Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/067,163

MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 28, 2025
Priority
Dec 31, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0189101 +1 more
Examiner
RAMASWAMY, ARUN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
686 granted / 810 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
842
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
60.0%
+20.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 810 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the coating layer" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the coating layer" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the coating layer" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the coating layer" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 12 recites the limitation "the coating layer" in line 2 and “the adhesion assisting layer” in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mori et al. (US Publication 2015/0084481). In re claim 7, Mori discloses a multilayer ceramic electronic component comprising: a ceramic body (110 – Figure 2, ¶48, ¶43) including dielectric layers (140 – Figure 2, ¶46) and first internal electrodes and second internal electrodes (130 – Figure 2, ¶46) disposed to face each other and alternately stacked with the respective dielectric layers interposed therebetween (Figure 2); a first external electrode (left 121 – Figure 2, ¶57) connected to the first internal electrodes (130 extending to left surface of 110 – Figure 2); a second external electrode (right 121 – Figure 2) connected to the second internal electrodes (130 extending to right surface of 110); and a cover layer (any arbitrary portion of 122 – Figure 2, ¶57) disposed on the ceramic body (110 – Figure 2), the first external electrode (left 121 – Figure 2), and the second external electrode (right 121 – Figure 2), wherein the cover layer (122 – Figure 2) includes a first layer and a second layer (Figure 2; ¶98, Note that the cover layer can be any portion of element 122. Further, this cover layer can be arbitrarily divided into two layers.), an average thickness of the cover layer is 400 nm or more and 600 nm or less (Figure 2, ¶98; Note that the thickness of the insulation layer is from 15 to 30 micrometers. The Examiner is taking the cover layer to be a portion of the insulation layer that meets this thickness limitation. ) and a ratio of an average thickness of the second layer to the average thickness of the cover layer is 0.05 or more to 0.95 or less (Figure 2, ¶98; The first and second layers can be arbitrary portions of the cover layer that meet this thickness ratio limitation.). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-6 are allowed. The prior art does not teach nor suggest (in combination with other claim limitations) the protective layer includes an adhesion assisting layer and a coating layer, an average thickness of the protective layer is from 400 nm to 600 nm, and a ratio of an average thickness of the coating layer to the average thickness of the protective layer is 0.05 to 0.95. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ahn et al. (US Publication 2015/0124370) Figure 6 Jinno et al. (US Patent 6,171,644) Figure 3 Motoki et al. (US Publication 2010/0290172) Figure 1 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARUN RAMASWAMY whose telephone number is (571)270-1962. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached at 571-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ARUN RAMASWAMY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744163
CAPACITOR AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738425
LAMINATE CAPACITOR AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738419
MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITOR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738423
MULTI-LAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12725739
MULTILAYERED CAPACITOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 6m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 810 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month