Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/077,171

INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND SYSTEMS, CATHETERS, AND METHODS WITH A MANUAL PULLBACK ARRANGEMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 12, 2025
Examiner
TALTY, MARIA CHRISTINA
Art Unit
3797
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
75 granted / 121 resolved
-8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
165
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 121 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The use of the term Boston Scientific CorporationTM (Page 11 Line 3) and Measurement SpecialtiesTM (Page 17 Line 15), which are trade names or marks used in commerce, have been noted in this application. The terms should be accompanied by the generic terminology; furthermore the terms should be capitalized wherever they appear or, where appropriate, include a proper symbol indicating use in commerce such as ™, SM , or ® following the terms. Although the use of trade names and marks used in commerce (i.e., trademarks, service marks, certification marks, and collective marks) are permissible in patent applications, the proprietary nature of the marks should be respected and every effort made to prevent their use in any manner which might adversely affect their validity as commercial marks. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7, 9-16, 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Belef et al. (US 6398755) in view of Stigall et al. (US 20140276016). Regarding Claim 1, Belef teaches a system, (Abstract “system (2)”), for imaging a blood vessel, (Column 2 Lines 6-10 “Imagining using computer-assisted reconstruction algorithms enables physicians to view a representation of the patient's interior intravascular structures in two or three dimensions (i.e., so-called three-dimensional or longitudinal view reconstruction).”), the system comprising: a) a catheter shaft, (Column 4 Line 55 “catheter 24”), having a proximal end region (Column 5 Line 18 “proximal end 50”); b) a telescope assembly disposed at the proximal end region, (Fig. 1), the telescope assembly including a first telescope tube, (Column 4 Line 16 “telescoping portion 51”), and a second telescope tube, (Column 4 Line 59 “catheter sheath 36” and Fig. 1), the telescope assembly including a seal (Column 6 Line 60 “There is a sliding seal between end 50 and portion 51”); and c) an imaging assembly slidably disposed within the catheter shaft, the imaging assembly including a drive shaft and an imaging device coupled to the drive shaft (Fig. 1 and Column 4 Lines 57-66 “Catheter 24 includes a catheter core 34, with an operative element 32 (typically an ultrasonic transducer) at its distal end, housed within a catheter sheath 36. Catheter drive unit 22 includes a housing 28 to which an LCD translation displacement display 30 is mounted. Display 30 provides the user with translation displacement information relating to the translational (that is, longitudinal or axial) position of operative element 32. Catheter core 34 is rotatable and translatable (longitudinally slidable) within sheath 36 of catheter 24.”). However, Belef does not explicitly teach a proximal member coupled to the telescope assembly, the proximal member including a flush port. In an analogous flushing for imaging catheters field of endeavor, Stigall teaches a system for imaging a blood vessel, ([0024] “The imaging assembly 120 produces ultrasound energy and receives echoes from which real time ultrasound images of a thin section of the blood vessel are produced.”), the system comprising: a proximal member coupled to the telescope assembly, the proximal member including a flush port (Fig. 1, where connector 170 has flush port 190 connected to it). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s filing to modify Belef with proximal member including a flush port of Stigall because it allows fluid communication between the ends of the catheter system, for example, to allow the lumen of the catheter to fill with blood, as taught by Stigall in [0026]. Regarding Claim 2, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 1, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches wherein the imaging device includes an ultrasound transducer (Column 4 Lines 57-59 “Catheter 24 includes a catheter core 34, with an operative element 32 (typically an ultrasonic transducer) at its distal end, housed within a catheter sheath 36.). Regarding Claim 3, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 1, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches wherein the seal is disposed between the first telescope tube and the second telescope tube (Fig. 1 and Column 6 Line 60 “There is a sliding seal between end 50 and portion 51”). Regarding Claim 4, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 1, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches a handle coupled to the telescope assembly (Fig. 2, where housing 28 provides a handle coupled to the telescope assembly). Regarding Claim 5, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 1, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches a pullback slider coupled to the drive shaft (Column 7 Line 33 “The invention is typically used in a pullback mode” and Figs. 2 and 3, where drive unit interface 82 is mounted to be slidable and is coupled to drive unit 22.). Regarding Claim 6, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 1, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches wherein a portion of the telescope assembly is coupled to the drive shaft (Fig. 1 via hub 49). Regarding Claim 7, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 1, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches wherein the first telescope tube is coupled to the drive shaft (Fig. 1, where telescoping portion 51 is coupled to catheter drive unit 22 via hub 49). Regarding Claim 9, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 1, as discussed above. Furthermore, Stigall teaches wherein the catheter shaft includes an open distal end (Figs. 2A-2D and Claim 1 “a plurality of openings at a distal end of the catheter.