Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/072,304

TECHNIQUES FOR CONCEALED OPTICAL SENSORS AND RELATED APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 06, 2025
Priority
Mar 07, 2024 — provisional 63/562,442
Examiner
HSU, AMY R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Meta Platforms Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
748 granted / 865 resolved
+26.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
878
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 865 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 13, 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2023/0388658 to Feng (“Feng”). Regarding claim 1, Feng teaches a device comprising: a housing; and an optical sensor arranged within the housing and coupled to a first region of the housing (Figure 9A shows an example of the device with an outer housing and the camera on the top portion is seen which is coupled to the adjacent housing section), the optical sensor configured to generate a signal in response to light that passes through the first region of the housing and onto the optical sensor (Feng teaches a photosensitive sensor as well as a flicker sensor which both convert an optical image on a photosensitive surface into an electrical signal, see paragraph [0168]). Regarding claim 2, Feng teaches the device of claim 1, further comprising at least one controller coupled to the optical sensor and configured to determine, based on the signal generated by the optical sensor, a flicker frequency of the light passing through the housing and onto the optical sensor (the electronic device determines a flicker frequency or an artificial light source, see paragraph [0174]). Regarding claim 3, Feng teaches the device of claim 2, wherein the flicker frequency is between 50 Hz and 2000 Hz (the flicker frequency may be for example 50Hz or 100Hz, see paragraph [0072]). Regarding claim 4, Feng teaches the device of claim 2, further comprising a camera, and wherein the at least one controller is configured to adjust an exposure time of the camera based on the flicker frequency (the exposure time may be adjusted based on the flicker frequencies of the artificial light, see paragraph [0076]). Regarding claim 5, Feng teaches the device of claim 2, wherein the at least one controller is configured to generate a frequency space representation of the signal generated by the optical sensor and to determine the flicker frequency based on the frequency space representation (flicker frequency is determined based on a sine wave which is a frequency space representation, see paragraph [0025]). Regarding claim 13, Feng teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the optical sensor is configured to generate the signal in response to light at a plurality of visible light frequencies that passes through the first region of the housing and onto the optical sensor (light passes through the shutter, see paragraph [0099]). Regarding claim 15, Feng teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the optical sensor is a multispectral ambient light sensor (the electronic device obtains light from the ambient brightness information and converts the time sequence into a spectrum, see paragraph [0016]). Regarding claim 16, Feng teaches a system comprising: a camera; a housing comprising a housing shell, the housing shell being configured to permit light to pass through a passthrough region of the housing shell; an optical sensor arranged within the housing and configured to generate a signal in response to light that passes through the passthrough region of the housing and onto the optical sensor; and at least one controller configured to adjust at least one function of the camera based on the signal generated by the optical sensor (Claim 16 is rejected similarly to Claim 1, see citations to the prior art listed with claim 1 above). Regarding claim 17, Feng teaches the system of claim 16, wherein the at least one function includes an exposure time (see claim 4 above). Regarding claim 18, Feng teaches the system of claim 16, wherein the at least one controller is further configured to determine, based on the signal generated by the optical sensor, a flicker frequency of the light passing through the housing and onto the optical sensor (see claim 2 above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6-10, 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Feng as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0246018 to Rho et al. (“Rho”). Regarding claim 6, Feng teaches the device of claim 1, but is silent on showing details of the placement of the internal parts with respect to the housing. Rho teaches a camera within a device wherein the first region is thinner than other regions of the housing adjacent to the first region. See Figure 2B showing the camera and lens in a thinner region of housing above it compared to the portions to the left and right of the sensor. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to modify the teaching of Feng with that of Rho to use a known type of placement for a camera and optical sensor within a device. Regarding claim 7, Feng in view of Rho teach the device of claim 6, wherein an interior side of the housing includes a well, wherein a bottom of the well is the first region of the housing, and wherein the optical sensor is arranged within the well, see further Figure 2B of Rho showing the well within the top portion of the outer housing and surrounding the optical sensor region which is within the well. Regarding claim 8, Feng in view of Rho teach the device of claim 6, wherein the first region of the housing has a thickness between 0.2 mm and 1.0 mm, and the other regions of the housing adjacent to the first region have a thickness greater than 1.0 mm. While particular dimensions are not mentioned by Rho, it would be obvious to use thickness that is normally known in the art and provide a greater thickness to the areas surround the optical sensor. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to modify the teaching of Feng in view of Rho to utilize particular dimensions that are known in the art. Regarding claim 9, Feng in view of Rho teach the device of claim 1, wherein the optical sensor is arranged to contact an interior wall of the first region of the housing. See further Figure 2B of Rho. Regarding claim 10, Feng in view of Rho teach the device of claim 9, wherein the optical sensor is arranged on a flexible printed circuit, and wherein the flexible printed circuit is adhered to the interior wall of the first region of the housing (see Figure 2B, reference number 215 is the FPCB). Claims 19-20 are rejected similarly to claims 6, 9. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Feng as applied to claim 1 above. Regarding claim 14, Feng teaches the device of claim 1, but is silent on wherein the first region of the housing is configured to attenuate at least 75% of light incident on the first region of the housing, such that the light that passes through the first region of the housing and onto the optical sensor is no more than 25% of the light incident on the first region of the housing. One of ordinary skill in the art recognizes that the amount of light that passes through the top surface can be configured according to the particular needs of the device. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to modify the teaching of Feng to attenuate at least 75% of light incident on the first region of the housing to accommodate the type of material that covers the sensor or other factors according the specific device needs. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMY R HSU whose telephone number is (571)270-3012. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached at (571)272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. AMY R. HSU Examiner Art Unit 2664 /AMY R HSU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707161
CAMERA APPARATUS AND OPTICAL DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707296
BACKHAUL OPTIMIZATION DURING EMERGENCY AND DISASTER RECOVERY
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701814
IMAGING ELEMENT AND MOTHER GLASS SUBSTRATE
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12684226
PHOTOGRAPHING DEVICE AND SYSTEM, CARRIER APPARATUS, CONTROL SYSTEM, AND EXPANSION COMPONENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684215
CAMERA MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (-1.2%)
2y 4m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 865 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month