Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/067,366

Predictive Search and Navigation for Functional Information Systems

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Feb 28, 2025
Examiner
CASANOVA, JORGE A
Art Unit
2165
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Locus LP
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
664 granted / 783 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
797
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 783 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office action Non-Final. Prior Art Made of Record The prior arts made of record and not relied upon on the 892 are considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure, however, not obvious over the already allowed claims. Statutory Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-25 of prior U.S. Patent No. 11,657,026. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusions/Points of Contacts Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JORGE A CASANOVA whose telephone number is (571)270-3563. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F: 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aleksandr Kerzhner can be reached on (571) 270-1760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JORGE A CASANOVA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2165
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596748
GRAPH DATABASE STORAGE ENGINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591620
TEMPORAL GRAPH ANALYTICS ON PERSISTENT MEMORY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12566798
CAUSAL ANALYSIS WITH TIME SERIES DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12554734
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12554739
CONFIGURATION-DRIVEN EFFICIENT TRANSFORMATION OF FORMATS AND OBJECT STRUCTURES FOR DATA SPECIFICATIONS IN COMPUTING SERVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 783 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month