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s filing to modify Belef with the open distal end of Stigall because the modification allows for easy passage of fluids once the distal end is inserted properly into the patient. Regarding Claim 10, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 1, as discussed above. Furthermore, Stigall teaches wherein the catheter shaft defines a lumen and wherein the flush port is in fluid communication with the lumen ([0025] “The flush port 190 is connected to a lumen (not shown) that runs the length of the catheter 100, allowing fluid communication between the ex-corporal portion and the pull-back chamber 130.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s filing to modify Belef with the lumen of Stigall for the same reasons as Claim 1 above. Regarding Claim 11, Belef teaches a system for imaging a blood vessel, the system comprising: a) a catheter shaft having a lumen, (Fig. 1, where the sheath 36 is shown to have a lumen to house catheter core 34), formed therein and having a proximal end region (Column 5 Line 18 “proximal end 50”); b) a telescope assembly disposed at the proximal end region, (Fig. 1), the telescope assembly including a first telescope tube, (Column 4 Line 16 “telescoping portion 51”), and a second telescope tube, (Column 4 Line 59 “catheter sheath 36” and Fig. 1), the telescope assembly including a seal (Column 6 Line 60 “There is a sliding seal between end 50 and portion 51”); c) an imaging assembly slidably disposed within the catheter shaft, the imaging assembly including a drive shaft and an imaging device coupled to the drive shaft (Fig. 1 and Column 4 Lines 57-66 “Catheter 24 includes a catheter core 34, with an operative element 32 (typically an ultrasonic transducer) at its distal end, housed within a catheter sheath 36. Catheter drive unit 22 includes a housing 28 to which an LCD translation displacement display 30 is mounted. Display 30 provides the user with translation displacement information relating to the translational (that is, longitudinal or axial) position of operative element 32. Catheter core 34 is rotatable and translatable (longitudinally slidable) within sheath 36 of catheter 24.”). However, Belef does not explicitly teach a housing coupled to the telescope assembly, the housing including a flush port. In an analogous flushing for imaging catheters field of endeavor, Stigall teaches a system for imaging a blood vessel, ([0024] “The imaging assembly 120 produces ultrasound energy and receives echoes from which real time ultrasound images of a thin section of the blood vessel are produced.”), the system comprising: a housing coupled to the telescope assembly, ([0023] “The end of the telescope section is defined by the connector 170 which allows the catheter 100 to be interfaced to an interface module”), the housing including a flush port (Fig. 1, where connector 170 has flush port 190 connected to it). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s filing to modify Belef with proximal member including a flush port of Stigall because it allows fluid communication between the ends of the catheter system, for example, to allow the lumen of the catheter to fill with blood, as taught by Stigall in [0026]. Regarding Claim 12, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 11, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches wherein the seal is disposed between the first telescope tube and the second telescope tube (Fig. 1 and Column 6 Line 60 “There is a sliding seal between end 50 and portion 51”). Regarding Claim 13, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 11, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches a handle coupled to the telescope assembly (Fig. 2, where housing 28 provides a handle coupled to the telescope assembly). Regarding Claim 14, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 11, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches a pullback slider coupled to the drive shaft (Column 7 Line 33 “The invention is typically used in a pullback mode” and Figs. 2 and 3, where drive unit interface 82 is mounted to be slidable and is coupled to drive unit 22.). Regarding Claim 15, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 11, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches wherein a portion of the telescope assembly is coupled to the drive shaft (Fig. 1, where telescoping portion 51 is coupled to catheter drive unit 22 via hub 49). Regarding Claim 16, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 11, as discussed above. Furthermore, Belef teaches wherein the first telescope tube is coupled to the drive shaft (Fig. 1, where telescoping portion 51 is coupled to catheter drive unit 22 via hub 49). Regarding Claim 18, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 11, as discussed above. Furthermore, Stigall teaches wherein the catheter shaft includes an open distal end (Figs. 2A-2D and Claim 1 “a plurality of openings at a distal end of the catheter.