Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/071,520

PERFORMIC ACID ON-SITE GENERATOR AND FORMULATOR

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 05, 2025
Priority
Sep 04, 2015 — provisional 62/214,340 +5 more
Examiner
CHORBAJI, MONZER R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ecolab USA Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
929 granted / 1218 resolved
+16.3% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1255
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1218 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA This is a first action on the merits for this continuous application filed on 03/05/2025 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Dependent method claim 17 depends on system claim 1. However, claim 17 does not recite what structures are or are not included in the claim. The examiner is unable to ascertain the breadth of claim 17 what is or is not included in this claim from independent system claim 1. Applicant is respectfully requested to amend claim 17 to add the intended structures from claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by McSherry et al. (US 7,547,421). Regarding claims 1 and 10, McSherry discloses an adjustable biocide generator system (Fig.15), and a method (col.1, lines 6-13) of on-site performic acid forming composition comprising: An apparatus (Fig.15) comprising at least one inlet, a length of pipe, a heating device, an outlet, and a storage reservoir (Fig.1:21; 38) for dosing a performic acid forming composition from said length of pipe; wherein said inlet(s) are in fluid connection with said length of pipe and supply reagents to produce said performic acid forming composition in said length of pipe; wherein said reagents comprise a formic acid source and an oxidizing agent; wherein said length of pipe is in fluid connection with said outlet to dispense said performic acid forming composition to a cooling system (Fig.1:21; 38) and wherein the concentration of the performic acid at the outlet is at least 1 wt-% (col.8,lines 56-60); Providing a formic acid source (Fig.15) to a length of pipe at a desired flow rate; providing an oxidizing agent to said length of pipe at a desired flow rate; contacting said formic acid source with an effective amount of said oxidizing agent within said length of pipe in the presence of a heating device to form a performic acid composition; delivering (Fig.15) said performic acid composition to a downstream cooling system (Fig.1:21; 38); storage reservoir (Fig.1:21; 38), wherein said performic acid is an individual or mixed performic acid composition according to a user-or system-inputted selection, wherein the reaction to form the performic acid composition begins generating yield instantaneously and reaches maximum yield within 10 minutes or less (col.13 through col.26), and wherein the concentration of the performic acid at the outlet is at least 1 wt-% (col.8, lines 56-60). Regarding claim 2, McSherry et al. discloses that performic acid forming composition is an individual or mixed performic acid forming composition (col.13 through col.47) according to a user-or system-inputted selection, and wherein the mixed performic acid forming composition comprises performic acid and an additional C1-C22 percarboxylic acid (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 3, McSherry et al. discloses that the formic acid source is formic acid, and wherein said oxidizing agent is 1-50% w/v hydrogen peroxide (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 4, McSherry et al. discloses that the reagents do not include a chelating agent, stabilizing agent and/or chemical catalyst (col.13 through col.47); the reagents further comprise a corrosion inhibitor and/or an additional biocide selected from the group consisting of glutaraldehyde, THPS, a quaternary amine, and TTPC (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 5, McSherry et al. further discloses at least one measurement device, wherein said measurement device measure one or more reaction kinetics or system operations for said performic acid forming composition generation (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 6, McSherry et al. discloses that measurement device is selected from the group consisting of conductivity, weight, flow, pH, pressure, temperature, titrator for reagent concentration and combinations thereof (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 7, McSherry et al. discloses that the heating device is selected from the group consisting of a cartridge, heat exchanger, heat blanket, steam jacket, solar panels, steam preheat, an electrical source and combinations thereof (col.13 through col.47); heating device maintains a temperature that does not exceed 200°C for the reagent temperature, and wherein said length of pipe is designed to accommodate at least 5 times the pressure of the system. Regarding claim 8, McSherry et al. discloses a control software (col.13 through col.47) for operating said apparatus to generate a user- or system-inputted performic acid forming composition and desired flow rate of said performic acid forming composition for on-site generation, wherein said control software determines the flow rate and/or timing of feeding of said raw materials to said length of pipe and reaction time required for production of said user-or system-inputted performic acid forming composition and desired flow rate. Regarding claim 9, McSherry et al. discloses a data output means for (col.13 through col.47) sharing information related to said performic acid forming composition