Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/077,457

INTELLIGENT POWER DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Mar 12, 2025
Priority
Jul 29, 2022 — CIP of 12/537,370 +5 more
Examiner
PHAM, DUC M
Art Unit
2849
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Towa Industries Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
557 granted / 630 resolved
+20.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
672
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
77.6%
+37.6% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 630 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This office action is a response to an application filed on 03/12/2025 in which claims 21-44 are pending and ready for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The phrase “said power distribution circuit” in lines 6-7 is unclear because the claim has a primary power distribution circuit and a secondary power distribution circuit. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ross et al (hereinafter Ross) (US 9,081,568 B1). As to claim 21, Ross discloses a power distribution management system (see abstract) comprising: first, second and third power outlets (Fig 3, 220); said first, second and third power outlets each including a selector switch (Fig 3, 236, 244, 234) to designate said first, second and third power outlets on either a primary (Fig 3, 206) or a secondary power distribution circuit (Fig 3, 208); at least one of said first, second and third power outlets is switched to said primary power distribution circuit, and at least one of said first, second and third power outlets is switched to said secondary power distribution circuit (col 3, lines 5-9); said power distribution circuit includes a circuit power monitor (col 4, lines 15-17, power monitoring) that is configured to monitor power used by said circuit and power used on each of said first, second and third power outlets (col 12, lines 30-32); and a controller (Fig 8, 252); said controller is configured to selectively disable power to one or more power outlets on said secondary power distribution circuit when power monitored by said circuit power monitor achieves a threshold value (col 10, lines 49-52, 62-64, col 11, lines 22-25, overcurrent/mismatch condition); said controller is configured to enable power to one or more power outlets on said secondary power distribution circuit that have been disabled when power monitored by said circuit power monitor falls below said threshold value (Fig 7, the 220 is enable when there is no overcurrent/mismatch occurred). Ross does not disclose about a threshold value. However, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the system of Ross to have the power monitor is above the threshold value in order to protect the outlets when too much current applied to them. As to claim 22, Ross discloses the power distribution system as defined in claim 21, wherein one or more of said circuit power monitor and said outlet power monitor is comprised of a current transformer (col 4, line 16). Claim(s) 23-44 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ross et al (hereinafter Ross) (US 9,081,568 B1) in view of Cooper (US 11,183,843 B1). As to claim 23, Ross discloses the power distribution system as defined in claim 21, wherein one or more devices powered by said power outlets comprise critical devices (Fig 7, 202) on said primary power distribution circuit. Ross does not disclose wherein one or more devices powered by said power outlets on said secondary power distribution circuit comprise battery chargers. However, Cooper discloses one or more devices powered by said power outlets on said secondary power distribution circuit comprise battery chargers (Fig 12, 66). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the system of Ross to include the charger as taught by Cooper in order to provide power to the battery. As to claim 24, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the power distribution system as defined in claim 22, wherein one or more devices powered by said power outlets comprise critical devices (Ross, Fig 7, 202) on said primary power distribution circuit, and wherein one or more devices powered by said power outlets on said secondary power distribution circuit comprise battery chargers (Cooper, Fig 12, 66). As to claims 25 and 37, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the power distribution system as defined in claim 21, wherein said controller is further configured to selectively enable power to said one more power outlets in said secondary power distribution circuit that have been disabled based on associated amount of power used prior to disabling (Cooper, see Fig 4, col 30, lines 4-35, the priority load 16-18 is connected when the power of generator is available and vice versa). As to claims 26 and 38, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the power distribution system as defined in claim 24, wherein said controller is further configured to selectively enable power to said one more power outlets in said secondary power distribution circuit that have been disabled based on associated amount of power used prior to disabling (see Fig 4, col 30, lines 4-35, the priority load 16-18 is connected when the power of generator is available and vice versa). As to claims 27 and 39, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the power distribution system as defined in claim 25, wherein said controller enables power to said one more power outlets in said secondary power distribution circuit that have been disabled based on power usage of said disable power outlet prior to disconnection (see Fig 4, col 30, lines 4-35). As to claims 28 and 40, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the power distribution system as defined in claim 26, wherein said controller enables power to said one more power outlets in said secondary power distribution circuit that have been disabled based on power usage of said disable power outlet prior to disconnection (see Fig 4, col 30, lines 4-35). As to claims 29 and 41, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the power distribution system as defined in claim 21, wherein said controller is further configured to tracks a total power usage of said primary and/or secondary power distribution circuits (Cooper, see col 59, lines 16-25); and further including outlet power monitors (Cooper, Fig 27, 23, alt 23) that are configured to provide power data for individual outlets on said primary and/or secondary power distribution circuits (Cooper, see col 15, line 56 to col 16, line 2). As to claims 30 and 42, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the power distribution system as defined in claim 28, wherein said controller is further configured to tracks a total power usage of said primary and/or secondary power distribution circuits (see col 59, lines 16-25); and further including outlet power monitors (Fig 27, 23, alt 23) that are configured to provide power data for individual outlets on said primary and/or secondary power distribution circuits (see col 15, line 56 to col 16, line 2). As to claims 31 and 43, Ross discloses a method for managing power distribution (see abstract) comprising: providing first, second and third power outlets (Fig 3, 220); said first, second and third power outlets each including a selector switch (Fig 3, 236, 244, 234) to designate said first, second and third power outlets on either a primary (Fig 3, 206) or a secondary power distribution circuit (Fig 3, 208); at least one of said first, second and third power outlets is switched to said primary power distribution circuit, and at least one of said first, second and third power outlets is switched to said secondary power distribution circuit (col 3, lines 5-9); said power distribution circuit includes a circuit power monitor (col 4, lines 15-17, power monitoring) that is configured to monitor power used by said circuit and power used on each of said first, second and third power outlets (col 12, lines 30-32); providing a controller (Fig 8, 252); said controller is configured to selectively disable power to one or more power outlets on said secondary power distribution circuit; said controller is configured to enable power to one or more power outlets on said secondary power distribution circuit that have been disabled (col 10, lines 49-52, 62-64, col 11, lines 22-25, overcurrent/mismatch condition); monitoring total current draw on said primary and/or secondary power distribution circuits by said controller (see col 59, lines 16-25); prioritizing power delivery to devices on said primary power distribution circuit (Fig 3, the primary source 206 will provide power to the load 202); selectively disconnecting devices on said secondary power distribution circuit when said total current exceeds a predefined threshold value (col 10, lines 49-52, 62-64, col 11, lines 22-25, overcurrent/mismatch condition); and selectively reconnecting devices on said secondary power distribution circuit when said total current falls below said predefined threshold value (Fig 7, the 220 is enable when there is no overcurrent/mismatch occurred). Ross does not disclose: supplying power from an inverter to said primary and/or secondary power distribution circuits; measuring current to each device connected to said primary and/or secondary power distribution circuits using a plurality of current transformers. However, Cooper discloses supplying power from an inverter (Fig 27, 133) to said primary and/or secondary power distribution circuits; measuring current to each device connected to said primary and/or secondary power distribution circuits using a plurality of current transformers (see Fig 15, 23d, current transformer, col 53, lines 57-60). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the system of Ross to include the teachings as taught by Cooper in order to effectively monitor the current of the outlets through current transformers. As to claim 32, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the method as defined in claim 31, wherein measuring current comprises using an analog-to-digital converter to convert analog signals from said current transformers into digital data (see col 61, lines 29-33). As to claim 33, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the method as defined in claim 31, further comprising transmitting and receiving data over a powerline communications module (Fig 4, 26a-26c, 27a-27b, 28a-28c) to coordinate power distribution. As to claim 34, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the method as defined in claim 32, further comprising transmitting and receiving data over a powerline communications module (Fig 4, 26a-26c, 27a-27b, 28a-28c) to coordinate power distribution. As to claim 35, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the method as defined in claim 31, further comprising analyzing power usage data stored by said microcontroller to optimize load management (see col 39, lines 18-21, col 60, lines 10-19). As to claim 36, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the method as defined in claim 34, further comprising analyzing power usage data stored by said microcontroller to optimize load management (see col 39, lines 18-21, col 60, lines 10-19). As to claim 44, the combination of Ross and Cooper discloses the computer program product as defined in claim 43, wherein said instructions a) include transmitting and receiving power management data over a powerline communications module (Fig 4, 26a-26c, 27a-27b, 28a-28c), b) further cause said processor to store historical power usage data for later analysis (see col 39, lines 18-21, col 60, lines 10-19), and/or c) include generating real-time alerts when said total current draw approaches said predefined threshold (see col 38, lines 48-51; col 78, lines 10-21). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2023/0291206 A1; US 2019/0181690 A1. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DUC M PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-5026. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00 am - 6:00 pm, Monday to Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kim, Taelor can be reached at 571-270-7166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DUC M PHAM/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 May 26, 2026 /DANIEL C PUENTES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12658846
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ISOLATING A HIGH VOLTAGE CONTINUOUSLY PRODUCING POWER SOURCE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658731
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTELLIGENT STATIC TRANSFER SWITCHING
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12627163
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROTECTING BATTERY PACK
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627167
POWER FEED CONTROL DEVICE
1y 12m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12606027
HIGH VOLTAGE TO LOW VOLTAGE POWER CONVERSION SYSTEM FOR HIGH VOLTAGE POST IMPACT ELECTRICAL INTEGRITY AND DISCHARGE SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.7%)
2y 4m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 630 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month