Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/069,532

COMPACT LCoS DISPLAY ENGINE FOR ARTIFICIAL REALITY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 04, 2025
Examiner
OKEBATO, SAHLU
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Meta Platforms Technologies, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
509 granted / 668 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
706
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 668 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Elazhary et al., US Patent 11604351 hereinafter referenced as Elazhary in view of Border et al., US PGPUB 20160187654 hereinafter referenced as Border. As to claim 1, Elazhary discloses a display engine comprising: an illumination module (as shown in fig. 1, head mounted device 100 may include one or more light sources disposed outside the field-of-view of the user); an LCoS display panel (e.g., display 402, fig. 4; wherein In some embodiments, display 402 may be a liquid-crystal-on-silicon (LCOS) device); a waveguide (e.g., waveguide 210, fig. 2); and projection optics configured to direct source light from the illumination module to the LCoS display panel and direct image light from the LCoS display panel to the waveguide (as shown in fig. 2B, the illustrated example of optical waveguide 210 is shown as including an input coupler 215 that is configured to couple the display light 205 received from the digital projector 108A into the optical waveguide 210. The display light 205 then propagates within the optical waveguide 210 via total internal reflection (TIR), where the display light 205 then exits the optical waveguide 210 via an output coupler 220 (e.g., a grating) towards the eyeward side 109). Elazhary does not specifically disclose directing image light from the LCoS display panel to the waveguide. However, in the same endeavor, Border discloses directing image light from the LCoS display panel to the waveguide ([0237] wherein the optical assembly includes a corrective element that corrects the user's view of the surrounding environment, a freeform optical waveguide enabling internal reflections, and a coupling lens positioned to direct an image from an optical display, such as an LCoS display, to the optical waveguide). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the disclosure of Elazhary to further include Border’s waveguide arrangements, in order to improve user’s experience with intention of activating desired function effectively. As to claim 11, Elazhary discloses a display engine comprising: a backlight illumination module (as shown in fig. 1, head mounted device 100 may include one or more light sources disposed outside the field-of-view of the user); an LCoS display panel (e.g., display 402, fig. 4; wherein In some embodiments, display 402 may be a liquid-crystal-on-silicon (LCOS) device); a waveguide (e.g., waveguide 210, fig. 2); and projection optics configured to direct source light from the illumination module to the LCoS display panel and direct image light from the LCoS display panel through the collimator to the waveguide (as shown in fig. 2B, the illustrated example of optical waveguide 210 is shown as including an input coupler 215 that is configured to couple the display light 205 received from the digital projector 108A into the optical waveguide 210. The display light 205 then propagates within the optical waveguide 210 via total internal reflection (TIR), where the display light 205 then exits the optical waveguide 210 via an output coupler 220 (e.g., a grating) towards the eyeward side 109). Elazhary does not specifically disclose directing image light from the LCoS display panel to the waveguide and a collimator located between the LCoS display panel and the waveguide. However, in the same endeavor, Border discloses directing image light from the LCoS display panel to the waveguide ([0237] wherein the optical assembly includes a corrective element that corrects the user's view of the surrounding environment, a freeform optical waveguide enabling internal reflections, and a coupling lens positioned to direct an image from an optical display, such as an LCoS display, to the optical waveguide) and a collimator located between the LCoS display panel and the waveguide (Referring to FIG. 4, the image light, which may be polarized and collimated, may optionally traverse a display coupling lens 412, which may or may not be the collimator itself or in addition to the collimator, and enter the waveguide 414). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the disclosure of Elazhary to further include Border’s waveguide arrangements, in order to improve user’s experience with intention of activating desired function effectively. As to claim 19, Elazhary discloses a display engine comprising: an illumination module comprising at least one light emitting diode (as shown in fig. 1, head mounted device 100 may include one or more light sources disposed outside the field-of-view of the user); an LCoS display panel arranged to receive source light output by the illumination module (e.g., display 402, fig. 4; wherein In some embodiments, display 402 may be a liquid-crystal-on-silicon (LCOS) device); a waveguide arranged to receive image light emitted from the LCoS display panel (e.g., waveguide 210, fig. 2); and projection optics configured to direct the source light from the illumination module to the LCoS display panel and direct the image light from the LCoS display panel to the waveguide (as shown in fig. 2B, the illustrated example of optical waveguide 210 is shown as including an input coupler 215 that is configured to couple the display light 205 received from the digital projector 108A into the optical waveguide 210. The display light 205 then propagates within the optical waveguide 210 via total internal reflection (TIR), where the display light 205 then exits the optical waveguide 210 via an output coupler 220 (e.g., a grating) towards the eyeward side 109). Elazhary does not specifically disclose directing image light from the LCoS display panel to the waveguide. However, in the same endeavor, Border discloses directing image light from the LCoS display panel to the waveguide ([0237] wherein the optical assembly includes a corrective element that corrects the user's view of the surrounding environment, a freeform optical waveguide enabling internal reflections, and a coupling lens positioned to direct an image from an optical display, such as an LCoS display, to the optical waveguide). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the disclosure of Elazhary to further include Border’s waveguide arrangements, in order to improve user’s experience with intention of activating desired function effectively. As to claim 2, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 1. The combination further discloses the illumination module comprises a direct-lit module (Elazhary, e.g., digital projectors 108A/108B, fig. 1). As to claim 3, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 1. The combination further discloses the illumination module comprises an edge-lit module (Elazhary, e.g., digital projectors 108A/108B, fig. 1). As to claim 4, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 1. The combination further discloses the illumination module comprises a backlight module (Border, the system may have a backlit system, where the LED RGB triplet may be the light source directed to pass light through the display). As to claim 5, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 1. The combination further discloses the illumination module comprises a polarization recycling element (Elazhary, as shown in fig. 1, in some examples, the optical combiner layer includes a polarization-selective hologram (a.k.a. polarized volume hologram) that diffracts a particular polarization orientation of incident light while passing other polarization orientations). As to claim 6, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 1. The combination further discloses the illumination module and the LCoS display panel are located on opposite sides of the waveguide (Elazhary, e.g., waveguide 210, fig. 2B). As to claim 7, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 1. The combination further discloses the illumination module and the LCoS display panel are located on a common side of the waveguide (Elazhary, e.g., the arrangement of display 402 and lens assembly 404, fig. 4). As to claim 8, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 1. The combination further discloses the waveguide comprises a polarization beam splitter located within the waveguide (Elazhary, The near-eye optical element 110A may also include an optional optical combiner layer that is configured to receive display light that is generated by the digital projector 108A and to direct the display light towards the eyeward side 109 for presentation to the user). As to claim 9, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 1. The combination further discloses the projection optics comprises a polarization beam splitter (Border, e.g., beam splitter 2518, fig. 44). As to claim 10, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 1. The combination further discloses a collimator located between the LCoS display panel and the waveguide (Boarder, referring to FIG. 4, the image light, which may be polarized and collimated, may optionally traverse a display coupling lens 412, which may or may not be the collimator itself or in addition to the collimator, and enter the waveguide 414). As to claim 12, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 11. The combination further discloses the illumination module comprises a direct- lit module (Elazhary, e.g., digital projectors 108A/108B, fig. 1). As to claim 13, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 11. The combination further discloses the illumination module comprises an edge- lit module (Elazhary, e.g., digital projectors 108A/108B, fig. 1). As to claim 14, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 11. The combination further discloses the illumination module comprises a polarization recycling element (Elazhary, as shown in fig. 1, in some examples, the optical combiner layer includes a polarization-selective hologram (a.k.a. polarized volume hologram) that diffracts a particular polarization orientation of incident light while passing other polarization orientations). As to claim 15, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 11. The combination further discloses the illumination module and the LCoS display panel are located on opposite sides of the waveguide (Elazhary, e.g., waveguide 210, fig. 2B). As to claim 16, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 11. The combination further discloses the illumination module and the LCoS display panel are located on a common side of the waveguide (Elazhary, e.g., the arrangement of display 402 and lens assembly 404, fig. 4). As to claim 17, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 11. The combination further discloses the waveguide comprises a polarization beam splitter located within the waveguide (Border, e.g., beam splitter 2518, fig. 44). As to claim 18, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 11. The combination further discloses the projection optics comprises a polarization beam splitter (Border, e.g., beam splitter 2518, fig. 44). As to claim 20, the combination of Elazhary and Border discloses the display engine of claim 19. The combination further discloses a collimator located between the LCoS display panel and the waveguide (Boarder, referring to FIG. 4, the image light, which may be polarized and collimated, may optionally traverse a display coupling lens 412, which may or may not be the collimator itself or in addition to the collimator, and enter the waveguide 414). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Osterhout et al., US PGPUB 20210173480 discloses an interactive head-mounted eyepiece with an integrated processor for handling content for display and an integrated image source for introducing the content to an optical assembly through which the user views a surrounding environment and the displayed content, wherein the eyepiece includes predictive control of external device based on an event input. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAHLU OKEBATO whose telephone number is (571)270-3375. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, WILLIAM BODDIE can be reached at 571-272-0666. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAHLU OKEBATO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2625 10/29/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 04, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594450
MOTOR FUNCTION REHABILITATION SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596511
INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585162
DISPLAYING IMAGES ON TOTAL INTERNAL REFLECTIVE DISPLAYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586547
COMPENSATION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISPLAY APPARATUS, DISPLAY APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582002
LEFT AND RIGHT PROJECTORS FOR DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+18.0%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 668 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month