Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/074,689

SUPPRESSING A VULNERABILITY OF A CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION PIPELINE WITH AUDIT FUNCTIONALITY

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Mar 10, 2025
Priority
Dec 15, 2022 — continuation of 12/265,629
Examiner
MURPHY, JOSEPH B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Red Hat Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
577 granted / 639 resolved
+30.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
645
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
59.5%
+19.5% vs TC avg
§102
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 639 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to an application filed on March 10, 2025, in which claims 1 through 20 are pending, and ready for examination. Acknowledgement is made of Applicant’s claim for benefit as a Continuation of U.S. Application No. 18/081,803 filed on December 15, 2022, now U.S. Patent No. 12,265,629. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to: http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent No. 12,265,629. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other for the following reason(s): Independent claims 1, 8, and 15 of the instant application are merely broader recitations of the subject matter recited in the independent claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,265,629. That is, the independent claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,265,629 anticipate the independent claims of the instant application. Dependent claims 2-7, 9-14, and 16-20 are each dependent from one of claims 1, 8, 15, and are also rejected based upon that dependency and because these claims recite subject matter similar to the various dependent claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,265,629. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Shah, et al., U.S. Pub. No. 2020/0202006 Ocepek, et al., U.S. Patent No. 11,057,418 Thakur, Satyendra, U.S. Pub. No. 2014/0331326 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to J. Brant Murphy whose telephone number is (571)272-6433. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8am - 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Mehrmanesh can be reached at 571-270-3351. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J. BRANT MURPHY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2435 June 13, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 10, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683956
PASSWORD RESET USING AN ASYMMETRIC ENCRYPTION KEY PAIR
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683780
DISTRIBUTED DIGITAL WALLET SEED PHRASE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676757
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF DIGITAL ASSET WRAPPING USING A PUBLIC KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY (PKC) FRAMEWORK
1y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675418
ETHERNET-ATTACHED SSD FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671586
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING DIFFERENTIAL SECURITY SERVICES FOR SHIP NETWORKS USING USER AUTHENTICATION-BASED PACKET CLASSIFICATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.7%)
2y 0m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 639 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month