Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/070,612

Connector Stud, Connector Dock and Connector System

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 05, 2025
Priority
Mar 05, 2024 — GB 2403177.5
Examiner
UPCHURCH, DAVID M
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Peter Jones (Ilg) Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
767 granted / 1041 resolved
+21.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1072
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§102
49.3%
+9.3% vs TC avg
§112
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1041 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wojciechowskie et al. (U.S. 2004/0042871). As for Claim 1, Wojciechowski discloses a connector stud comprising: a head component (20) including a head portion (22) and a neck portion (28) extending from a first side of the head portion, the head portion having a regular polygonal shape (see Figs. 1-2), wherein the head component includes an annular groove (38) in the first side of the head portion, the annular groove being configured to receive a protrusion of a connector dock (see Fig. 5). Re: Claim 2. The connector stud of claim 1, wherein the annular groove encircles the neck portion (see Fig. 3). Re: Claim 3. The connector stud of claim 1, further comprising a circular boss (26) which protrudes from a second side of the head portion, the second side being opposed to the first side. Re: Claim 4. The connector stud of claim 1, further comprising an exit slot (slot defined by 42 and 44) which forms a discontinuity in a radially outer wall of the annular groove (see Fig. 1), the exit slot configured to allow withdrawal of the protrusion of the connector dock from the annular groove. Re: Claim 5. The connector stud of claim 1, further comprising a base component including a base plate (52) and a spacer (70) which projects away from the base plate (see Fig. 5), wherein at least one of the spacer and the neck portion includes a base attachment interface configured to attach the head component to the base component (see Fig. 5). Re: Claim 6. The connector stud of claim 5, wherein: the base attachment interface is formed by one of the spacer and the neck portion including a recess (58), and the other of the spacer and the neck portion including a complementary protrusion (end portion of 28) which is received by the recess (see Fig. 5), the recess and the protrusion are configured to prevent rotation of the head component relative to the base component (see para [0019-0020]), and the base component includes a threaded insert (see para [0015]) which sits at least partially within a thickness of the spacer and is configured to receive a screw which passes through the neck portion of the head component to fasten the head component to the base component (see para [0015]). Re: Claim 7. A device comprising the connector stud of claim 1 (see Fig. 1, para [0019]). Re: Claim 8. The device of claim 7, wherein the device is an electronic device (see Fig. 1, para [0019]). Re: Claim 9. The device of claim 8, wherein the electronic device is a mobile communications device (see Fig. 1, para [0019]). Claim(s) 10-15 and 20-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ryder. (U.S. 5,103,538). As for Claim 10, Ryder discloses a connector dock comprising: a receiving portion (44) configured to receive a head portion of a connector stud, the head portion having a regular polygonal shape; and a cantilevered tab (106) provided at a front of the receiving portion (see Fig. 4), the tab having a protrusion (protrusion defined by recess 50) which projects from a rear surface of the tab and extends towards a rear of a retaining portion (see Figs. 4 and 5), wherein the protrusion is configured to engage an annular groove formed in a first side of the head portion of the connector stud. Re: Claim 11. The connector dock of claim 10, wherein the receiving portion further includes a front curved surface (upper curved surface defining opening 44) which is configured to support a neck portion of the connector stud extending from the first side of the head portion. Re: Claim 12. The connector dock of claim 11, wherein the front curved surface is formed by a pair of front shoulders (two upper shoulders of surface defining opening 44). Re: Claim 13. The connector dock of claim 10, wherein the receiving portion further includes a rear curved surface (lower curved surface defining opening 44) which is configured to support a circular boss which protrudes from a second side of the head portion, the second side being opposed to the first side. Re: Claim 14. The connector dock of claim 13, wherein the rear curved surface is formed by a pair of rear shoulders (two lower shoulders of surface defining opening 44). Re: Claim 15. The connector dock of claim 14, wherein the cantilevered tab is disposed between the pair of front shoulders (see Fig. 3). Re: Claim 20. The connector dock of claim 10, wherein the protrusion includes an inclined inner surface and an upright outer surface (see Fig. 5 disclosing an inclined and upright surface defining recess 50). As for Claim 21, Ryder discloses connector system comprising: a connector stud (22) including a head component including a head portion (48) and a neck portion (38) extending from a first side of the head portion, the head portion having a regular polygonal shape, wherein the head component includes an annular groove (grooved defined between head and neck 38, see Fig. 5) in the first side of the head portion, the annular groove being configured to receive a protrusion of a connector dock (see Fig. 5); and connector dock (34) including a receiving portion (44) and a cantilevered tab (106), the receiving portion configured to receive a head portion of the connector stud (see Fig. 5), the head portion having a regular polygonal shape (see Fig. 1), the cantilevered tab provided at a front of the receiving portion (see Fig. 4), the tab having a protrusion (protrusion defining recess of 50) which projects from a rear surface of the tab and extends towards a rear of a retaining portion (see Fig. 5), wherein the protrusion is configured to engage an annular groove formed in a first side of the head portion of the connector stud (see Fig. 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Couillais et al. (U.S. 2004/0086355) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID M UPCHURCH whose telephone number is (571)270-7957. The examiner can normally be reached 6AM-3PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at (571)272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID M UPCHURCH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765623
S-SHAPED FASTENER FOR BACK OF BRA
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768474
FIRE PROTECTION COLLAR
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12752988
IN-LINE CABLE BUNDLING SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12741363
LOCKING BUCKLE FOR TOOLBOX WITH DRAWERS
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740620
ROPE ADJUSTING BUCKLE
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+18.0%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1041 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month