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s filing to modify Belef with the open distal end of Stigall because the modification allows for easy passage of fluids once the distal end is inserted properly into the patient. Regarding Claim 19, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claim 11, as discussed above. Furthermore, Stigall teaches wherein the flush port is in fluid communication with the lumen ([0025] “The flush port 190 is connected to a lumen (not shown) that runs the length of the catheter 100, allowing fluid communication between the ex-corporal portion and the pull-back chamber 130.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s filing to modify Belef with the lumen of Stigall for the same reasons as Claim 1 above. Regarding Claim 20, Belef teaches a medical device for imaging a blood vessel, (Fig. 1), the medical device comprising: a) a catheter shaft having a lumen, (Fig. 1, where the sheath 36 is shown to have a lumen to house catheter core 34), formed therein and having a proximal end region (Column 5 Line 18 “proximal end 50”); b) a telescope assembly coupled to the proximal end region, (Fig. 1), the telescope assembly including a seal, (Column 6 Line 60 “There is a sliding seal between end 50 and portion 51”), a first telescope tube, (Column 4 Line 16 “telescoping portion 51”), and a second telescope tube (Column 4 Line 59 “catheter sheath 36” and Fig. 1); and c) an imaging assembly slidably disposed within the catheter shaft, the imaging assembly including a drive shaft and an imaging device coupled to the drive shaft (Fig. 1 and Column 4 Lines 57-66 “Catheter 24 includes a catheter core 34, with an operative element 32 (typically an ultrasonic transducer) at its distal end, housed within a catheter sheath 36. Catheter drive unit 22 includes a housing 28 to which an LCD translation displacement display 30 is mounted. Display 30 provides the user with translation displacement information relating to the translational (that is, longitudinal or axial) position of operative element 32. Catheter core 34 is rotatable and translatable (longitudinally slidable) within sheath 36 of catheter 24.”). However, Belef does not explicitly teach the telescope assembly including a housing, and a flush port coupled to the housing. In an analogous flushing for imaging catheters field of endeavor, Stigall teaches a medical device for imaging a blood vessel, ([0024] “The imaging assembly 120 produces ultrasound energy and receives echoes from which real time ultrasound images of a thin section of the blood vessel are produced.”), the medical device comprising: a telescope assembly including a housing and a flush port coupled to the housing ([0023] “The end of the telescope section is defined by the connector 170 which allows the catheter 100 to be interfaced to an interface module”), the housing including a flush port (Fig. 1, where connector 170 has flush port 190 connected to it). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s filing to modify Belef with proximal member including a flush port of Stigall because it allows fluid communication between the ends of the catheter system, for example, to allow the lumen of the catheter to fill with blood, as taught by Stigall in [0026]. Claims 8 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Belef et al. (US 6398755) in view of Stigall et al. (US 20140276016), as applied to Claims 1 and 11, further in view of Havel et al. (US 20150094595). Regarding Claims 8 and 17, the modified system of Belef teaches all limitations of Claims 1 and 11, as discussed above. However, the modified system of Belef teaches wherein the drive shaft includes a coil. In an analogous over-the-wire ultrasound field of endeavor, Havel teaches a system for imaging a blood vessel, (Abstract “Disclosed are embodiments of devices and methods for imaging the inside of a body part, such as a blood vessel.”), wherein the drive shaft includes a coil ([0065] “Coil 80 is a conductor which is wrapped or coiled multiple times about the rotation axis. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, coil 80 is positioned in the axial direction (relative to the rotation axis) between motor 32 and transducer 28 and adjacent to wall 24 of catheter 22.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s filing to further modify with the coil of Havel because the coil can be energized in order to pivot the imaging assembly within the catheter, thereby allowing for effective cross sectional imaging, as taught by Havel in [0009] and [0066]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARIA CHRISTINA TALTY whose telephone number is (571)272-8022. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8:30-5:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mike Carey can be reached at (571) 270-7235. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARIA CHRISTINA TALTY/ Examiner, Art Unit 3797 /MICHAEL J CAREY/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3795
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588889
ULTRASONIC ENDOSCOPE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582374
PERSONALIZED MOTION-GATED CORONARY CTA SCANNING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569300
SYSTEMS AND METHODS RELATED TO ELONGATE DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569125
MEDICAL IMAGING SYSTEM, MEDICAL IMAGING PROCESSING METHOD, AND MEDICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12551185
On-Screen Markers For Out-Of-Plane Needle Guidance
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+32.9%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 121 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month