Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/070,913

SUPPORTING DEVICE AND PRINTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 05, 2025
Priority
Mar 07, 2024 — JP 2024-034663
Examiner
HEREDIA OCASIO, ARLENE J
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
405 granted / 537 resolved
+7.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
563
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
69.4%
+29.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 537 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Specification ABSTRACT - Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it merely consists of a single run-on sentence without regard for proper grammatical form. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the recitation “that indicates at least a part of a placing position at which the films MA and MB” appears incomplete. Correction is required. See MPEP § 608.01(b). TITLE - The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, because the specification, while being enabling for a supporting device that supports film in a printing device, does not reasonably provide enablement for a supporting device that is, for example: a micropillar for microfluidic channels; a biodegradable scaffolding; a rocket launcher; a ski lift tower; one of an entangled pair of atoms in a quantum computer; a hard disk platter; a magnetic bearing; a belt as an article of clothing; or, a chemical scaffold of a molecule (hereinafter “the unenabled”). The specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make or use the invention commensurate in scope with these claims. The level of ordinary skill of one having ordinary skill in the art of electrophotography, to which the Specification pertains, at the time of effective filing is that of one having a Bachelor’s degree in engineering. However, the level of ordinary skill of one having ordinary skill in the art of the unenabled, to which the enormously broad Claims pertain, at the time of effective filing is as advanced as that of one having an advanced Doctoral degree. Nonetheless, due to the broad claimed applicability, the state of the prior art is largely undeveloped for vast swaths of the Claims’ scope. The predictability thus cannot be said to have any degree of certainty. Applicant has provided no guidance to those having ordinary skill in the art of the unenabled at the time of effective filing for making or using the claimed invention. There are no working examples in the art of the unenabled. Applicant has left the entire onus of experimentation on those who wish to make or use the claimed invention in the art of the unenabled. Applicant did not possess of the full scope of the claimed invention at the time of effective filing. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 5, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by EP 4360895 to Matassini et al. Matassini teaches: (claim 1) A supporting device (12) comprising: a support section (4) configured to support a film (16) on a support surface (14); a static electricity generating section (24, Fig.4) configured to generate static electricity at a static electricity generation location provided at a part (28) of the support surface; and a positioning reference section (20, Fig.6) that is provided at the support surface and that indicates at least a part of a placing position where the film having a predetermined shape is placed (Fig.7), wherein the positioning reference section is disposed in accordance with the predetermined shape such that a part of the film and the static electricity generation location overlap each other in a support direction of the film by the support surface [0026-0029]. (claim 2) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the positioning reference section is visually distinguishably indicated on the support surface. (claim 4) The supporting device according to claim 2, wherein the positioning reference section is indicated by a surface shape different from the surroundings on the support surface (Fig. 6 in view of Fig.3, [0026]). (claim 5) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the positioning reference section is disposed at a position that overlaps with the static electricity generating section in the support direction [0027]. (claim 13) A printing device (4, Fig.1) comprising: a support section (12) configured to support a film (16) on a support surface (14); a printing section (8) configured to perform printing on the film supported by the support surface; a static electricity generating section (24, Fig.4) configured to generate static electricity at a static electricity generation location (28) provided at a part of the support surface; and a positioning reference section (20, Fig.5) that is provided at the support surface and that indicates at least a part of a placing position where the film having a predetermined shape is placed, wherein the positioning reference section is disposed in accordance with the predetermined shape such that a part of the film and the static electricity generation location overlap each other in a support direction of the film by the support surface [0026-0029]. Claim(s) 1-5, 8-11, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DE 1203969 to Beardsley. Beardsley teaches: (claim 1) A supporting device comprising: a support section configured to support a film (14) on a support surface (20); a static electricity generating section (30, Fig.2) configured to generate static electricity at a static electricity generation location provided at a part of the support surface [0013]; and a positioning reference section (see scales in Fig.1) that is provided at the support surface and that indicates at least a part of a placing position where the film having a predetermined shape is placed, wherein the positioning reference section is disposed in accordance with the predetermined shape such that a part of the film and the static electricity generation location overlap each other in a support direction of the film by the support surface . (claim 2) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the positioning reference section is visually distinguishably indicated on the support surface (Fig.1). (claim 3) The supporting device according to claim 2, wherein the positioning reference section is indicated in a color different from the surroundings on the support surface (Fig.1). (claim 4) The supporting device according to claim 2, wherein the positioning reference section is indicated by a surface shape different from the surroundings on the support surface (Fig.1). (claim 5) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the positioning reference section is disposed at a position that overlaps with the static electricity generating section in