Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/067,355

ELECTRODIALYSIS PROCESS AND BIPOLAR MEMBRANE ELECTRODIALYSIS DEVICES FOR SILICA REMOVAL

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 28, 2025
Priority
Jun 25, 2019 — provisional 62/866,407 +2 more
Examiner
HASKE, WOJCIECH
Art Unit
1794
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Texopco LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
427 granted / 585 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
625
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 585 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims Status Claims 1-7 are pending. Claim 1 has been amended. Applicant’s arguments, filed 03/30/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-7 under 35 USC 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Liu et al. (US 20180312415 A1). The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claim(s) 1-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liu et al. (US 20180312415 A1). Considering claim 1, Liu discloses a bipolar membrane electrodialysis device comprising: one or more anion exchange membranes (6) [0062]; one or more bipolar membranes (1, 2) ([0058], [00059]); and a pair of electrodes comprising a positive electrode (4) [0060] and a negative electrode (5) [0061]; and an electrolyte stream (A) passing through a channel between at least one electrode of the pair of electrodes and an adjacent membrane (Fig. 2). PNG media_image1.png 336 566 media_image1.png Greyscale Considering claim 2, Liu discloses each bipolar membrane of the one or more bipolar membranes comprises an anionic material (1) [0057] and a cationic material (2) [0058]. Considering claim 3, Liu discloses the one or more anion exchange membrane (6) and the one or more bipolar membranes (1, 2) form an alternating stack sandwiched between the positive electrode (4) and the negative electrode (5) of the pair of electrodes (Fig. 2). Considering claim 4, Liu discloses the bipolar membrane electrodialysis device is configured to remove silica from a desalinated water stream [0093]. Considering claim 5, Liu discloses an acid chamber and an alkaline/base chamber (Fig. 2 and [0066], [0067]). Considering claim 6, Liu discloses a product inlet stream (B) of the bipolar membrane electrodialysis device flows through the alkaline/base chamber [0067]. Considering claim 7, Liu discloses a brine inlet stream (B) of the bipolar membrane electrodialysis device flows through the acid chamber ([0066] and Fig. 2). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-7 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Wojciech Haske whose telephone number is (571)272-5666. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30 am - 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Lin can be reached at 571-272-8902. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WOJCIECH HASKE/ Examiner, Art Unit 1794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692614
Method and Apparatus for Plating Metal and Metal Oxide Layer Cores
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692609
NANOMATERIAL WITH NOBLE METAL ATOMS ON NON-NOBLE METAL SUBSTRATE, AND METHODS OF PREPARATION AND USE THEREOF
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680180
CO2 AND CO ELECTROLYSIS TO PRODUCE HIGH PURITY ISOTOPICALLY LABELLED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12655535
COMPOSITE CARBON NANOTUBE STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644193
ENERGY UTILIZATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CARBON-CONTAINING MATERIAL
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+17.8%)
2y 5m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 585 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month