Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/074,127

MEDICAL DEVICE HAVING A SUPPORT STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 07, 2025
Priority
Apr 11, 2019 — continuation of 11/419,676 +1 more
Examiner
DEMIE, TIGIST S
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Boston Scientific Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
343 granted / 457 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
486
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
49.1%
+9.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 457 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 and 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Mirza et al. (US 2008/0086120). Regarding claim 1, Mirza discloses a medical device, the medical device comprising: an elongate member (fig.6E; tubular member 210) having an elongate member proximal end (proximal end of tubular member 210 ) and an elongate member distal end (distal end of tubular member 210 ), the elongate member being electrically conductive and defining a lumen from the elongate member proximal end to the elongate member distal end [0039]; an energy delivery device (fig.6E, electrode 106) configured for puncturing tissue spaced from the elongate member distal end (fig.6E), the energy delivery device including a conductive spacer (see annotated figured); and a layer of insulation(fig.6E; first electrically insulating layer 218) covering the elongate member and extending distal of the elongate member distal end to the energy delivery device [0052]. Regarding claim 2, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 1, further comprising a support spine attached to and extending proximally from the energy delivery device (see annotated figure above). Regarding claim 3, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 1, wherein the support spine is configured to contact the elongate member to provide a pathway for electrical energy to the energy delivery device (fig.6E; see annotated figure below). Regarding claim 4, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 3, wherein a proximal end of the support spine includes a spinal curve to facilitate contact between the support spine and the elongate member (see annotated figure below). PNG media_image1.png 338 542 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 3, wherein a proximal portion of the support spine is bent to facilitate contact between the support spine and the elongate member (see annotated figure below). Regarding claim 7, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 1, wherein the layer of insulation includes a taper distal of the elongate member (fig.6E). Regarding claim 8, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 1, wherein the layer of insulation includes a first material covering the elongate member, and a second material distal of the elongate member [0052]. Regarding claim 9, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 1, wherein the energy delivery device includes a conductive dome distal of the conductive spacer, and the conductive dome is free from the layer of insulation (see annotated figure above). Regarding claim 10, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 1, wherein the elongate member includes a varying wall thickness with a constant outer diameter along its length, or a varying outer diameter with a constant wall thickness along its length [0040]. Claims 11-15 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Abou-Marie (US 2011/0118735). Regarding claim 11, Abou-Marie discloses a medical device, the medical device comprising: an elongate member (fig.1A; elongate member 102) having an elongate member proximal end (proximal end of elongate member 102) and an elongate member distal end (distal end of elongate member 102), the elongate member being electrically conductive [0042] and defining a lumen [0043] from the elongate member proximal end to the elongate member distal end [0039]; an energy delivery device (fig.1A, electrode tip 112) configured for puncturing tissue spaced from the elongate member distal end (fig.1A); a thermal shield (fig.1A; heat shield 118) proximal of the energy delivery device and distal of the elongate member [0050], the thermal shied including a non-conductive material [0050]; and a layer of insulation (fig.1; insulation layer 114) extending distal of the elongate member distal end and partially (junction 112) covering the thermal shield (fig.1A). Regarding claim 12, Abou-Marie discloses the medical device of claim 11, further comprising a support spine attached to and extending proximally from the energy delivery device (see annotated figure below). Regarding claim 13, Abou-Marie discloses the medical device of claim 11, wherein the support spine is configured to contact the elongate member to provide a pathway for electrical energy to the energy delivery device (see annotated figure above). Regarding claim 14, Abou-Marie discloses the medical device of claim 13, wherein a proximal end of the support spine includes a spinal curve to facilitate contact between the support spine and the elongate member (see annotated figure above). Regarding claim 15, Abou-Marie discloses the medical device of claim 13, wherein a proximal portion of the support spine is bent to facilitate contact between the support spine and the elongate member (see annotated figure above). Regarding claim 17, Abou-Marie discloses the medical device of claim 13, wherein the support spine includes a flare to facilitate contact between the support spine and the elongate member (see annotated figure above). Regarding claim 18, Abou-Marie discloses the medical device of claim 11, wherein the non-conductive material is a ceramic or a polymer [0079]. Regarding claim 