Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/070,996

SPECTROSCOPIC MEASUREMENT DEVICE AND ARTICLE INSPECTION DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 05, 2025
Priority
Mar 08, 2024 — JP 2024-036154
Examiner
LUU, THANH X
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Anritsu Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1086 granted / 1387 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1414
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1387 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 10, 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Micheels et al. (U.S. PGPUB 2013/0265568). Regarding claims 1-4, 10, 11, Micheels et al. disclose (Figs.) a spectroscopic measurement device comprising: a light source unit configured to condense light emitted from a light source (300) with a condensing member (310) and irradiate an article (110) with the light; and a light detection unit (140) configured to measure a spectral characteristic of transmission light transmitted through the article with a spectroscope, wherein the condensing member includes a first opening (Fig. 3) on which the light emitted from the light source is incident, a second opening formed to face the light detection unit and having an opening area smaller (Fig. 3) than an opening area of the first opening, and a transfer path (cone) configured to communicate the first opening and the second opening and transfer light entering the first opening to the second opening, and the transfer path has an inner dimension decreasing from the first opening toward the second opening and includes a wall surface ([0058]) consisting of a reflection surface. A cone shaped reflector is a smooth mirror surface. Micheels et al. further disclose (Figs. 3, 8) a relative position with respect to a light-irradiated surface of the article is adjustable (via 335 moving). Micheels et al. further disclose ([0012]) inspecting a quality (“quality control”) as claimed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Micheels et al. in view of Beck et al. (U.S. Patent 4,415,811) Regarding claims 5-7, Micheels et al. disclose the claimed invention as set forth above. Micheels et al. further disclose ([0058]) different condensing members and different types of articles (solids, liquids, etc.). Micheels et al. do not specifically disclose replacing the condensing member according to the type of the article. Beck et al. teach (Fig. 1; col. 4, lines 4-7) changing an optical system based on the type of article being inspected. Thus, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing of the invention to provide replaceable condensing members based on the article type in the apparatus of Micheels et al. in view of Beck et al. to provide optimum detection results as taught, known and predictable. Claim(s) 8, 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Micheels et al. in view of Clark (U.S. Patent 5,255,171) Regarding claims 8, 9, Micheels et al. disclose the claimed invention as set forth above. Micheels et al. do not specifically disclose an opening cover as claimed. Clark teaches (Figs.) an opening cover (diffuser 16, 30) configured to cover a second opening and transmit light passing through the second opening as claimed. Thus, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing of the invention to provide such a cover in the apparatus of Micheels et al. in view of Clark to further diffuse light for more uniformity as taught, known and predictable. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12, 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH LUU whose telephone number is (571)272-2441. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia Epps can be reached at 571-272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THANH LUU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2878
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769143
DIELECTRIC SPLITTER FOR USE IN IMAGING
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768676
OPTICAL MODULE FOR ENCODER, ENCODER, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING OPTICAL MODULE FOR ENCODER
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765085
IMAGE SENSOR DEVICE, EQUIPMENT, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING IMAGE SENSOR DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761071
SENSOR PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND SENSING MODULE THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757304
Illumination Device and Method for Calibrating an Illumination Device Over Changes in Temperature, Drive Current, and Time
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1387 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month