Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/069,473

CONTROL DEVICE FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 04, 2025
Priority
Mar 28, 2024 — JP 2024-053761
Examiner
MOUBRY, JAMES G
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
683 granted / 860 resolved
+9.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
869
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 860 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is the initial office action based on the 19/069,473 application filed March 4, 2025. Claims 1-9 are pending and have been fully considered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) dated March 4, 2025 is noted. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98. Accordingly, the IDS is being considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vincenzi et al. (U.S. Patent No. 8,775,054, herein “Vincenzi”). Regarding Claim 1, Vincenzi discloses a control device for an internal combustion engine, which is a control device for a spark ignition internal combustion engine (“spark ignition direct injection (SIDI) engine”), configured to directly inject fuel into a cylinder (see column 2, lines 21-28 and column 5, lines 51-55 providing that the engine may utilize “alcohol based fuels”). Vincenzi discloses that the control device (engine control module (ECM) (130)) includes a controller configured to control an injection timing when the fuel is injected into the cylinder from a fuel injection device and an ignition timing when the fuel in the cylinder is ignited by a spark (see column 3, lines 45-57), and an ambient temperature detecting part (engine coolant temperature sensor (154)) configured to detect an ambient temperature (see column 4, lines 22-29), wherein the controller executes spark ignition of the fuel in a fuel injection period in which the fuel is injected into the cylinder when the ambient temperature is equal to or smaller than a predetermined value (see column 7, line 12 - column 8, line 55, “cold start mode” activated with coolant temperature is below a threshold temperature, specifically, see column 7 lines 19-25). Interpretation note: based upon the instant disclosure, “ambient temperature” is the temperature of the outside air and/or the temperature of the engine water (see presently pending application, page 4, line 3-5). Therefore, the claim limitation of an ambient temperature reads upon the teachings of Vincenzi. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vincenzi in view of Yi et al. (U.S. Patent No. 7,992,537, herein “Yi”). Regarding Claim 2, Vincenzi discloses the invention substantially as claimed, including wherein the system includes an engine water temperature detecting part (154) configured to detect a temperature of engine water (see column 4, lines 22-29), wherein the ambient temperature is the temperature of the engine water. Vincenzi is silent concerning inclusion of an outside temperature sensor that may sense the ambient temperature. However, Yi discloses an example cylinder (30) of an internal combustion engine (10) including an in-cylinder direct fuel injector (66). Engine (10) can be configured as gasoline engine or a flexible fuel engine for a vehicle. For example, engine (10) can be configured to operate with a fuel including a mixture of gasoline and alcohol (see column 2, lines 15-24). Yi discloses that a control system (12) may assess various operating conditions of the engine via one or more sensors (see Figure 1) among other sensors, for example, ambient air temperature (see Yi, column, 5, lines 15-34). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the control system of Vincenzi by providing outside temperature detection used in the control injection and ignition as described in Yi in order to improve the engine operation during cold-start operation. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vincenzi. Regarding Claim 3, Vincenzi discloses the invention substantially as claimed, including where the controller (130) executes spark ignition of the fuel in a fuel injection period (see column 7, line 12 - column 8, line 55, “cold start mode” activated with coolant temperature is below a threshold temperature, specifically, see column 7 lines 19-25), but is silent concerning the claimed range of the ambient temperature. It nevertheless would have been an obvious matter of design choice to operate spark ignition of the fuel within an ambient temperature range of 5° C to -40° C, since Applicant has not disclosed that doing so solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose and it appears that the invention would perform equally well with at any applicable ambient temperature. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Specifically, various references are cited that provide detail of relevant control systems for engines. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES G MOUBRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5658. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10AM - 6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lindsay M. Low can be reached at 571-272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRANT MOUBRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 04, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706319
HYDROGEN SUPPLY DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698644
Gate Post Adjustment Insert
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697855
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING THE OPERATION OF AN ENGINE-INDEPENDENT AUXILIARY HEATER AND FOR DIAGNOSING A COOLANT TEMPERATURE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691366
PINBALL MACHINES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692830
FUEL VAPOR PROCESSING DEVICE AND COMPONENT UNIT
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 860 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month