Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 19/070,057

MAGNETIC FIELD PROPULSION UNIT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 04, 2025
Priority
Mar 08, 2024 — EU 24162378.4
Examiner
NGUYEN, DANNY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tomorrow'S Motion GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1235 granted / 1371 resolved
+30.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1392
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.9%
-0.1% vs TC avg
§102
47.1%
+7.1% vs TC avg
§112
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1371 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 1. Claims 1-2, 4-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Randall et al (USPN 2026/0084807) in view of May (USPN 2022/0181059). Regarding claims 1, 2, 6, Randall discloses a magnetic field propulsion unit (100, see figure 3, par. 0072) configured to generate a drive force (see par. 0074) when being arranged in an external magnetic field (such as an earth magnetic field), comprising: a support structure (a housing 350, see par. 0072 and figure 3); a magnetic field generating device (352) attached to the support structure and configured to generate a first magnetic field; an energy supply unit (a power supply 112, see par. 0053); and a control unit (a controller 310, and details of the controller 310 shown in figure 11 including a controller 1102, see par. 0104), wherein the energy supply unit (112) is configured to provide the magnetic field generating device (352) with electrical energy (from the power supply 112), wherein the control unit (1102) is configured to control the energy supply unit (112) so that the energy supply unit supplies energy to the magnetic field generating device (352) (the energy, that supplied to the magnetic field generating device 352, by controlling a driver 1142) (e.g. see par 0107), wherein the control unit (1102) is configured to supply varying current to the magnetic field generating device (by increasing the current, the duty cycle of the driver 1142, see par. 0107) and wherein the magnetic field generating device (352) has a central axis (see par. 0007) and is arranged in the external magnetic field (the vertical takeoff and landing platform 100, shown in figure 1, is arranged in the earth magnetic field). Randall does not explicitly disclose the central axis of the magnetic field generating device as claimed. May discloses a magnetic field generating device (30, see figure 1) comprises a central axis, wherein the magnetic field generating device is arranged in an external magnetic field (earth magnetic field lines 10) such that the central axis is inclined with respect to magnetic field lines of the external magnetic field at an angle different from 0, 90, 180, and 270 degree (see par. 0017, 0070), wherein the central axis is inclined with respect to magnetic field lines of the external magnetic field (10) at an angle between 30 and 60, 120 and 150 (see par. 0017), 210 and 240, or 300 to 330. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to have modified the central axis of the magnetic field generating device being inclined at angle as disclosed by May in order to prevent a stator of a motor from being wear and tear. Regarding claim 4, Randall discloses wherein the current supplied to the magnetic field generating device (352) is a unipolar current (PWM current pulses) and wherein the current supplied to the magnetic field generating device is a pulsed current (see par. 0107). Regarding claim 5, Randall discloses wherein the magnetic field generating device (352) is a coil (see par. 0072) having multiple windings the coils of the magnetic field generating device 352 includes inherently windings). Regarding claim 7, Randall discloses wherein the magnetic field generating device (352) is firmly attached to the support structure (350). Allowable Subject Matter 2. Claims 3, 8-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 3. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANNY NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2054. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Lewis can be reached at 571-271-1838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANNY NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 04, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739945
VAPORIZER DEVICE HEATER CONTROL
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731983
SUPERCONDUCTOR CURRENT LIMITING DEVICE AND AIRCRAFT COMPRISING SUCH A DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733263
TWO-DIMENSIONAL POWER CLAMP CELL
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12731984
PROTECTION CIRCUIT AND RECEIVING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732180
SOLID STATE RELAY MODULE WITH OVERCURRENT PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1371 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month