the support direction (Fig.1). (claim 8) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the film is rectangular and the positioning reference section corresponds to a position that is overlapped by a corner of the film (Fig.1, horizontal and vertical alignment meet this feature). (claim 9) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the film is rectangular and the positioning reference section corresponds to a position along which an edge of the film is to be aligned (Fig.1, horizontal or vertical alignment meet this feature). (claim 10) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the support section is configured to support films of different sizes and the positioning reference section is disposed corresponding to the films of different sizes (Fig.1, [0012]). (claim 11) The supporting device according to claim 10, wherein a plurality of different types of positioning reference sections are disposed so as to be distinguishable from each other in accordance with the films of different sizes (Fig.1). (claim 13) A printing device (10) comprising: a support section (20) configured to support a film on a support surface (20) ; a printing section (11-13) configured to perform printing on the film (14) supported by the support surface; a static electricity generating section (30, Fig.2) configured to generate static electricity at a static electricity generation location provided at a part of the support surface [0013]; and a positioning reference section (see scales in Fig.1) that is provided at the support surface and that indicates at least a part of a placing position where the film having a predetermined shape is placed, wherein the positioning reference section is disposed in accordance with the predetermined shape such that a part of the film and the static electricity generation location overlap each other in a support direction of the film by the support surface. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 5, and 8-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP 2017-159606 to Yamashita. Yamashita teaches: (claim 1) A supporting device (2) comprising: a support section (4) configured to support a film (M) on a support surface (8); a static electricity generating section (13, Fig.5) configured to generate static electricity at a static electricity generation location (regions R1-R16) provided at a part of the support surface; and a positioning reference section (grid) that is provided at the support surface and that indicates at least a part of a placing position where the film having a predetermined shape is placed, wherein the positioning reference section is disposed in accordance with the predetermined shape such that a part of the film and the static electricity generation location overlap each other in a support direction of the film by the support surface (Figs.7-9) . (claim 2) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the positioning reference section is visually distinguishably indicated on the support surface (Fig.7-9). (claim 4) The supporting device according to claim 2, wherein the positioning reference section is indicated by a surface shape different from the surroundings on the support surface (Fig.8-9). (claim 5) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the positioning reference section is disposed at a position that overlaps with the static electricity generating section in the support direction (Fig.7). (claim 8) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the film is rectangular and the positioning reference section corresponds to a position that is overlapped by a corner of the film (e.g. R16, Fig.8). (claim 9) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the film is rectangular and the positioning reference section corresponds to a position along which an edge of the film is to be aligned (e.g., R13-R16, Fig.8). (claim 10) The supporting device according to claim 1, wherein the support section is configured to support films of different sizes and the positioning reference section is disposed corresponding to the films of different sizes [0034, 0041]. (claim 11) The supporting device according to claim 10, wherein a plurality of different types of positioning reference sections are disposed so as to be distinguishable from each other in accordance with the films of different sizes (Figs. 5 & 11). (claim 12) The supporting device according to claim 10, wherein the static electricity generating section is configured to switch the occurrence state of static electricity in accordance with films of different sizes [0034, 0041]. (claim 13) A printing device (1, Fig,1) comprising: a support section (2) configured to support a film on a support surface (8) ; a printing section (7) configured to perform printing on the film (M) supported by the support surface; a static electricity generating section (13, Fig.5) configured to generate static electricity at a static electricity generation location (regions R1-R16) provided at a part of the support surface; and a positioning reference section (grid) that is provided at the support surface and that indicates at least a part of a placing position where the film having a predetermined shape is placed, wherein the positioning reference section is disposed in accordance with the predetermined shape such that a part of the film and the static electricity generation location overlap each other in a support direction of the film by the support surface (Figs. 7-9). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARLENE HEREDIA whose telephone number is (571)272-8393. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephanie Bloss can be reached at (571) 272-3555. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Arlene Heredia Ocasio/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2025
Application Filed
May 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681406
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD, THAT CONTROL CHARGING VOLTAGE ACCORDING TO POSITIONS OF DEVELOPING ROLLER
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669770
CONTROL METHOD OF IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663740
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS WITH CONTROL FOR SETTING TRANSFER BIAS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656704
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS HAVTNG CHARGING VOLTAGE AND DEVELOPING VOLTAGE STEPWISE CONTROL
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12656725
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS WITH EXTERIOR COVER OPENABLE TO FORM A DISCHARGE TRAY
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+3.9%)
1y 8m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 537 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month