transport the article from a transport origin to a transport destination, the control system performs the pathfinding process for setting the first travel path including the transport origin as a travel origin and the transport destination as a travel destination (Paragraph 0033-0038). Regarding claim 3: Oda discloses the control system performs, for the at least one transport vehicle moving along the first travel path set in the pathfinding process, the pathfinding process for resetting a first partial path that is the travel path from a current location of the at least one transport vehicle to the transport destination, and the control system determines, in the pathfinding process for resetting the first partial path, whether first partial estimated power consumption that is the estimated power consumption derived using, as the target operation, an operation for moving along the candidate path for the first partial path exceeds the usable power amount, excludes, from candidates for the first partial path, a path for which the first partial estimated power consumption is determined to exceed the usable power amount during search for the candidate path to continue to search for the candidate path at least partially different from the excluded path, and changes, in response to no candidate path with the first partial estimated power consumption less than or equal to the usable power amount being found, a destination of the at least one transport vehicle from the transport destination to an article storage device disposed within an area reachable with electric power less than or equal to the usable power amount (Paragraph 0033-0038). Regarding claim 4: Oda discloses wherein: the at least one transport vehicle comprises a plurality of transport vehicles configured to move along the travelable path, and the control system determines, in the pathfinding process for setting a second travel path that is the travel path from a current location of a target transport vehicle among the plurality of transport vehicles to the specified travel destination, whether second estimated power consumption that is the estimated power consumption derived using, as the target operation, an operation for moving along the candidate path for the second travel path exceeds the usable power amount of a candidate transport vehicle that is a candidate for the target transport vehicle, and excludes, from candidates for the target transport vehicle, a candidate transport vehicle for which the second estimated power consumption is determined to exceed the usable power amount during search for the candidate path to continue to search for the candidate path (Paragraph 0037-0040). Regarding claim 5: Oda discloses wherein: the at least one transport vehicle comprises a plurality of transport vehicles configured to move along the travelable path, in response to a transport command to transport the article from a transport origin to a transport destination, the control system performs the pathfinding process for setting the first travel path including the transport origin as a travel origin and the transport destination as a travel destination and the pathfinding process for setting a second travel path that is the travel path from a current location of a target transport vehicle among the plurality of transport vehicles to the transport origin, the control system performs, in the pathfinding process for setting the second travel path, search for the candidate path starting from the transport origin in an upstream direction opposite to a travel direction of the target transport vehicle, determines whether second estimated power consumption that is the estimated power consumption derived using, as the target operation, an operation for moving along the candidate path for the second travel path exceeds a target usable power amount of a candidate transport vehicle that is a candidate for the target transport vehicle, excludes, from candidates for the target transport vehicle, a candidate transport vehicle for which the second estimated power consumption is determined to exceed the target usable power amount during search for the candidate path to continue to search for the candidate path, selects, in response to the candidate path reaching the candidate transport vehicle with the second estimated power consumption less than or equal to the target usable power amount, the candidate transport vehicle as the target transport vehicle, and sets, as the second travel path, a path from a current location of the candidate transport vehicle to the transport origin along the candidate path reaching the candidate transport vehicle, and the target usable power amount is a value obtained by subtracting, from the usable power amount, a sum of the first estimated power consumption, the estimated power consumption derived using, as the target operation, an operation for receiving the article at the transport origin, and the estimated power consumption derived using, as the target operation, an operation for transferring the article at the transport destination (Paragraph 0033-0040). Regarding claim 6: Oda discloses wherein: the control system determines the usable power amount of each of the plurality of transport vehicles in the usable power determination process, and the control system excludes, in the pathfinding process for setting the second travel path, a transport vehicle with the target usable power amount less than or equal to zero from candidates for the target transport vehicle in searching for the candidate path (Paragraph 0033-0040). Regarding claim 7: Oda discloses wherein: the control system performs, for a transport vehicle moving along the second travel path set in the pathfinding process, the pathfinding process for resetting a second partial path that is the travel path from a current location of the transport vehicle to the transport origin, and the control system determines, in the pathfinding process for resetting the second partial path, whether second partial estimated power consumption that is the estimated power consumption derived using, as the target operation, an operation for moving along the candidate path for the second partial path exceeds the target usable power amount, excludes, from candidates for the second partial path, a path for which the second partial estimated power consumption is determined to exceed the target usable power amount during search for the candidate path to continue to search for the candidate path at least partially different from the excluded path, and performs, in response to no candidate path with the second partial estimated power consumption less than or equal to the target usable power amount being found, the pathfinding process for setting the second travel path to direct another transport vehicle among the plurality of transport vehicles to the transport origin (Paragraph 0033-0040). Regarding claim 8: Oda discloses wherein: the travelable path comprises a charging area configured to feed electric power to the at least one transport vehicle, and in the estimated power consumption deriving process, the control system derives, in response to the candidate path including the charging area, the estimated power consumption using zero or a negative value as a power amount to be used by the at least one transport vehicle in the charging area (Paragraph 0030). Regarding claim 9: Oda discloses wherein: in the pathfinding process, the control system performs a low-cost path finding process of preferentially finding, as the candidate path, a low-cost path from a plurality of paths using a cost that is a value derived from a factor affecting a travel time of the at least one transport vehicle and is higher for a longer travel time of the at least one transport vehicle (Paragraph 0033-0038). Regarding claim 10: Oda discloses wherein: the control system finds, in the pathfinding process, the candidate path by sequentially connecting point-to-point paths to each other, the point-to-point paths each connecting points, the control system derives, in the low-cost path finding process, the cost for the candidate path based on a sum of respective costs for the point-to-point paths included in the candidate path, and the control system derives, in the estimated power consumption deriving process, the estimated power consumption for the candidate path based on a sum of respective values of the estimated power consumption for the point-to-point paths included in the candidate path (Paragraph 0033-0040). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael D Lang whose telephone number is (571)270-3213. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am-11am and 2pm-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hitesh Patel can be reached at 571-270-5442. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL D LANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3667
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12675117
Automated Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Dock Verification And Landing
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675118
UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675114
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR SUBTERRANEAN MARKER GUIDANCE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663799
DIGITAL CO-PILOT
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12632069
AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR AUTOMATED GUIDED SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+5.6%)
2y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 763 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month