formulation, performic acid forming composition consumption or usage, additional performic acid forming composition production-related data or combinations of the same; a safety release valve and/or rupture disk (col.13 through col.47) to vent the system, and wherein the apparatus comprises at least two inlets (col.13 through col.47), wherein the first inlet (col.13 through col.47) doses a formic acid source to said length of pipe and the second inlet (col.13 through col.47) doses an oxidizing agent to said length of pipe, and optionally wherein said second inlet does an oxidizing agent (col.13 through col.47) to said length of pipe via downward flow. Regarding Claim 11, McSherry et al. discloses that the formic acid source is formic acid (col.13 through col.47) and the oxidizing agent is hydrogen peroxide, and wherein the hydrogen peroxide and the performic acid concentration generated on-site is from 2 wt-% to about 15 wt-% and has a higher concentration to the unreacted hydrogen peroxide (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 12, McSherry et al. discloses that the heating device is selected from a group consisting of a cartridge, heat exchanger, heat blanket, steam jacket, solar panels, steam preheat, an electrical source and combinations thereof (col.13 through col.47), and wherein said heating device provides heat sufficient to raise the temperature of the solution within said pipe to a temperature not exceeding about 180°C (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 13, McSherry et al. discloses that the heating device is a cartridge contained with said length of pipe and wherein the difference between said pipe’s inner diameter and said cartridge’s diameter is less than about 5 inches (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 14, McSherry et al. discloses cooling said performic acid to a temperature at or below freezing to stabilize the performic acid composition (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 15, McSherry et al. discloses a step of: (a) measuring variables of the reaction to form the performic acid composition, wherein the measuring step measures conductivity, temperature, product levels, concentrations, IR/UV/VIS spectroscopy, pressure, performic acid and/or oxidant concentrations, and/or flow rate (col.13 through col.47); and/or (b) controlling the method using control software (col.13 through col.47) for operating said apparatus to generate a user- or system-inputted performic acid forming composition and said desired flow rate of said performic acid forming composition for on-site generation. Regarding claim 16, McSherry et al. discloses that the reaction reaches maximum yield within 60 seconds or less (col.13 through col.47), wherein the reaction generates at least about 2% performic acid near instantaneously, the reaction generates at least about 4% performic acid within 1 minute, the reaction generates at least about 8% performic acid within 2 minutes, or the reaction generates at least 15% performic acid within 30 minutes (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 17, McSherry et al. discloses a method of cleaning using an on-site generated performic acid composition comprising: obtaining a user- or system-inputted performic acid composition on-site using the adjustable biocide generator system (col.13 through col.47); applying said performic acid composition in an amount sufficient to sanitize, bleach and/or disinfect a surface in need thereof (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 18, McSherry et al. discloses that the surface is a food item or a plant item and/or at least a portion of a medium, a container, an equipment, a membrane, a system or a facility for growing, holding, processing, packaging, storing, transporting, preparing, cooking or serving the food item or the plant item (col.13 through col.47); the performic acid composition is applied to the surface by means of a spray, immersion, foam, or gel (col.13 through col.47). Regarding claim 19, McSherry et al. discloses applying step lasts for at least 5 seconds (col.13 through col.47); the performic acid composition reduces a microbial population by (col.13 through col.47) at least three log10. Regarding claim 20, McSherry et al. discloses that the surface is liquid system, process water, or surfaces of equipment that come in contact with liquid systems (col.13 through col.47). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONZER R CHORBAJI whose telephone number is (571)272-1271. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-12:00 and 6:00-9:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jill J Warden can be reached at (571)272-1267. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MONZER R CHORBAJI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766480
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INDUCTIVELY HEATING MICRO- AND MESO-CHANNEL PROCESS SYSTEMS
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758936
COMPACT AND MAINTAINABLE WASTE REFORMATION APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758669
VOLATILE COMPOSITION DISPENSER WITH INCREASED MEMBRANE EXPOSURE AND VOLATILE COMPOSITION WEIGHT LOSS
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753338
CORROSION INHIBITION COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE IN SOUR ENVIRONMENTS
3y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12747169
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DISINFECTING FLUIDS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+21.5%)
2y 6m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month