Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/076,378

METHOD OF GENERATING FULLBODY ANIMATABLE PERSON AVATAR FROM SINGLE IMAGE OF PERSON, COMPUTING DEVICE AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM IMPLEMENTING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Mar 11, 2025
Priority
Nov 02, 2022 — RU 2022128498 +2 more
Examiner
THOMPSON, JAMES A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
619 granted / 727 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
737
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§103
57.0%
+17.0% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 727 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority 2. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The Information Disclosure Statements filed 11 March 2025 and 16 April 2025 have been fully considered by Examiner. Annotated copies are included herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 4. 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. 5. Claims 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claims do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because the claims are directed to a “computer-readable medium using computer-executable instructions” which includes not only statutory embodiments, such as a non-transitory computer-readable medium or a computer-readable device, but also non-statutory embodiments, such as a computer-readable electromagnetic signal medium encoded with the computer-readable instructions. See MPEP § 2106.03(I). Therefore, claims 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 1-14 are allowed. Claims 15-20, while not allowable, distinguish over the prior art. Claim 1 recites a “computer-implemented method of generating fullbody animatable avatar of a person from a single image of the person, the method comprising: “obtaining an image of a person body and a parametric body model defined by pose parameters and shape parameters of the person body in the image, and by camera parameters used when capturing the image; “defining, based on the parametric body model, a texturing function including a mapping between each pixel corresponding to a part of the person body shown in the image and corresponding texture coordinates in a texture space, and corresponding texture coordinates in the texture space for a part of the person body not shown in the image; “sampling RGB texture of the person body based on the mapping and obtaining a map of sampled pixels, wherein the RGB texture includes: “for each pixel corresponding to a part of the person body shown in the image, a corresponding pixel value, and “one or more unshown texture regions corresponding to the texture coordinates for the part of the person body not shown in the image; “passing the image of the person body through a trained encoder-generator network to generate texture of the person body shown in the image; “concatenating the RGB texture, the map of sampled pixels, and the generated texture to obtain neural texture; “inpainting unshown texture regions of the neural texture by a trained diffusion-based inpainting model; and “translating a rasterized image of a fullbody avatar of the person body in a different pose by a trained neural renderer into a rendered image of the fullbody avatar of the person body in the different pose, “wherein the rasterized image is obtained based on the inpainted neural texture and the mapping included in the texturing function, in which wherein the parametric body model is modified based on target pose parameters or target camera parameters, and “wherein the target pose parameters or the target camera parameters correspond to the different pose of the fullbody avatar of the person body.” While there is related prior art, Examiner has not discovered any prior art which fully teaches claim 1, either singly or in an obvious combination. Related prior art includes: A. A. Raj, J. Tanke, J. Hays, M. Vo, C. Stoll and C. Lassner, “ANR: Articulated Neural Rendering for Virtual Avatars,” 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Nashville, TN, USA, 2021, pp. 3721-3730, doi: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00372, which teaches Articulated Neural Rendering (ANR), a Deferred Neural Rendering (DNR) for creating, animating, and rendering virtual human avatars, accounting for geometric misalignment and pose-dependent deformation to provide better temporal stability, level of detail and plausibility. B. A. Shysheya et al., “Textured Neural Avatars,” 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019, pp. 2382-2392, doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00249, which teaches a system for learning full body neural avatars, using deep networks that produce full body renderings of a person for varying body and camera poses, and generating images of humans using image-to-image translation. C. A. Grigorev et al., “StylePeople: A Generative Model of Fullbody Human Avatars,” 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Nashville, TN, USA, 2021, pp. 5147-5156, doi: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00511, which teaches modeling full-body human avatars with clothing and hair, combining a parametric mesh-based body model with a neural texture. D. Kanazawa et al., US-2025/0086760-A1, which teaches machine-learning models and contextual attention data to provide more realistic and efficient data augmentation, including inpainting which uses a machine-learning model to generate predicted contextual attention data and blend the predicted contextual attention data with obtained contextual attention data to determine replacement data for augmenting an image to replace one or more occlusions. E. Zheng et al., US-2025/0054116-A1, which teaches generating in-painted digital images by generating replacement pixels for replacement regions. F. Sarafianos et al., US-2024/0078745-A1, which teaches mapping a body surface at multiple virtual viewpoints, including texture and in-painting, using a machine-learning model. G. Petrangeli et al., US-2023/0162330-A1, which teaches mapping an input image to modify a target region using a neural network. H. Garg et al., US-2023/0046431-A1, which teaches generating 3D virtual objects from 2D garment images using 3D training models. I. Vo et al., US-2022/0036626-A1, which teaches generate 3D avatars of a person with neural networks using multiple poses, and generating rendered neural textures based on mapping between the 3D geometry visible from the viewing direction and the neural texture. J. Shysheya et al., US-2021/0358197-A1, which teaches textured neural avatars. None of the prior art cited above, nor any other prior art discovered by Examiner, fully teaches claim 1, either singly or in an obvious combination. Therefore, claim 1 distinguishes over the prior art. Claims 14 and 15 each distinguish over the prior art for the reasons set forth above with respect to claim 1. Claims 2-13 and 16-20 each distinguish over the prior art at least due to their respective dependencies. Claims 1-14 each distinguish over the prior art, and there are no outstanding grounds of rejection or objection for claims 1-14. Accordingly, claims 1-14 are allowed. Claims 15-20 each distinguish over the prior art, but there are rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 101 outstanding, as set forth above. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to James A Thompson whose telephone number is (571)272-7441. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Harrington can be reached at 571-272-2330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES A THOMPSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 11, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12694585
AUGMENTING HUMAN VISION IN LIMITED-VISIBILITY ENVIRONMENTS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690113
LIGHTING EFFECT EDITING DEVICE AND METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12682576
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12653642
METHOD FOR GENERATING A DENTAL IMAGE
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12657751
METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH IMAGE PROCESSING
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+3.4%)
2y 10m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 727 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month