Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/074,520

SOUND COLLECTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 10, 2025
Priority
Apr 15, 2024 — CN 202410445977.8
Examiner
TRAN, SINH N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
30%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 30% of cases
30%
Career Allowance Rate
8 granted / 27 resolved
-30.4% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
30
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.0%
+1.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 27 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Olson (US 2,228,886). Regarding claim 1, Olson discloses in Fig. 13, a sound collecting device (tubular tubes1-5) comprising: formed in a tubular shape and having a sound collecting opening formed at one end portion; and a microphone (7) disposed at an other end portion of each of the resonant tubes (tubular tubes 1-5), wherein each of the resonant tubes has a reflecting surface (expanded sections 61-65 comprises reflecting surfaces at their end portions) extending toward an inside of the resonant tube at a predetermined distance from the sound collecting opening and the microphone. Regarding claim 2, Olson discloses the sound collecting device according to claim 1, wherein each of the resonant tubes (1-5) includes a sound collecting resonator the sound collecting opening, the reflecting surface, and a section extending from the sound collecting opening to the reflecting surface, and a narrow tube portion (the section of the tubes 1-5 that are between the expanded sections 61-65 and the microphone 7) that is formed with a smaller cross- sectional area than the sound collecting resonator and connects the sound collecting resonator to the microphone. Regarding claim 3, Olson discloses the sound collecting device according to claim 2, wherein the narrow tube portion is formed with a smaller cross- sectional area than an outer shape of the microphone (Fig. 14, the section of the tubes 1-5 that are between the expanded sections 61-65 and the microphone 7 is smaller than the outer shape of the microphone 7). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Olson in view of Kamata et al (WO 2024/202344 A1 filed in IDS) . Olson discloses the sound collecting device according to claim 2, but fails to disclose that the plurality of the narrow tube portions are combined and connected to the microphone. However, Kamata et al disclose in Fig. 9 narrow tube portions 832a-832c are combined and connected to the microphone 820b. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to incorporate Kamata et al.’s teaching to Olson for the purpose of reducing the number of connections to the microphone. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SINH TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7564. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SINH TRAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 10, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12733269
TFT OPTICAL SENSOR APPARATUS AND SYSTEM WITH ENHANCED DYNAMIC RANGE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12720195
PHOTOGRAPHING MODE SWITCHING METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12687670
INFRARED AUTOMATIC SWITCHING LIGHT FILTER WITH WIRELESS POWER SUPPLY
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12647711
WIRELESS EARPIECE WITH EXTERNAL ANTENNA FEATURES AND RELATED TECHNOLOGY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12647673
CREATIVE CAMERA
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
30%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (+36.3%)
2y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 27 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month