Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/068,690

TONER CONTAINER HAVING POSITIONING FEATURES FOR ELECTRICAL CONTACTS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Mar 03, 2025
Examiner
GRAINGER, QUANA MASHELLE
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lexmark International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
1016 granted / 1146 resolved
+20.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1174
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
43.3%
+3.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1146 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings filed on 3/3/2025 are acceptable for examination by the examiner. Claim Objection Claims 1-13 are objected to because of the following informalities. Claim 1 recites a “second guide” which is discussed paragraph [0071]. However, it does not discuss the structure with respect to a second guide but with respect to a “side guide”. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 1 is provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of copending Application No. 18/129,517 (no patent number listed, claims allowed). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the instant invention claims “…the alignment guide includes a second guide having an inner side contact surface that is unobstructed to contact the electrical connector of the image forming device during insertion of the toner container into the image forming device …“. The application 18/129,517 recites “… the alignment guide includes a side guide having an inner side contact surface for contacting the electrical connector of the image forming device during insertion of the toner container into the image forming device …” in claim 1. The instant claim 1 is not identical but the differs in that the second guide is unobstructed to contact the electrical connector. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the effective filing date of this application to form the guide so that it could contact the electrical connector as is its purpose. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Johnson, Jr. et al. (US 2020/0218174 A1) teaches a toner cartridge with alignment guide. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUANA GRAINGER whose telephone number is (571)272-2135. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday, 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Lindsay can be reached on 571-272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUANA GRAINGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852 QG
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 03, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601997
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS THAT DETECTS STOPPING POSITION OF ROTOR OF MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595145
SHEET PROPERTY MEASUREMENT DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS INCLUDING SHEET PROPERTY MEASUREMENT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591193
FIXING DEVICE INCLUDING FIRST AND SECOND HEATING MEMBERS DISPOSED AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS ALONG A TRAVELING DIRECTION OF A RECORDING MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591190
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS CONFIGURED TO APPLY A TRANSFER BIAS TO A TRANSFER NIP BASED ON A PLURALITY OF TRANSFER CONDITIONS, IMAGE FORMING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591191
SLIDING MEMBERWITH SPACED GROOVES, FIXING DEVICE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (-3.9%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1146 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month