19, Abou-Marie discloses the medical device of claim 11, wherein the energy delivery device includes a conductive dome distal (fig.1A) and a support structure (support structure 120). Regarding claim 20, Abou-Marie discloses the medical device of claim 11, wherein the elongate member includes a varying wall thickness with a constant outer diameter along its length, or a varying outer diameter with a constant wall thickness along its length [0040]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 11-15 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mirza et al. (US 2008/0086120) in view of Abou-Marie (US 2011/0118735). Regarding claim 11, Mirza discloses a medical device, the medical device comprising: an elongate member (fig.6E; tubular member 210) having an elongate member proximal end (proximal end of tubular member 210 ) and an elongate member distal end (distal end of tubular member 210 ), the elongate member being electrically conductive and defining a lumen from the elongate member proximal end to the elongate member distal end [0039]; an energy delivery device (fig.6E, electrode 106) configured for puncturing tissue spaced from the elongate member distal end (fig.6E); a layer of insulation (fig.6E; insulating layer 220) extending distal of the elongate member distal end (fig.6E). In a different embodiment, Mirza teaches a thermally insulative material, for example Zirconium Oxide or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), may be applied over approximately the distal-most 2 cm of the electrical insulator [0053]. PNG media_image1.png 338 542 media_image1.png Greyscale However, Mirza does not disclose the layer of insulation extending distal of the elongate member distal end and partially covering the thermal shield. Abou-Marie teaches a device comprises an elongate member for receiving the energy from an electrical energy source (abstract). Abou-Marie further teaches the layer of insulation extending distal of the elongate member distal end (fig.1A; insulation layer 114) and partially covering the thermal shield (see annotated figure below). The junction 122 that is formed between the insulation layer 114 and heat sink 118 helps to limit the arcing to the electrode tip [0057].Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the Application was effectively filed to modify as taught by Mirza with the layer of insulation extending distal of the elongate member distal end and partially covering the thermal shield as taught by Abou-Marie for the purpose of preventing arcing. Regarding claim 12, Mirza/ Abou-Marie teaches the medical device of claim 11, further comprising a support spine attached to and extending proximally from the energy delivery device (see annotated figure of Mirza). Regarding claim 13, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 11, wherein the support spine is configured to contact the elongate member to provide a pathway for electrical energy to the energy delivery device (see annotated figure above of Mirza). Regarding claim 14, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 13, wherein a proximal end of the support spine includes a spinal curve to facilitate contact between the support spine and the elongate member (see annotated figure above of Mirza). Regarding claim 15, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 13, wherein a proximal portion of the support spine is bent to facilitate contact between the support spine and the elongate member (see annotated figure above of Mirza). Regarding claim 17, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 13, wherein the support spine includes a flare to facilitate contact between the support spine and the elongate member (see annotated figure above of Mirza). Regarding claim 18, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 11, wherein the non-conductive material is a ceramic or a polymer ([0079] of Mirza). Regarding claim 19, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 11, wherein the energy delivery device includes a conductive dome distal (fig.1A) and a support structure (support structure 120). Regarding claim 20, Mirza discloses the medical device of claim 11, wherein the elongate member includes a varying wall thickness with a constant outer diameter along its length, or a varying outer diameter with a constant wall thickness along its length ([0040] of Mirza). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: None of the references teach wherein the support spine is floppy to facilitate contact between the support spine and the elongate member. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIGIST S DEMIE whose telephone number is (571)270-5345. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5Pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Stoklosa can be reached at 571-2721213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIGIST S DEMIE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746055
MEDICAL DEVICE AND MEDICAL SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746061
CATHETERS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR ENDOVACSULAR TREATMENT OF A BLOOD VESSEL
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740890
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING HEATING BODY, AND HEATING BODY
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744504
CONFIGURABLE MULTI-POLAR RF ABLATION PROBE
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740889
APPARATUS FOR THERMAL THERAPY TREATMENT OF A SELECTED REGION OF THE BODY OF A HUMAN OR OF AN ANIMAL AND METHOD OF OPERATING SAID APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+20.7%)
3y 2m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 457 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month